A profile on occupational health hazards among the working class of factories in an industrial area of Bengaluru

Authors

  • Chetana Srinivas Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, Karnataka
  • Priyanka Dandiganahalli Shivaram Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20192867

Keywords:

Occupational health hazards, Working class people, Factories

Abstract

Background: The occupational safety and health scenario in India is complex. The working class are victims of different occupational disorders and psychosocial stresses cause being poverty, lack of education, poor working conditions, excess working hours, etc. The morbidities include musculoskeletal disorders, generalized weakness, heart burn, endocrine disorders, injuries, etc. Hence, the present study was conducted to list the occupational health hazards of the working class of factories in an industrial area of Bangalore.

Methods: The study was conducted in various factories of an industrial area in Bangalore. Socio-demographic profile, health hazards, stress, quality of life and DALY of the study subjects was assessed using a standard, pre-structured proforma. Descriptive statistics like mean and percentages was used for data analysis.

Results: 384 subjects were included in the study. Majority being males i.e. 322 (86.4%) and aged 31 to 40 years, educated upto high school i.e. 342 (89%). The most commonly seen morbidities are diabetes mellitus (4.4%), hypertension (3.6%). Among the study subjects, 77% had no stress, 12.1% had mild stress and 10.7% had moderate level of stress. On assessing the quality of life, it was found that 83.5% were in good physical health, 77.6% had pain and symptoms, 96.8% were satisfied with their social relations and DALY assessment showed that diabetes was responsible for 28.42 years of life lost due to disability.

Conclusions: Majority of them had no stress and diabetes was the most commonly seen morbidity.

References

About NIOSH". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved. 2016.

"About OSHA". United States Department of Labor. Retrieved 2016.

Ramos AK, Carlo G, Grant KM, Bendixsen C, Fuentes A, Gamboa R. A Preliminary Analysis of Immigrant Cattle Feedyard Worker Perspectives on Job-Related Safety Training. Safety. 2018;4(3):37.

CDC - Chemical Safety - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic". Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed on 3 January 2019.

Occupational health and safety – chemical exposure. Available at: www.sbu.se. Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU). Accessed on 3 January 2019.

CDC - Stress at Work - NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic. Available at: www.cdc.gov. Accessed on 3 January 2019.

Susan Harwood Grant Products By Topic. Available at: www.osha.gov. Accessed on 3 January 2019.

Chucri K, Thais M. High Speeds, Higher Decibels". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010.

Olufunsho A. Occupational Hazards and Safety Measures Amongst the Paint Factory Workers in Lagos, Nigeria. Saf Health Work. 2014;5(2):106–11.

Viswanathan S. Occupational health and safety in chemical industries in transitional economies. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011;15(3):85–6.

Health and safety in the Construction Industry. Veritas Consulting. 11 March 2009. 2013.

CDC – NHIS – Construction Sector Profile Page – NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-28

How to Cite

Srinivas, C., & Dandiganahalli Shivaram, P. (2019). A profile on occupational health hazards among the working class of factories in an industrial area of Bengaluru. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 6(7), 3156–3159. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20192867

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles