A short responsive interaction scale: construction and preliminary reliability and validity

Authors

  • Shelina Bhamani Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Aliya Merchant Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sanober Nadeem Aga Khan Health Services, Pakistan
  • Aliza Imran Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Kiran Aslam Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Anita Attaullah Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Areeba Syed Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sara Sheikh Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Misbah Shams Department of Obstericts and Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20241166

Keywords:

Early childhood development, Responsive interactions, Responsive caregiving, Parenting

Abstract

 

Background: Responsive interactions among caregivers and newborns are essential for positive and optimal growth and development. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to develop and validate a short responsive interaction tool (SRIS) to assess caregiver responsiveness of newly delivered mothers.

Methods: The SRIS consists of twenty elements that are used to classify new-born handling, interactions, consoling techniques, engagement, and distress. High reliability and internal consistency were shown in the data gathered from 257 mothers (Cronbach's alpha=0.8354). The scale's one-dimensional structure was discovered through construct validity analysis, demonstrating the consistency of the scale's evaluation of response interactions.

Results: The results indicate that the valid and reliable instrument for gauging the responsiveness of caregivers during their initial contact with neonates. It provides a useful and approachable method with possible uses in healthcare settings and research for evidence-based parenting interventions.

Conclusions: To improve the tool's generalizability and usefulness in fostering early childhood development and parental engagement, further research is necessary to validate it across a variety of contexts.

 

References

Hentschel E, Yousafzai AK, Aboud FE. Indicators for measuring responsive care and early learning activities. Nurtur Care Early Childhood Developm. 2018.

Madigan S, Wade M, Plamondon A, Browne D, Jenkins JM. Birth weight variability and language development: Risk, resilience, and Responsive Parenting. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40(9):869-77.

Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, Andersen CT, DiGirolamo AM, Lu C, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):77-90.

Trude ACB, Richter LM, Behrman JR, Stein AD, Menezes AMB, Black MM, et al. Effects of responsive caregiving and learning opportunities during pre-school ages on the association of early adversities and adolescent human capital: an analysis of birth cohorts in two middle-income countries. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(1):37-46.

Scherer E, Hagaman A, Chung E, Rahman A, O'Donnell K, Maselko J. The relationship between responsive caregiving and child outcomes: evidence from direct observations of mother-child dyads in Pakistan. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):252.

Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, 2007. Available at: http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu/. Accessed on 01 March 2024.

White M. Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12223.

Blair C, Raver CC, Berry DJ, Family Life Project Investigators. Two approaches to estimating the effect of parenting on the development of executive function in early childhood. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(2):554-65.

Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Jump Norman V, Christiansen K. Parenting interactions with children: Checklist of observations linked to outcomes (PICCOLO) in diverse ethnic groups. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):290-306.

Comfort M, Gordon PR. The Keys to Interactive Parenting Scale (KIPS): A practical observational assessment of parenting behavior. NHSA Dialog: A Res-To-Prac J for the Early Interv Field. 2006;9(1):22-48.

Nugent JK, Bartlett JD, Von Ende A, Valim C. The effects of the newborn behavioral observations (NBO) system on sensitivity in mother-infant interactions. Inf Young Child. 2017;30(4):257-68.

Chung FF, Wan GH, Kuo SC, Lin KC, Liu HE. Mother-infant interaction quality and sense of parenting competence at six months postpartum for first-time mothers in Taiwan: a multiple time series design. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):365.

Rasheed MA, Yousafzai AK. The development and reliability of an observational tool for assessing mother-child interactions in field studies- experience from Pakistan. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):1161-71.

Svanberg PO, Barlow J, Tigbe W. The parent-infant interaction observation scale: reliability and validity of a screening tool. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31(1):5-14.

Ip P, Tso W, Rao N, Ho FKW, Chan KL, Fu KW, et al. Rasch validation of the Chinese parent-child interaction scale (CPCIS). World J Pediatr. 2018;14(3):238-46.

Bayoğlu B, Unal Ö, Elibol F, Karabulut E, Innocenti MS. Turkish validation of the PICCOLO (Parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes). Infant Ment Health J 2013;34(4):330-8.

Rohner RP. The parental "acceptance-rejection syndrome": universal correlates of perceived rejection. Am Psychol. 2004;59(8):830-40.

Gershoff ET. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(4):539-79.

Barber BK, Stolz HE, Olsen JA. Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2005;70(4):1-137.

Amato PR, Fowler F. Parenting practices, child adjustment, and family diversity. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(3):703-16.

Nadeem S, Rafique G, Khowaja L, Yameen A. Assessing home environment for early child development in Pakistan. Child Care Pract. 2014;20(2):194-206.

Rhee KE, Dickstein S, Jelalian E, Boutelle K, Seifer R, Wing R. Development of the General Parenting Observational Scale to assess parenting during family meals. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:49.

Fuligni AS, Brooks-Gunn J. Mother-child interactions in Early Head Start: Age and ethnic differences in low-income dyads. Parenting. 2013;13(1):1-26.

Crittenden PM. CARE-Index: Infant coding manual. Miami, FL: Miami Institute; 2007.

Wutich A, McCarty C. Social networks and infant feeding in Oaxaca, Mexico. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(2):121-35.

Cabrera NJ, Karberg E, Malin JL, Aldoney D. The magic of play: low-income mothers’and fathers’playfulness and children's emotion regulation and vocabulary skills. Infant Ment Health J. 2017;38(6):757-71.

Anme T, Shinohara R, Sugisawa Y, Tong L, Tanaka E, Watanabe T, et al. Gender differences of children's social skills and parenting using Interaction Rating Scale (IRS). Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):260-8.

Kristensen IH, Juul S, Kronborg H. What are the effects of supporting early parenting by newborn behavioral observations (NBO)? A cluster randomised trial. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):107.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Bhamani, S., Merchant, A., Nadeem, S., Imran, A., Aslam, K., Attaullah, A., Syed, A., Sheikh, S., & Shams, M. (2024). A short responsive interaction scale: construction and preliminary reliability and validity. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 11(5), 1768–1776. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20241166

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles