Biological false positive rapid plasma reagin tests in pregnant females in North India

Authors

  • Somanpreet Kaur Sahota
  • Barun Kumar Shakya
  • Deepak Arora
  • Neeraj Jindal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210803

Keywords:

Antenatal screening, BFP reactions, Hi-Quik test, Pregnant females, RPR test, Syphilis

Abstract

Background: Syphilis, a sexually transmitted disease seriously complicate pregnancy and produce harmful results in fetus. Screening of pregnant females in early pregnancy with non-treponemal tests such as RPR and VDRL is a cost effective strategy for diagnosis of syphilis. However, these tests could produce BFP reaction in pregnancy. The prevalence of which may be different in different populations and at different times. The current prevalence of the biological false positive rapid plasma regain tests in pregnant females of North India was there for assessed and being reported.

Methods: A total 500 consecutive pregnant females who presented to our tertiary care center for the first time were screened for syphilis by RPR (a non-treponemal test) and Hi-Quik (a treponemal test) after obtaining their written consent.

Results: Of the 500 females 21 (4.2%) were RPR positive and only one (0.2%) was Hi-Quik positive. Thus the prevalence of biological false positive rapid plasma regain tests in pregnant females of North India was 4% (20/500). In semi quantitative RPR, these tests were positive in ≤1:4 dilution and were not found to be related to any particular age, geographical distribution, literacy status, occupation or period of gestation (p value >0.05) and were transient in nature.

Conclusions: Our study concludes that although RPR is a good, cost effective test for mass screening of pregnant females, but it produces BFP reactions in considerable percentage (4%) in pregnant females of North India.

References

Maves RC, Dean K, Gadea N, Halsey ES, Graf PC, Lescano AG. False-positive rapid plasma reagin testing in patients with acute Plasmodium vivax malaria: a case control study. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12(3):268-73.

Genç M, Ledger WJ. Syphilis in pregnancy. Sexual Transmit Infect. 2000;76(2):73-9.

Kanungo R. Spirochetes. In: Ananthanarayan and Paniker’s Textbook of Microbiology. 10th edn. The Orient Blackswan; 2017:377-391.

Garner MF. The serodiagnosis of syphilis. Med J Australia. 1966;2(7):328-1.

Augenbraun MH, DeHovitz JA, Feldman J, Clarke L, Landesman S, Minkoff HM. Biological false-positive syphilis test results for women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19(6):1040-4.

Moore JE, Mohr CF. Biologically false positive serologic tests for syphilis: type, incidence, and cause. J Am Med Assoc. 1952;150(5):467-73.

Lubinski HH. False positive serologic reactions. Canadian Med Assoc J. 1947;57(1):33

Smikle MF, James OB, Prabhakar P. Biological false positive serological tests for syphilis in the Jamaican population. Sexual Transmit Infect. 1990;66(2):76-8.

Stone JH, Amend WJ, Criswell LA. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in renal transplantation: occurrence of clinical events in 96 consecutive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34(6):1040-7.

Geusau A, Kittler H, Hein U, Dangl-Erlach E, Stingl G, Tschachler E. Biological false-positive tests comprise a high proportion of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16(11):722-6.

Sethi S, Mewara A, Hallur V, Prasad A, Sharma K, Raj A. Rising trends of syphilis in a tertiary care center in North India. Indian J Sexual Transmit Dis AIDS. 2015;36(2):140.

Nandwani R, Evans DT. Are you sure it's syphilis? A review of false positive serology. Int J STD AIDS. 1995;6(4):241-8.

Brede HD, Willey KD, Kindermann RA, Finlayson MH. Detection of biological false positive syphilis serum reactions. SAMJ. 1974;48(6).

Shaikh NM, Mehta TK, Shah PD. Comparison of semi-quantitative RPR Test and TPHA for Serodiagnosis of Syphilis. Nat J Community Med. 2017;8(9):541-5.

Yaassa P, Bwalya CB, Hira RS, Kwenda, Kunda M, Sarenje K, et al, Quantitative RPR Test as a Guide for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Syphilis in Zambia. Int Infect Dis. 2013;1(12).

Taiwo SS, Adesiji YO, Adekanle DA. Screening for syphilis during pregnancy in Nigeria: a practice that must continue. Sexual Transmit Infect. 2007;83(5):357-8.

Mehta KD, Antala S, Mistry M, Goswami Y. Seropositivity of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, and HIV in antenatal women in India. J Infect Dev Countries. 2013;7(11):832-7.

Wiwanitkit V. Biological false reactive VDRL tests: when to re-test? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;33:131-2.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-24

How to Cite

Sahota, S. K., Shakya, B. K., Arora, D., & Jindal, N. (2021). Biological false positive rapid plasma reagin tests in pregnant females in North India. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 8(3), 1217–1220. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210803

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles