Treatment seeking pattern among infertile couples in a rural area

Authors

  • Chethana R. Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • . Shilpa Department of Community Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163378

Keywords:

Primary infertility, Secondary infertility, Prevalence, Rural, Treatment seeking pattern

Abstract

Background: According to DLHS survey Karnataka, women who had primary and secondary infertility constitute 5.9 and 1.7 percent respectively of ever married women between 15-49 years. Main objectives of the study were to describe the socio demographic characteristics prevailing among infertile subjects of the study population and to describe the treatment seeking pattern among the infertile couples of the study population

Methods: Cross- sectional descriptive study was conducted at rural field practice area of tertiary hospital, Bangalore, India. Complete enumeration of entire Primary Health center area covering 26,190 populations. In depth interview using a pretested pre-structured questionnaire was conducted enumerating all couples with infertility in the entire Primary Health Centre area and their treatment seeking behaviour.

Results: Total population covered under the study is 26,190. Among them number of couples were 5210. Among 5210 couples, total number of eligible couples was 4120. Eligible couples are currently married couples where the women are in the reproductive age group between 15-49 years. Among the eligible couples only 1379 were exposed the risk of pregnancy. Couples who are exposed to risk of pregnancy include those who are cohabitating and not using any approved methods of contraception, where women is not pregnant and not in lactational amenorrhoea. Prevalence of primary infertility is 4.5%.Prevalence of secondary infertility is 3.6%.So the prevalence of infertility is 8.1%.

Conclusions: Most common treatment seeking pattern was allopathy followed by traditional healers. Most common reason for not taking treatment was economic hardship among those with primary infertility and in those with secondary infertility was that they wanted to wait for spontaneous conception.

References

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506-12.

Kumar D. Prevalence of female infertility and its socio economic factors in tribal communities of central India. Rural and remote health. 2007;7(456).

Shireen J. Jejeebhoy. Infertility in India-levels, patterns and consequences: Priorities for social science research. Journal of family welfare. 1998;44(2):15-24.

Niharika T. Infertility among Indian Women: Emerging Evidence and Need for Policy Measures. Research Scholar, International Institute for Population Sciences (I.I.P.S.), Mumbai, INDIA.

Goverde AJ. Intrauterine insemination of in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic sub fertility and male sub fertility. Lancet. 2000;355(1):13-8.

Unisa S. Infertility and treatment seeking in India: findings from district level household survey. FV&V in ObGyn. 2010; Monograph:59-65.

Chhabra S, Srujana D, Annapurna MA. Health Seeking Practices of Infertile Women. Open Repro Scie J. 2012, 4:10-3.

Mulgaonkar Y. A cost effective approach in evaluation of female infertility. J Obs & Gyn. 2002;52(2):76-80.

Uday LM, Sane PV, Nath P, Sane AP. Infertility: an approach to management in a district hospitals. J Ind Med Ass. 1980;74(9):165-8.

Mallika A, Dare FO, Agarwal HS. Socio-demographic factors associated with infertility. Journal of psychosomatic research. 1999;46(2):117-23.

World Health Organization. Prevention of Infertility at the Primary Health Care level. Geneva. 1983.

Ganguly S, Unisa S. Trends of Infertility and Childlessness in India Findings from NFHS Data. F, V & V In Obgyn. 2010;2(2):131-8.

Sciarra JE. An International Health Problem. Inter J Obstet & Gynaecol. 1999(12);206-69.

Maha A. Social Consequences of Infertility upon Women in Mosul City. Iraqi J. Comm. Med Oct. 2008;21(4):291-8.

Chhabra S, Srujana D, Annapurna MA. Health Seeking Practices of Infertile Women. Open Rep Sci J. 2012;4:10-3.

Malpani A. Day care for infertility clinics. Bomb Hospl J. 2003;45(2):232-3.

Iyengar A. Impact of childlessness. Ind J Obstet & Gynaecol. 2003;14(3):19-28.

Goverde AJ. Intrauterine insemination of in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic sub fertility and male sub fertility. Lancet. 2000;355(1):13-8.

Papreen N, Sharma A, Sabin K, Begum L, Ahsan KS, Baqui HA. “Living with Infertility: Experiences among Urban Slum Populations in Bangladesh,” Reproductive Health Matters. 2000;8(15):33-44.

Unisa S. “Childlessness in Andhra Pradesh, India: Treatment- Seeking and Consequences,” Reproductive Health Matters. 1999;7(13):54-64.

Sanjit S, Pallavi G. Socio-Demographic Correlates of Women’s Infertility and Treatment Seeking Behavior in India. J Reprod Infertil. 2016;(17)2:123-32.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-24

How to Cite

R., C., & Shilpa, . (2016). Treatment seeking pattern among infertile couples in a rural area. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 3(10), 2884–2890. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20163378

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles