Informed consent in dental practice among dental professionals in Karnataka

Authors

  • Vanishree M. K. Department of Public Health Dentistry, AECS Maaruthi Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Yenepoya university, Mangalore, India
  • Ganesh Shenoy Panchmal Department of Public Health Dentistry, The Yenepoya Dental College and Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Umashankar G. K. Department of Public Health Dentistry, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20213010

Keywords:

Informed consent, Ethics, Dental professionals, Karnataka

Abstract

Background: The purpose of informed consent is to assure that the patient has a full understanding of proposed treatment and can make a relevant health-care decision based on the information provided by the health-care professional. Many health-care professionals see the process as burdensome and time-consuming. It is also one of the common allegations in many professional liabilities claims against health professionals. Informed consent focuses on patients’ absolute right to understand their status and the practitioner’s proposed treatment plan. Informed consent is the educational process by which the patient is made aware of the dentist’s diagnosis and treatment plan. Studies have shown that 40% of the written consent obtained from the parents was not valid. Making an informed decision is the right of every patient, but it is the responsibility of dentists to ensure patients have the comprehensive information needed to exercise that right.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was done to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of informed consent among 865 dental professionals practicing in Karnataka. The study used the validated structured questionnaire.

Results: The results showed 94.8% of the participants agreed that the key step to prevent one’s practice from legal action is valid informed consent.  The mean scores were used for analysis the total knowledge, attitude and practice scores for the participants were 19.01±2.61, 7.07±1.45 and 1.49±0.50 respectively. Only 37.3% of dental professionals took written informed consent and majority i.e., 54.5% took consent only for special cases.

Conclusions: Though the dentist believed in taking informed consent. Consent in practice is not taken routinely. 

 

Author Biographies

Vanishree M. K., Department of Public Health Dentistry, AECS Maaruthi Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Yenepoya university, Mangalore, India

Department of public health dentistry

Ganesh Shenoy Panchmal, Department of Public Health Dentistry, The Yenepoya Dental College and Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

prof and head,

Umashankar G. K., Department of Public Health Dentistry, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Prof and head

References

Raymond S. Edge John Randall Groves. Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice. Delmar Publishers, 1998;2.

Satyanarayana Rao KH. Informed Consent: An Ethical Obligation or Legal Compulsion? J Cutaneous Aesthetic Surg. 2008;1(1):33-5.

Jennifer K. informed consent: Does Practice Match Conviction? J Am college dentists. 2005;72(1):27-31.

Trehan SP, Sankhari D. Medical professional, patient and the law: the institute of law and ethics in medicine. Text book of National Law School of India University, Bangalore. 2002;2:57-68.

Hartshorne J, Hasegawa TK. Overservicing in dental practice-Ethical perspectives. SADJ. 2003;58:364-9.

Colleen E. O’Lear. Informed Consent. Principles and Practice. Am society anesthologist. 2010;74(2):20-45.

Story RD. Medico-legal aspects of dental treatment of the ageing and aged patient. Aus Dental J. 2015;60(1): 64-70.

Arishka D. Informed Consent and the Dentist. Online J Health Ethics. 2012;8(1):5.

Kemparaj VM, Panchmal GS, Jayakumar HL, Kadalur UG. Qualitative assessment of ethical issues in dental practice: An expert opinion. J Educ Ethics Dent. 2016;6:20-6.

Thomas. I ACC 445, AIR 1987 Ker 52. 1987. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/600254/. Accessed on 01.06.18.

Gupta VV, Bhat N, Asawa K, Tak M, Bapat S. Knowledge and Attitude Toward Informed Consent Among Private Dental Practitioners in Bathinda City, Punjab, India. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2015;6(2):73-8.

Ankita P, Abhishek G. Perception of Informed Consent among Private Dental Practitioners of Bangalore South-A Kap Study. Biomed j sci technical res. 2018;2(1):1-6.

Khare A, Saxena V, Jain M, Sharva V, Singh P, Dayma A. Knowledge and attitude toward informed consent in medical and dental practitioners, of Bhopal City, India. J Dent Res Rev. 2017;4:17-20.

Gilligan C, Attanucci J. The Moral Principle of Care two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1988;34:223-37.

Clopton NA, Sorell GT. Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning: Stable or Situational? Psychol women. 1993;17(1):85-101.

Porter SAT. Ethical dilemmas confronting dentists in Queensland, Australia. Aus Dental J. 2002;47(3):241-8.

Kress GC. A survey of ethical dilemmas and practical problems encountered by practicing dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(2):1554-62.

Anup N, Kumawat H, Biswas G, Pareek S, Tambi S. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding ethics and law amongst medical and dental professionals in Rajasthan-A Questionnaire study. J Dental Med Sci. 2014;13(5):102-9.

Kotrashetti VS. Informed consent: a survey of general dental practitioners in Belgaum city. Indian J Med Ethics. 2010;7(2):90-4.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-27

How to Cite

K., V. M., Panchmal, G. S., & K., U. G. (2021). Informed consent in dental practice among dental professionals in Karnataka. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 8(8), 3836–3842. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20213010

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles