Prevalence and factors influencing anaemia among pregnant women in rural Mysuru, India
Keywords:Anemia, Pregnant women, Rural health
Background: Anaemia in pregnancy is one of the major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in India and the world. Determining the status and factors influencing anaemia among pregnant women in rural areas is essential to treat as well as prevent the same. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of anaemia among pregnant women of rural areas of Mysuru, India and to determine the factors influencing anaemia among the study participants.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the villages under PHCs of Hadinaru and Suttur of Nanjangud Taluk, Mysuru district, India for a period of 18 months. A total of 300 pregnant women residing in these villages, and consenting to participate were included in the study. A structured proforma was used to collect sociodemographic details. Haemoglobin was estimated using Sahli’s haemoglobinometer and type of anaemia was determined by peripheral blood smear. The data was entered using Epi Data v3.1 software, and analyzed using R statistical Software v3.0.2.
Results: The prevalence of anaemia was 51%, majority had mild anaemia (37%). 79% of the study participants were aged 20-29 years, 85% studied upto High school, 83% belonged to lower Socioeconomic class and 66% lived in joint families. The important factors influencing anaemia were poor nutrition (49%), low socioeconomic status (39%) and open defecation (51%).
Conclusions: More than half of the pregnant women were anaemic. Also, majority of the anaemic women had mild anaemia, which showed the positive impact of MCH services. The factors influencing anaemia which have been identified in this study need to be addressed to reduce the burden of anaemia among pregnant women in our country.
Balgir R, Panda J, Panda A, Ray M. A Cross sectional study of Anemia in Pregnant women of Eastern coast of Odisha. Tribal Health Bull. 2011;17(1):1-7.
Siteti CM. Anaemia in Pregnancy: Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors in Kakamega County, Kenya. Sci J Public Health. 2014;2(3):216.
WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2011. [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin.pdf
De Benoist B. World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005 of WHO Global Database of anaemia Geneva: World Health Organization. 2008. [cited 2015 Jun 21]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ publications/ 2008/ 9789241596657_eng.pdf
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3). Mumbai: IIPS. 2007.
Kalaivani K. Prevalence & consequences of anaemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(5):627-33.
Toteja G, Singh P, Dhillon B, Saxena B, Ahmed F, Singh R. Prevalence of Anemia among pregnant women and adolescent girls in 16 districts of India. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27(4):311-5.
Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofac Sci. 2006;1(1):9-14.
Lauritsen J, Bruus M. Epi Data. A comprehensive tool for validated entry and documentation of data. The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark. 2005.
Fox J. The R Commander: A Basic Statistics Graphical User Interface to R. J Stat Softw. 2005;14(9):1-42.
Noronha JA, Bhaduri A, Bhat HV. Prevalence of anaemia among pregnant women: a community-based study in udupi district. Health Popul-Perspect Issues. 2008;31(1):31-40.
Ahmad N. The prevalence of anaemia and associated factors in rural Indian community. Australas Med J. 2010;276-80.
Ivan EA. Evaluation of Anaemia in Booked Antenatal Mothers During the Last Trimester. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2013;7(11):2487-90.
Panigrahi A, Sahoo P. Nutritional anemia and its epidemiological correlates among women of reproductive age in an urban slum of Bhubaneswar, Orissa. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(4):317-20.