Contrast versus non-contrast CT in urinary tract calculi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180417Keywords:
Urinary tract calculi, CT, Contrast, Non-contrastAbstract
The incidence and prevalence of urinary tract calculi has increased significantly during the past decade. Accurate fast diagnostic modalities were developed to cope with such an increased trend. To date, non-contrast CT scan remains the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluation of patients with urinary tract calculi. However, contrast CT scans are gaining more interest. In this review, both diagnostic modalities were reviewed with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Non-contrast CT scan is a rapid, accurate, less hazardous, less expensive imaging modality that has a high sensitivity in detection of urinary calculi as small as 3 mm. However, it cannot evaluate other probable causes of flank pain. Thus, contrast CT scans can be used in situations where clinical presentation is suspicious and the possibility of other differential diagnoses is considered. Contrast CT scans do not decrease the sensitivity of detecting urinary calculi, and they do have a higher sensitivity in detecting small grades of obstruction as well as evaluating other possible causes of flank pain such as neoplasms, infectious, or inflammatory aetiologies.
Metrics
References
Roudakova K, Monga M. The evolving epidemiology of stone disease. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):44-8.
Thornton SN. Scales Jr CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Urologic diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160-5.
Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney Stones: A Global Picture of Prevalence, Incidence, and Associated Risk Factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2-3):86-96.
Strope SA, Wolf JS Jr, Hollenbeck BK. Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease. Urology. 2010;75(3):543-6.
Sas DJ. An update on the changing epidemiology and metabolic risk factors in pediatric kidney stone disease. CJASN. 2011;6(8):2062-8.
Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005;293(4):455-62.
Galal OM. The nutrition transition in Egypt: obesity, undernutrition and the food consumption context. Public Health Nutrition. 2002;5(1):141-8.
Brikowski TH, Lotan Y, Pearle MS. Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States. PNAS United States America. 2008;105(28):9841-6.
Chirag Dave KF, Schwartz BF. Nephrolithiasis: Practice Essentials, Background, Anatomy. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/
article/437096-overview. Accessed on 24 Nov 2017.
Kevin Smith MELJ. Urinary Calculi Imaging: Overview, Radiography, Computed Tomography. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/
article/381993-overview#a3. Accessed on 24 Nov 2017.
Dundee P, Bouchier-Hayes D, Haxhimolla H, Dowling R, Costello A. Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan. J Endourol. 2006;20(12):1005-9.
European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis, 2017. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/?type=pocket-guidelines. Accessed on 24 Nov 2017.
Pedro RN, Das K, Buchholz N. Urolithiasis in pregnancy. Int J Surg. 2016;36:688-92.
Coursey CA, Casalino DD, Remer EM, Arellano RS, Bishoff JT, Dighe M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) acute onset flank pain--suspicion of stone disease. Ultrasound Quarterly. 2012;28(3):227-33.
Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nature Rev Urol. 2016;13(11):654-62.
Jindal G, Ramchandani P. Acute flank pain secondary to urolithiasis: radiologic evaluation and alternate diagnoses. Radiologic Clin North America. 2007;45(3):395-410.
Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH, Schaefer-Prokop C, Kramer G, Scharitzer M, et al. Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology. 2005;235(2):530-6.
Andrabi Y, Patino M, Das CJ, Eisner B, Sahani DV, Kambadakone A. Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(3):185-93.
Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1203-13.
Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology. 2000;55(6):816-9.
Vujovic A, Keoghane S. Management of renal stone disease in obese patients. Nature Clin Practice Urol. 2007;4(12):671-6.
Your Surgery, Urinary Stones. Available at: http://www.yoursurgery.com/ProcedureDetails.cfm?BR=7&Proc=60. Accessed on 05 Jan 2018.
Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Classic signs in uroradiology. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2004;24:247-80.
Dym RJ, Duncan DR, Spektor M, Cohen HW, Scheinfeld MH. Renal stones on portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT: does intravenous contrast interfere with detection? Abdominal Imaging. 2014;39(3):526-32.
McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Bida JP, Carter RE, Fleming CJ, Misra S, et al. Intravenous contrast material-induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon? Radiology. 2013;267(1):106-18.
Newhouse JH, RoyChoudhury A. Quantitating Contrast Medium–induced Nephropathy: Controlling the Controls. Radiology. 2013;267(1):4-8.
Salama JK, Saba N, Quon H, Garg MK, Lawson J, McDonald MW. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. Oral Oncology. 2011;47(7):554-9.
Cheng PM, Moin P, Dunn MD, Boswell WD, Duddalwar VA. What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 2--CT findings, reporting, and treatment. AJR. 2012;198(6):548-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
