Studies on antecedent factors of persistent practice of female circumcision in Abia state, south east Nigeria

Authors

  • Udochi M. Nwosu Department of Public Health Medicine Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Abia State
  • Madu J. Awa Department of Community Medicine Gregory University, Uturu Abia State
  • Juliet U. Enukeme Department of Community Medicine Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Abia State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20151546

Keywords:

Female circumcision, Persistence, Rural communities, Abia State - Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Despite the ban of female circumcision (FC) in Nigeria in 2003, the practice has continued to persist. This study is aimed at identifying antecedent factors contributing to its persistent practice in rural communities of Nigeria and recommend ways of stopping the practice completely.

Methods:A Multi-stage probability sampling method was used in selecting ten rural communities in Isiala Ngwa South Local Area of Abia State, South East Nigeria. A total of 4303 mothers of female children were enumerated. A sample size of 860 mothers was systematically selected. Instrument for data collection was a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: Socio-demographic and economic factors that significantly contribute to persistent practice of FC include; age of mothers, occupation, level of education and monthly income (P<0.005). Other antecedent factors are lack of awareness of health consequences of FC, local tradition and cultural imperative, illusory fears, perceived belief and rationalization.  About 63.2% of respondents opined that the best way to stop the practice is through health education and promotion campaign at the grass root to increase knowledge and awareness of FC and its adverse health implications.

Conclusions:Several factors contributed to persistent practice of FC and ranging from socio-demographic and economic factors to ignorance and rationalization. These factors can be addressed by promoting health education and awareness campaign and strict enforcement of the ban through prosecution of offenders.

 

References

Ofor MO, Ofole NM. Female Genital Mutilation: The Place of Culture and the Debilitating Effects on the Dignity of the Female Gender. European scientific J. 2015;11(4):112-21.

Long-John ME, Akpan EA. Practice and outcome of Female genital cutting in abua-odual local government area, river state, Nigeria (1999-2000). African J. Public Hlth. 2007;1(1): 29-35.

Ibekwe PC, Onoh RC, Onyebuchi ZK, Ezeonu PO, Ibekwe RO. Female Genital Mutilation in South-East Nigeria: A Survey on the Current Knowledge and Practice. J Public Hlth and Epidemiology. 2012;4(5):117-22.

Yerima TF, Atidoga DF. Eradicating the Practice of Female Circumcision/Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria within the context of Human Rights. J Law, Policy and Globalization. 2014;28:129-40.

World Health Organization. Female Genital Mutilation: WHO Media Centre. Fact Sheet No. 241. World Health Organization WHO; 2010.

WHO. “Understanding and Addressing Violence against Women Female Genital Mutilation”. WHO; 2012.

WHO: Female Genital Mutilation. Fact Sheet N0 241, 2014. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/updated February 2014. Accessed 13 October 2015

Abiodun AA, Benjamin OA, Obalowu J. “Female Circumcision in Nigeria: Prevalence and Attitudes:” Centre point Journal (Science Edition). 2011;17(2):89-98.

Kolawole AOD, Anke VDK. “A Review of Determinant of Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria” J Med and Med Scien. 2012;1(11). Available at www.interestjournals.org/JMMS. Accessed 27 July 2015.

Ahmadi BA. An Analytical Approach to Female Genital Mutilation in West Africa. International J of Women’s Research. 2013;3(1):37-56.

Okeke TC, Anyachie USB, Ezenyeaku CCK. An overview of female genital mutilation in Nigeria. Ann. Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2(1):70-3.

AID (Amnesty International Document), 2013a. Available at http://www.endfgm.eu/en/female-genital-mutilation/what-is-fgm/what-is-fgm. Accessed 13 October 2015.

AID (Amnesty International Document), 2013b. Available at http://www.endfgm.eu/en/female-genital-mutilation/what-is-fgm/where-is-it practised. Accessed 13 October 2015.

AID (Amnesty International Document), 2013c. Available at http://www.endfgm.eu/en/female-genital-mutilation/what-is-fgm/how-is-it-practised. Accessed 13 October 2015.

AID (Amnesty International Document), 2013d. Available at http://www.endfgm.eu/en/female-genital-mutilation/what-is-fgm/effects-of-fgm. Accessed 13 October 2015.

AID (Amnesty International Document), 2013e. Available at http://www.endfgm.eu/en/female-genital-mutilation/what-is-fgm/why-is-it-practised. Accessed 13 October 2015.

World Health Organization (WHO): Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An Interagency Statement. World Health Organization. WHO; 2008.

FMECD Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperator and Development 2011. Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany; 2011.

Drummer L. Magic & Ritual Abuse: Female circumcision in central and Western African, 2010. Available at http://dragonheadmusic.com/africanwomendjembefola/2010. Accessed 15 October 2015.

HRW (Human Rights Watch). Iraqi Kurdistan: Law Banning FGM not being Enforced, Human Right Watch; 2012.

Gulf News (June 15, 2012) “Georgia: Man Convicted in Daughter’s Mutilation” Associated Press; 2012.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Nwosu, U. M., Awa, M. J., & Enukeme, J. U. (2017). Studies on antecedent factors of persistent practice of female circumcision in Abia state, south east Nigeria. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 3(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20151546

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles