Prevalence of distress symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic- a comparative community study from South India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210841Keywords:
Community study, Comparative community, COVID-19, DASS21, Depression, PsychologicalAbstract
Background: After the reported first case of COVID-19, all the existed preventive measures were augmented in the country.2The state had a lockdown from 23 March 2020 onwards with various phases of unlocking. The study aimed to compare the mental health symptoms among urban and rural populations experiencing the pandemic and lockdowns.
Methods: This was a community-based cross-sectional study done in the Trichirapalli district in south India. 503 participants were selected by random sampling stratified for gender, rural area, urban area, and age. The study was done in June and July 2020 with the Depression anxiety stress scale (DASS21) questionnaire.
Results: The DASS21 questionnaire elicited depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and stress symptoms. The prevalence of nil symptoms among the study population was 26.2%, 4.6% had any one symptom, 12.5% had any two symptoms, 56.7% had all three symptoms. Among the depressive symptoms, 8.3% had mild, 13.3% moderate, 6.6% severe, and 1.4% extremely severe symptoms. 10.5% had mild symptoms, 15.9% moderate, 4.6% severe, and 6% extremely severe anxiety symptoms. About 8% experienced mild symptoms, 5.2% moderate, 2.2% severe, and 0.2% extremely stress symptoms. Age less than or equal to 42 years had twice the odds OR 2.02, 95% CI (1.328 to 3.074) of having three symptoms. The rural population had twice OR 2.32, 95% CI (1.526 to 3.540) the odds of having all three symptoms. The upper socioeconomic status (SES) had 0.384 times lesser odds of developing all three symptoms and is a protective factor with OR 0.616, 95% CI (0.397 to 0.956).
Conclusions: The rural population, age less than or equal to 42 years had high odds of having all three symptoms of distress. The high-income group had less odds of having the symptoms compared to other income groups.
References
IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Corona virus (2019-nCoV), Available at: https://www.who.int/ dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement -on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-corona-virus-(2019-ncov). Accessed on 15 September 2020.
TN Covid19 Public Dashboard. Available from: https://nhmtn.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/095ad0a1c0254b058fa36b32d1ab1977. Accessed on 15 September 2020.
Corona virus Outbreak in Tamil Nadu- covid19india.org, Available from: https://www.covid19india.org/state/TN. Accessed on 15 September 2020.
Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 corona virus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1729.
Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatr Res. 2020;287:112934.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43.
National Family Health Survey (NHFS-4) India. Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs. Accessed on 16 September 2020.
Dhrubajyoti J Debnath RK. Modified BG Prasad Socio-economic Classification. Indian J Community Health. 2020;32:124-5.
Chennai MSME Development Institute. Government of India Ministry of MSME: District Industrial Profile Trichy. 2019-20;10-11.
Schneider D, Harknett K, McLanahan S. Intimate partner violence in the great recession. Demography. 2016;53:471-505.
Komarovsky M, Kimmel M. The unemployed man and his family. AltaMira Press; 2004.
Radhakrishnan V, Sen S, Singaravelu N. Domestic violence complaints at a 10-year high during COVID-19 lockdown- The Hindu. Available from: https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-domestic-violence-complaints-at-a-10-year-high-during-covid-19-lockdown/article31885001.ece. Accessed on 16 September 2020.
Ramasubramanian V, Mohandoss AA, Rajendhiran G, Pandian PR, Ramasubramanian C. Statewide survey of psychological distress among people of Tamil Nadu in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020;42(4):368-73.
Stanton R, To QG, Khalesi S. Depression, anxiety and stress during COVID-19: Associations with changes in physical activity, sleep, tobacco and alcohol use in Australian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1-13.
Aldwin CM, Sutton KJ, Chiara G, Spiro A. Age differences in stress, coping, and appraisal: findings from the normative aging study. J Gerontol Series B. 1996;51(4):P179-88.
Kosidou K, Dalman C, Lundberg M, Hallqvist J, Isacsson G, Magnusson C. Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: a population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1-3):160-7..
Lazzarino AI, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Low socioeconomic status and psychological distress as synergistic predictors of mortality from stroke andcoronary heart disease. Psychosomat Med. 2013;75:311.
