DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20195839

A community based comparative study on gender perceptions among married (reproductive age) women of rural and urban areas of district Gautam Buddha Nagar

Amit Singh Pawaiya, Khushboo Juneja, Ajay Kumar Jha, Tuhina Shree, Ankita Makhija, Ieshitva Jain, S. Nagesh

Abstract


Background: The preference for a son over female offspring continues to be a prevailing norm within the ancient Indian family. Sons are expected to work within the fields, give bigger financial gain and look after parents. Additionally, in Indian patriarchal society, sons are a unit responsible for the preservation of the family name. The preference for a son and female feticide continues to be a prevailing norm in ancient Indian families (urban and rural) leading to declining sex ratio to an alarming level. With this background the following study was conducted in Gautam Buddha Nagar with the objective of finding out gender bias in rural and urban area.

Methods: A study was carried out in rural and urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine, district Gautam Buddha Nagar of Uttar Pradesh. The study was conducted among 270 married women of reproductive age group. The women were interviewed using a semi structure questionnaire.

Results: More than half of the respondents in the rural areas (57.7%) preferred son while in the urban areas, 43% of women preferred a son. The most important reason for preferring a son in the rural area was a support to the parents. While in urban area son was preferred because of the continuation of a family line.

Conclusions: Preference for son was found to be high. Further amendments in the existing laws and quality education may help in breaking gender stereotypes and minimizing gender bias. 


Keywords


Women, Sex ratio, Gender preference, Rural, Urban, Gautam Buddha Nagar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Uttar Pradesh Population 2011-2019 Census. Uttar Pradesh population sex ratio in Uttar Pradesh data 2011-2019. Available at: http://www.census2011 .co.in/census/state/uttar+pradesh.html. Accessed on 28 November 2019.

Gautam Buddha Nagar (Gautam Buh Nagar) District Population Census 2011-2019, Uttar Pradesh literacy sex ratio and density. Available at: http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/512-gautam-buddha-nagar.html. Accessed on 28 November 2019.

Yadav JU, Yadav DJ. Ultrasonography awareness among pregnant women attending medical college hospital in Kolhapur District of Maharashtra, India. Intl J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(6):2612.

Government of India (GOI). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act, 2003. Available at: http://rajs wasthya.nic.in/PCPNDT%2005.12.08/Hand%20book%20with%20Act%20&%20Rules%20%285%29%20%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed on 14 April 2019.

Sustainable development goals. SDGs, Transforming our world: the. 2030 agenda, 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainable develop ment/gender-equality/. Accessed on 20 March 2019.

National Family Health Survey-4 (2015-16), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. International Institute of Population Sciences. 2017. Available at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf. Accessed on 21 January 2018.

Singh T, Sharma S, Nagesh S. Socio-economic status scales updated for 2017. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(7):3264-7.

Shidhaye PR, Giri PA, Nagaonkar SN, Shidhaye RR. Study of knowledge and attitude regarding prenatal diagnostic techniques act among the pregnant women at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai. J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:36.

Mitra PS, Dasgupta M, Banerjee P, Soreng PS, Shirazee HH, Adhikari S. A Study on preferences and awareness regarding prenatal sex determination among antenatal women attending obstetrics and gynaecology outdoor of medical college, Kolkata during the time period of January to June, 2012. J Dent Med Sci. 2013;6(6):100-04.

Maroof K, Bansal R, Parashar P, Kansal R. A hospital-based study on knowledge, attitude and practice of pregnant women on gender preference, prenatal sex determination and female feticide. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54(4):209.

Roy A, Biswas R. A Study on gender preference and awareness regarding prenatal sex determination among antenatal women in a rural area of Darjeeling district, West Bengal, India. J Clin Diagnos Res. 2017;11(2):05.

Vadera BN, Joshi UK, Unadakat SV, Yadav BS, Yadav S. Study on knowledge, attitude and practices regarding gender preference and female feticide among pregnant women. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32(4):300.

Chavada M, Bhagyalaxmi A. Effect of socio-cultural factors on the preference for the sex of children by women in Ahmedabad district. Health Population: Perspectives Issues. 2009;32(4):184-9.

Manhas S, Banoo J. A study of beliefs and perceptions related to female foeticide among Muslim community in Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Studies Home Community Sci. 2013;7(2):125-30.

Das N. Sex preference and fertility behavior: a study of recent Indian data. Demography. 1987;24:517-30.

Ramesh A, Bhagwan D, Holla R, Unnikrishnan B, Thapar R, Mithra P, Kumar N, et al. Knowledge and perception towards female feticide among adolescents of coastal South India. Ntl J Comm Med. 2016;7(9):736-40.

Dhande VS, Gadekar RD, Shingare AD, Domple VK. Gender preference among reproductive age group women in rural area. Intl J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(7):1862-5.

Shrivastava S, Kariwal P, Kapilasrami MC. A community-based study on awareness and perception on gender discrimination and sex preference among married women (in reproductive age group) in a rural population of district Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Nat J Community Med. 2011;2:273-6.

Ghose S, Sarkar S. Knowledge and attitude of Prenatal Diagnostics techniques Act among the antenatal women a hospital-based study. J Community Med. 2009;5:1-6.

Pavithra MB, Dhanpal S, Lokanath H. A study of gender preference, knowledge and attitude regarding prenatal diagnostic techniques act among pregnant women in an urban slum of Bengaluru. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2:282-7.