Study the association of demographic factors and health status of construction workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20162564Keywords:
Construction workers, Kuppuswami scale, Behavioral change communicationAbstract
Background: Objectives of the study was to study socio-demographic profile of construction workers and to study association of demographic factors to health status of construction workers.
Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted at various construction sites. The study included 300 construction workers, aged >14 years and who were willing to participate in the study. Worker's Medical and occupational history was taken. Data was analysed using software Open-Epi version 2.3.1 and Microsoft Excel 2010. Chi-square test and Fisher Exact test were performed to detect he statistical significance.
Results: The mean age of workers was 28.02±8.19 years. Majority (52.33%) of the workers belonged to the age group of 15-25 years. Majority (82.67%) workers were males. 198 (66.00%) of workers were married. 224 (74.67%) belonged to Hindu religion and 60 (20%) were Muslim. 224 (74.67%) of workers were literate. Laborers constituted 204 (68%) of work force. 183 (61.00%) had duration in this occupation, less than 5 years. Majority i.e. 289 (96.33%) of the workers belonged to class IV (Upper Lower Class). Age, marital status, type of occupation and duration in the occupation are found to be significantly associated with the health of the worker.
Conclusions: Age, marital status, type of occupation and duration in the occupation are found to be significantly associated with the health status of the workers. Behavioral Change Communication activities should be actively carried out site to impart education about occupational health hazards and means to prevent them. Periodic health check-up of construction workers should be carried out.Metrics
References
Kulkarni GK. Construction Industry: More needs to be done. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2007;11:1-2.
Lwanga SK. Sample size determination in health studies: a manual. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1991:5-26.
Park K. Socioeconomic status scale. Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 22ndEd. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot; 2013:640-1.
Kuppuswami B: Manual of socioeconomic status scale (urban), Manasayan, 32, Netaji Subhash Marg, Delhi,(1981).
Bodhare T, Valsangkar S, Bele S. An epidemiological study of work related musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers in Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Comm Med. 2011;36(4):304-7.
Shah KR, Tiwari RR. Occupational skin problems in construction workers. Indian J Dermatol. 2010:55(4):348-51.
Patel HC, Moitra M, Momin MH, Kantharia SL. Working Conditions of Male Construction Worker and Its Impact on Their Life: A Cross Sectional. Study in Surat City. National J Comm Med. 2012;3(4):652-56.
Indian Census. Available at:URL:http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/religion.aspx.
State of Literacy, Provisional Population Totals-India. Available at:URL:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-provresults/data_files/india/Final_PPT_2011_chapter6.pdf.
Kumar B, Singh BP, and Singh R. Rural outmigration from Bihar: a case study. Indian Journal of Labour Economics. 1998;41(4):729-36.
Laad PS, Adsul BB, Chaturvedi RM, Shaikh M. Prevalence of substance abuse among construction workers. Indian journal of research. 2013;2(3):280-83.
Adsul BB, Laad PS, Howal PV, Chaturvedi RM. Health problems among migrant construction workers: a unique public-private partnership project Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011;15(1):29-32.
Trivedi A, Patel Y, Pandit N,Bhavsar B. Prevalence of skin morbidity among construction site workers working at vadodara. Healthline J IAPSM. Gujarat Chapter. 2011;2(1):31-4.