Mechanical properties and clinical significance of orthodontic wires

Authors

  • Mohamed Ali Sawas North Jeddah Specialist Dental Center, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammed Ahmed Al Nassir General Dentist, King Fahad Hospital, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Lojain Mohammed Nayas Primary Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Meshari Nasser Alabdulkarim College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Farah Youssef Faden Dental Department, Dent Clinics, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Almaha Saud Alghamlas College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Hussein Masoud Alqahtani General Dentist, Prince Sultan Armed Forces Hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia
  • Reham Ahmad Alaboodi College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
  • Nermeen Saad Felemban General Dentist, Ministry of Health, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
  • Ebtisam Salman Al Saeed Primary Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Qatif, Saudi Arabia
  • Dema Khalid Abu Ghaliah General Dentist, Al Shakreen Private Clinic, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20220047

Keywords:

Orthodontic wires, Mechanical properties, Orthodontics, Clinical application

Abstract

Orthodontic treatment is usually conducted by applying forces to certain teeth to move them into a targeted position. Orthodontic wires have been reported to be the primary modalities used in fixed-appliances-based orthodontic treatment to induce favorable tooth movement events. Accordingly, acquiring adequate knowledge about these approaches' clinical applications and biochemical behavior is essential when planning for a successful orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic wires are widely used and are mainly composed of composites, polymers, alloys and metals. Accordingly, the physical properties and clinical application of orthodontic wires vary based on their composition. In this context, it was recommended that achieving favorable outcomes of orthodontic treatment obliges clinicians to decide the best orthodontic wire and treatment plan based on the chemical properties and related clinical applications of each wire. Therefore, wires that tend to produce increasing stiffness gradually are generally used. However, it should be noted that no ideal wire exists. Therefore, favoring the application of a wire over the other should be based on the intended outcomes and stage of the treatment process.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Houston WJB, Stephens C, Tulley WJ, Foster M. A textbook of orthodontics. Wright Publishers; 1992.

Shetty V, Caridad JM, Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ. Biomechanical rationale for surgical-orthodontic expansion of the adult maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(7):742-9.

Holberg C, Holberg N, Rudzki-Janson I. Sutural strain in orthopedic headgear therapy: a finite element analysis. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2008;134(1):53-9.

Leach HA, Ireland AJ, Whaites EJ. Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in relation to orthodontics. Brit Dent J. 2001;190(1):16-22.

Rudolph DJ, Willes PMG, Sameshima GT. A finite element model of apical force distribution from orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthodont. 2001;71(2):127-31.

Mistakidis I, Gkantidis N. Review of properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Hell Orthod Rev. 2011;14:45-66.

Sharmila R. Wires in orthodontics-a short review. J Pharmaceut Sci Res. 2016;8(8):895-7.

Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthodont. 2002;36(10):553-68.

Drake SR, Wayne DM, Powers JM, Asgar K. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires in tension, bending, and torsion. Am J Orthodont. 1982;82(3):206-10.

Kusy RP, Greenberg AR. Effects of composition and cross section on the elastic properties of orthodontic wires. Angle Orthodont. 1981;51(4):325-41.

Zufall SW, Kusy RP. Stress relaxation and recovery behaviour of composite orthodontic archwires in bending. Eur J Orthodont. 2000;22(1):1-12.

Ingram SB, Gipe DP, Smith RJ. Comparative range of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1986;90(4):296-307.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.

Adams DM, Powers JM, Asgar K. Effects of brackets and ties on stiffness of an arch wire. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1987;91(2):131-6.

Sebanc J, Brantley WA, Pincsak JJ, Conover JP. Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. Am J Orthodont. 1984;86(1):43-51.

Gioka C, Eliades T. Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2004;125(3):323-8.

Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthodont. 2008;30(3):233-8.

Archambault A, Major TW, Carey JP, Heo G, Badawi H, Major PW. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthodont. 2010;80(5):884-9.

Partowi S, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Experimental analysis of torque characteristics of orthodontic wires. J Orofac Orthoped. 2010;71(5):362-72.

Burstone CJ. Variable-modulus orthodontics. Am J Orthodont. 1981;80(1):1-16.

Rucker BK, Kusy RP. Elastic flexural properties of multistranded stainless steel versus conventional nickel titanium archwires. Angle Orthodont. 2002;72(4):302-9.

Garrec P, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Evolution of flexural rigidity according to the cross-sectional dimension of a superelastic nickel titanium orthodontic wire. Eur J Orthodont. 2005;27(4):402-7.

Kusy RP. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. Angle Orthodont. 1997;67(3):197-207.

Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire--a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthodont. 1985;87(6):445-52.

Rucker BK, Kusy RP. Elastic properties of alternative versus single-stranded leveling archwires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2002;122(5):528-41.

Johnson E. Relative stiffness of beta titanium archwires. Angle Orthodont. 2003;73(3):259-69.

Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory and clinical analyses of nitinol wire. Am J Orthodont. 1978;73(2):142-51.

Oliver RG. Orthodontic materials. Scientific and clinical aspects. J Orthodont. 2002;29(1):75.

Verstrynge A, Humbeeck J, Willems G. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2006;130(4):460-70.

Krishnan V, Kumar KJ. Weld characteristics of orthodontic archwire materials. Angle Orthodont. 2004;74(4):533-8.

Bartzela TN, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthodont. 2007;77(6):991-8.

Kusy RP, Stevens LE. Triple-stranded stainless steel wires--evaluation of mechanical properties and comparison with titanium alloy alternatives. Angle Orthodont. 1987;57(1):18-32.

Evans TJ, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Clinical comparison and performance perspective of three aligning arch wires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1998;114(1):32-9.

West AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1995;108(5):464-71.

Wang Y, Jian F, Lai W. Initial arch wires for alignment of crooked teeth with fixed orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Systemat Rev. 2010;4:7859.

Riley M, Bearn DR. A systematic review of clinical trials of aligning archwires. J Orthodont. 2009;36(1):42-51.

Kapila S, Sachdeva R. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1989;96(2):100-9.

Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2002;122(3):295-305.

Hamdan A, Rock P. The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction. Eur J Orthodont. 2008;30(5):508-14.

Articolo LC, Kusy K, Saunders CR, Kusy RP. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment. Eur J Orthodont. 2000;22(4):409-25.

Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2009;135(4):442-7.

Swartz ML. Fact or friction: the clinical relevance of in vitro steady-state friction studies. J Clin Orthodont. 2007;41(8):427-32.

Kusy RP, Mims L, Whitley JQ. Mechanical characteristics of various tempers of as-received cobalt-chromium archwires. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 2001;119(3):274-91.

Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1990;98(2):117-26.

Krishnan V, Kumar KJ. Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys. Angle Orthodont. 2004;74(6):825-31.

Cash A, Curtis R, Garrigia-Majo D, McDonald F. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets. Eur J Orthodont. 2004;26(1):105-11.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-28

How to Cite

Sawas, M. A., Nassir, M. A. A., Nayas, L. M., Alabdulkarim, M. N., Faden, F. Y., Alghamlas, A. S., Alqahtani, H. M., Alaboodi, R. A., Felemban, N. S., Saeed, E. S. A., & Ghaliah, D. K. A. (2022). Mechanical properties and clinical significance of orthodontic wires. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 9(2), 932–936. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20220047

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022): February 2022

Section

Review Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC