DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20221237

The coalition of three f: family, friend and firms; a study on migrant entrepreneurs in Mumbai

Bedanga Talukdar, Archana K. Roy

Abstract


Background: The paper examines how family and friends help successfully manage a firm and support in entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurial activity necessitates long-enduring working hours and often involves financial and emotional hardships. The study explores the collective effect of migrants’ social capital, i.e., family and friend which facilitating labour and finance at new location. 

Methods: For the present study, the primary survey was conducted in Mumbai from February 2018 to August 2018. A total sample of 540 self-employed migrants operating the business in Mumbai were interviewed.

Results: There are distinctive migration network channels in the form of family relatives, kin, friends, co-villager, local acquaintance. Age and marital status have surfaced to be paramount predictors for choosing self-employment. Confounders like bonds among family members, kins, friends and community support play an important in operating the enterprise. Results from logistic regression suggest that married entrepreneurs are 0.64 times more likely to have higher income than the never married individuals. Firms where spouses were actively engaged, were more likely to have higher income than reference category. The number of family members living together and helping firm activity is statistically significant with better business performance.

Concussions: Salient findings suggest there is a greater degree of reliance among household members in migrant families. Migrant family members depict interpersonal bonds and common self-interest to provide financial and labour resource that helps in establishing and operating a business. Migrant network plays a key role in facilitating informal lending institutions providing credit and finance.


Keywords


Migration, Social capital, Entrepreneurship, Development

Full Text:

PDF

References


United Nations. Doha Declaration on Financing for Development (New York, United Nations publication, 0920901). 2009. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/doha/documents/DohaDeclarationFFD.pdf. Accessed on 8th, February 2015.

World Bank. Small vs. young firms across the world: contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2011;5631.

Naude W, Siegel M, Marchand K. Migration, entrepreneurship, and development: critical questions. IZA J Migration. 2017;6(1):1-16.

United Nations. The number of international migrants worldwide reaches 232 million. New York: Population Facts 2013/2, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2013.

Adams RH, Page J. International migration, remittances, and poverty in developing countries. World Bank Publications. 2003;3179.

Adams Jr, RH, Page J. Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries? World Development. 2005;33(10):1645-69.

Honig B. What determines success? Examining the human, financial, and social capital of Jamaican micro-entrepreneurs. J Business Venturing. 1998;13(5):371-94.

Lin N, Ensel WM, Vaughn JC. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. Am Sociological Review. 1981;393-405.

Portes A. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann Review Sociol. 1998;24(1):1-24.

Archer M. Self-employment and occupational structure in an industrializing city: Detroit, 1880. Social Forces. 1991;69(3):785-809.

Bailey T, Waldinger R. The changing ethnic/racial division of labor. Dual City: Restructuring New York. 1991;43-78.

Bates T. Social resources generated by group support networks may not be beneficial to Asian immigrant-owned small businesses. Social Forces. 1994;72(3):671-89.

Bates T, Dunham CR. Asian-American success in self-employment. Economic Development Quarterly. 1993;7(2):199-214.

Borjas GJ. The self-employment experience of immigrants. NBER working papers 1942. National Bureau Economic Res. 1986;1-31.

Flap HD. Creation and returns of social capital. La Revue Tocqueville. 1999;20:1-22.

De Graaf ND, Flap HD. With a little help from my friends: Social resources as an explanation of occupational status and income in West Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. Social Forces. 1988;67;452-72.

Sanders JM, Nee V. Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. Am Sociological Review. 1996;61:231-49.

Light I. Immigrant and ethnic enterprise in North America. Ethnic Racial Studies. 1984;7(2):195-216.

Logan JR, Alba RD, McNulty TL. Ethnic economies in metropolitan regions: Miami and beyond. Social forces. 1994;72(3):691-724.

Sanders JM, Nee V. Limits of ethnic solidarity in the enclave economy. Am Sociological Review. 1987;52:45-73.

Davidsson P, Honig B. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Business venturing. 2003;18(3):301-31.

Cope J, Jack S, Rose MB. Social capital and entrepreneurship: An introduction. Int Small Business J. 2007;25(3):213-9.

Suwannapisit T, Apiratpinyo S. Social Capital: A Tool for Thai Entrepreneurs to Start Business Venture in Sweden: A qualitative study of how Thai entrepreneurs utilize social capital in their business venture creation process in Sweden. 2010;1-63.

Light I, Bonacich E. Immigrant Entrepreneurs. Koreans in Los Angeles. 1965-1982. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1988.

Leonard K, Tibrewal CS. Asian Indians in southern California: occupations and ethnicity. Immigration and entrepreneurship: Culture, capital, and ethnic networks. 1993;141-62.

Portes A, Zhou M. Gaining the upper hand: Economic mobility among immigrant and domestic minorities. Ethnic Racial Studies. 1992;15(4):491-522.

Williams CC, Gurtoo A. Evaluating competing theories of street entrepreneurship: some lessons from a study of street vendors in Bangalore, India. Int Entrepreneurship Management J. 2012;8(4):391-409.

Bhowmik SK. Hawkers in the urban informal sector: A study of street vendors in seven cities. 2001. Available at: http://www.karmayog.com/hawkers/ hawkersnasvi.htmL. Accessed on 8th March 2018.

Bhowmik SK. Street vending in urban India: the struggle for recognition. In Cross JC, Morales A (Eds.), Street entrepreneurs: people, place and politics in local and global perspective. London: Routledge. 2007;89-123.

Singh DP. Employment situation in Mumbai: An analysis. Berlin, Germany. 2010;3-4.

NSSO. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India 2007-08, NSS 64th round (July 2007-June 2008), New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. 2010.

Bhagat RB, Jones GW. Demographic Dynamics of Mega-Urban Regions: The Case of Mumbai. Demography India. 2014;43(1-2):71-94.

Government of India. Ministry of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation and Ministry of Urban Development, Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban renewal Mission (JNNURM) Toolkits, New Delhi: 2005.