Prevalence, progression and associations of corrected refractive errors: a cross-sectional study among students of a Medical College of Odisha, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163383Keywords:
Myopia, Refractive errors, Spectacle useAbstract
Background: WHO estimates that Refractive errors are a major cause of blindness in the world leading to 42% cases of visual impairment. Refractive errors are a significant issue among young adults; this study was conducted to find out the prevalence, progression and associations of refractive errors in medical students.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among all the students of MKCG Medical College, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
Results: Out of the 506 subjects analysed, 47.4% used spectacles and 2.2% used contact lens. 48.8% of spectacle users and 81.8% of contact lens users were females and the rest males. The mean age of the sample was 22.52 years (SD=1.90). The mean age at which refractive error was diagnosed is 16.47 (SD=3.42) and the duration of corrected refractive errors was 5.90 years (SD=3.90). The most common refractive error prevalent was Myopia (54.5%) followed by combined myopia and astigmatism (31.3%), hypermetropia (8.6%) and astigmatism (5.6%). The corrected refractive error ranged from 0.25 to -12.5 D for Myopics and 0.25 to -2.5 D for Hypermetropia with a median correction of -1.75 D spherical, 0.00 D cylindrical in the right eye and the left eye alike. 73.3% of the subjects reported an increase in refractive errors since diagnosis. There was a significant increase in refractive error in myopia as compared to hypermetropia (χ2=5.20, p=0.023) and no difference between males and females (p=0.91). 26.7% respondents reported selective use of spectacles and 62.5% used bright light for reading purposes. Their most preferred activity during leisure time was mobile phone use (43.8%) followed by laptop/pc use (16.3%). 90% had at least 1 ophthalmological check up in the last 12 months. Significant difference was found among those with and without refractive errors in their Height (p=0.026), time spent reading per day (p=0.001). Significant positive correlation was reported between duration of spectacle use and the increase in dioptre power (r=0.32, p<0.01 for spherical and r= 0.24, p<0.01 for cylindrical). No significant difference was found among the same regarding patterns of TV / PC/ Mobile phone use, sleep duration, age and weight of the respondents.
Conclusions: The high prevalence of spectacle use warrants further studies for establishing the pattern of change in refractive errors and behavioural habits.Metrics
References
Mariotti S. WHO: Global Data on Visual Impairments 2010. 2012.
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Prevention CD. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004 Prévalence mondiale des déficiences visuelles dues à des. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(1):63-70.
Institute NE. Fats about Refractive errors. 2015.
Woo WW, Lim KA, Yang H, Lim XY, Liew F, Lee YS, et al. Refractive errors in medical students in Singapore. Singapore Med. J. 2004;45:470-4.
Lin LL, Shih YF, Lee YC, Hung PT HP. Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students- a 5-year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:495-8.
Raju P, Ramesh SV, Arvind H, George R, Baskaran M, Paul PG, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in a rural South Indian population. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45:4268-72.
Sethi SKG. Prevalance of Refractive Errors in School Children (12-17 Years) of Ahmedabad City. Ind J Commun Med. 2000;25:10-2.
Onal S, Toker E, Akingol Z, Arslan G, Ertan S, Turan C, et al. Refractive errors of medical students in Turkey: one year follow-up of refraction and biometry. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2007;84:175-80.
Kathrotia RG, Dave AG, Dabhoiwala ST, Patel ND, Rao PV, Oommen ER. Prevalence and progression of refractive errors among medical students. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2012;56:284-7.
Seang-Mei Saw, Wei-Han Chua C-YH, Al. E. Height and Its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2002;43:1408-13.
Teasdale TWGE. Myopia and its relationship to education, intelligence and height: preliminary results form an ongoing study of Danish draftees. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;185:41-3.
Rosner MBM. Intelligence, education and myopia in males. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1508-11.
Gopalakrishnan S, Prakash MVS, Jha RK. A Study of Refractive Errors among Medical students in AIMST University, Malaysia. Indian Med. J. 2011;105:365-7.
Shimizu N, Nomura H, Ando F, Niino N, Miyake Y, Shimokata H. Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;47:6-12.
Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Srinivas M, McCarty C a, Rao GN. Refractive errors in an urban population in Southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2810-8.
Morgan R. Women more likely than men to wear prescription glasses and/or contact lenses. 2016;2015:3000-2.
Zadnik K, Satariano WA, Mutti DO, Sholtz RI AA. The effect of parental history of myopia on children’s eye size. JAMA. 1994;271:1323-7.
Johnstone DP. Synopsis of Causation of refractive error. Dundee. 2008.
Mehdizadeh M, Jalaeian HKM. Effects of Various Risk Factors on Myopia Progression. Iran J Med Sci. 2006;31:204-7.
Seang-Mei Saw, Wei-Han Chua C-YH, Al. E. Nearwork in Early-Onset Myopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2002;43:332-9.
 
			
		 
			 
			