Modeling the risk of age-related macular degeneration and its predictive comparisons in a population in South India

Authors

  • Sannapaneni Krishnaiah Health Promotion Division, Public Health Foundation of India, Delhi NCR, Gurgaon-22003, Haryana
  • Bapi Raju Surampudi School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad-500046, Telangana International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT), Hyderabad-500032, Telangana
  • Jill Keeffe Department of Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne-8002, VIC

Keywords:

Artificial neural network, Logistic regression model, Age-related macular degeneration, Population-based cross-sectional study, Risk score, South India

Abstract

Background: Objective of current study was to develop and cross-validate the prediction models for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) by using Logistic Regression (LR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN).

Methods:A population based cross-sectional epidemiologic study. The data (n=3723) were analyzed on participants aged ≥40 years in Andhra Pradesh, South India. Sub-population data from this sample was drawn by using random under sampling and random over sampling techniques to derive a risk score from the LR model. The models were compared for their predictive abilities by an Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC).

Results:The LR risk score was built with a score ranging from 0 to 60 for a sub-population dataset (n=213). A cut-off score of ≥30 had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 69%. The predictive performance of ANN and LR was statistically equivalent (76% vs. 78%; P = 0.624). Both the models were stable and consistently obtained the same predictive accuracies in a 30-fold split-sample cross validation.

Conclusions:The sensitivity analysis of the ANN model indicated the relative importance of prioritizing modifiable risk factors for AMD in order to base preventive interventions to reduce the impact of the modifiable factors on AMD.

References

Finne P, Finne R, Stenman UH. Neural network analysis of clinicopathological factors in urological disease: a critical evaluation of available techniques. Br J U Int. 2001;88:825-31.

Krishnaiah S, Das TP, Nirmalan PK, Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, et al. Risk Factors for age-related macular degeneration: findings from the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4442-9.

Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K, Prasad MN, et al. Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:908-16.

Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Nanda A, McCarty CA. Design of a population study of visually impairment in India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997;45:251-7.

Dandona L, Dandona R, Naduvilath TJ, McCarty CA, Nanda A, Srinivas M, et al. Is eye-care-policy focus almost exclusively on cataract adequate to deal with blindness in India? Lancet. 1998;21:1312-6.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Logistic regression. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, eds. Statistics in Medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1989;10:1162-3.

Spiegelhalter DJ. Probabilistic prediction in patient management and clinical trials. Stat Med. 1986;5(5):421-33.

Aday LA. Bivariable analysis. In: Aday LA, eds. Designing & Conducting Health Surveys. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers; 1996.

Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Linseisen J, Rohrmann S, Möhlig M, et al. An accurate risk score based on anthropometric, dietary, and lifestyle factors to predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:510-5.

Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back propagation error. Nature. 1986;323;533-6.

Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R. Neural networks and the bias/valance dilemma. Neural Comput. 1992;4:1-58.

Garson GD. Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artif Intell Expert. 1991;6:47-51.

Chang-ping LI, Xin-yue ZHI, Jun MA, Cui Z, Zhu ZL, Zhang C, et al. Performance comparison between logistic regression, decision trees, and multilayer perceptron in predicting peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin Med J. 2012;125(5):851-7.

Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL, DeMets DL. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: the relation of age-related maculopathy to smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:190-200.

Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR. Smoking and age-related maculopathy. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1518-23.

Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. Age-related macular degeneration and smoking. The Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1193-6.

Miyazaki M, Nakamura H, Kubo M, Kiyohara Y, Oshima Y, Ishibashi T, et al. Risk factors for age related maculopathy in a Japanese population: the Hisayama Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:469-72.

Xu L, Li Y, Zheng Y, Jonas JB. Associated factors for age related maculopathy in the adult population in China: the Beijing Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1080-90.

Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The relationship of foodary carotenoid and vitamins A, E, and C Intake with AMD in a case control study: AREDS Report No 22. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(9):1225-32.

Despriet DD, Klaver CC, Witteman JC, Bergen AA, Kardys I, de Maat MP, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism, complement activators, and risk of age-related macular degeneration. JAMA. 2006;296:301-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-04

How to Cite

Krishnaiah, S., Surampudi, B. R., & Keeffe, J. (2017). Modeling the risk of age-related macular degeneration and its predictive comparisons in a population in South India. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 2(2), 137–148. Retrieved from https://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/938

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles