A study on out of pocket expenditure among the urology patients covered under health schemes in a teaching hospital

Authors

  • Safiyath Asheela Department of Hospital Administration, Yenepoya Medical College, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Ghulam Jeelani Qadiri Department of Hospital Administration, Yenepoya Medical College,Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Nagaraj Shet Department of Hospital Administration, Yenepoya Medical College, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Prajna Sharma Department of Community Medicine, Kanachur Institute of Medical Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20193989

Keywords:

Urology, Health insurance, Out of pocket expenditure, Catastrophic expenditure

Abstract

Background: Health is one of the most important components of an effective poverty reduction strategy. However, use of health services is sometimes associated with out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. Urology disorders are often chronic and affect individuals not by shortening survival, but by impairing quality of life hence posing a substantial economic impact for patients. A well-planned health finance systems protects population against the financial risks of ill-health. This study addressed concerns over high levels of out-of-pocket payments even by those who have insurance coverage.

Methods: Descriptive study was conducted among 160 patients admitted in Urology Department who are covered under various health schemes for the duration of 6 months.

Results: Of the 160 study participants studied, 129 (80.62%) were males, 37 (23.13%), 64 (40%) were illiterates and most of the families 127 (79.38%) were from rural area. Various health schemes availed were, 120 (75%) Arogya Karnataka, 8 (11.25%) RBSY Kerala and 6 (3.75%) Sampoorna Suraksha. Expenses other than medical included home care assistance, adaptations to home and cost of parallel treatment. The main source for out of pocket expenditure was borrowing money from relatives or friends 70 (43.8%), self-finance 46 (28.7%) and selling valuables 28 (17.5%). Prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure in our study was 8.75%.

Conclusions: The government should increase the public health spending to reduce the out of pocket expenditure by the families and the public must be educated about the availability of insurance scheme and their efficient/optimum utilization.

References

Kaul I, Conceiçao P, Goulven KL, Mendoza RU. Providing Global Public Goods, Managing Globalization. 1st ed. Oxford Scholarship; 2003: 26. Available at www.undp.org/globalpublicgoods /globalization/toc.html. Accessed 10 April 2019.

World Health Organization. Report of the commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

McIntyre D, Thiede M, Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts?. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(4):858-65.

Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36(1):11-27.

Peters DH, Yazbeck AS, Sharma RR, Ramana GNV, Pritchett LH, Wagstaff A. Better health systems for India’s poor: Findings, analysis and options. Health, nutrition and population series. Washington, DC: World Bank group; 2002;1: 24124.

Tolla MT, Norheim OF, Verguet S, Bekele A, Amenu K, Abdisa SG, et al. Out-of-pocket expenditures for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in general and specialised cardiac hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional cohort study. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000280.

World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

Sri Lanka Institute for Health Policy Colombo, Paper for Discussion 1st May 2013. Burden of Malaria and other Infectious Diseases in the Asia and Pacific Region Prepared for Regional Malaria Financing Task Force, APLMA.

Russell S. The economic burden of illness for households in developing Countries: a review of studies focusing on malaria, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired Immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(2):147-55.

Molla AA, Chi C, Mondaca ALN. Predictors of high out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure: an analysis using Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey. 2010. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):94.

Nandi S, Schneider H, Dixit P. Hospital utilization and out of pocket expenditure in public and private sectors under the universal government health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh State, India: Lessons for universal health coverage. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187904.

Narayanan N, Kodali PB. Out of pocket health expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure among the beneficiaries of comprehensive health insurance scheme in Kerala. Int J Health Sci Res. 2018;8(9):207-14.

Aregbeshola BS, Khan SM. Out-of-pocket payments, catastrophic health expenditure and poverty among households in Nigeria 2010. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(9):798-806.

Harish BR, Siddalingappa H, Bharath J. Health insurance coverage and healthcare expenditure pattern in rural Mandya, Karnataka. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(4):1519-23.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-27

How to Cite

Asheela, S., Qadiri, G. J., Shet, N., & Sharma, P. (2019). A study on out of pocket expenditure among the urology patients covered under health schemes in a teaching hospital. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 6(9), 3892–3898. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20193989

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles