A comparative study of central corneal thickness, mean keratometry and astigmatism in persons with and without refractive errors in Taif

Authors

  • Afnan H. Alqurashi Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA
  • Omayma K. Afifi Department of Histology, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, KSA
  • Hatim F. Jabr Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA
  • Hanan A. Aljuaid Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, KSA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20175932

Keywords:

Central corneal thickness, Mean keratometry, Astigmatism, Taif, KSA

Abstract

Background: Corneal topography is an important parameter in the evaluation of corneal disease, but there is no average value of normal corneal geometry in Saudi individuals is known. So, this study aimed to establish a standard normal value for central corneal thickness (CCT), mean keratometry (km), and astigmatism in Saudi individuals to be used as a reference value, and to compare these results with the same parameters in patients who have refractive errors.

Methods: This study was performed from January 2016 to July 2017 at King Faisal Hospital in Taif, KSA, and included a current group of 105 eyes without refractive errors, and 250 eyes with refractor errors.

Results: The mean CCT value was 551.681 µm, km value was 43.426 D, and astigmatism was 0.784 D for all eyes with normal visual acuity. However, these values are the statistically significant difference between different ages, but no significant differences according to sex. Regarding the eyes with refractive error, it was found that the mean CCT was 509.66 µm, km was 46.79 D, and for astigmatism was 3.97 D. When the results of two groups were compared, there was a significant difference between them except for km in the group a; (12-20 years).

Conclusions: The standard value of central corneal thickness, mean keratometry, and astigmatism in Saudi individuals is differing according to the age but it is the same in both genders. These values are differing statistically in patients with refractor error. 

Author Biographies

Afnan H. Alqurashi, Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA

Department of Ophthalmology

Omayma K. Afifi, Department of Histology, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, KSA

Professor of histology, College of Medicine

Hatim F. Jabr, Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA

Department of Ophthalmology

Hanan A. Aljuaid, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, KSA

Department of Medicine, College of Medicine

References

Lotmar W. Theoretical eye model with aspherics. J Opt Soc Am. 1971;61:1522-9.

Smith G, Lu CW. The spherical aberration of intraocular lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1988;8:287-94.

Nejad T, Foster C, Gongal D. Finite element modelling of cornea mechanics: a review Arq Bras Of Talmol. 2014;77(1):60-5

Li Y, Meisler M, Tang M. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:2159–66.

Ortiz S, Mena L, Rio A, Martin R. Relationships between central and peripheral corneal thickness in different degrees of myopia. J Optom. 2014;7(1):44–50.

Alageel S, Almuammar A. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2009;23:181–7.

Zhao X, Zhang L, Guan Y. Difference in normal corneal thickness and curvature between Mongolian and Han nationalities. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8(2):399–402.

Alpins A. New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism. J Cataract Refractive Surg. 1997;23(1):65–75.

Asano K, Nomura H, Iwano M, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H, Miyake Y. Relationship between Astigmatism and Aging in Middle-aged and Elderly Japanese. Japanese J Ophthalmol. 2005;49(2):127–33.

Ho J, Tsai C, Liou S. Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism Estimation by Neglecting the Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(5):788-95.

Wolffsohn J, Davies L. Advances in anterior segment imaging. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(1):32-8.

Gherghel D, Hosking L, Mantry S, Banerjee S, Naroo A, Shah S. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1272–7.

Khairat M, Mohamed H, Moftah A, Fouad N. Evaluation of corneal changes after myopic LASIK using the Pentacam. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1771–6.

Holmén J, Ekesten B, Lundgren B. Anterior chamber depth estimation by Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:576-9.

La F, Gross L, Orengo S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(1):23-7.

Sardiwalla Z, Moodley D, Ndawonde T, Madikizela A, Ngobese N, Thobela N, Oduntan A. A comparative study of central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in University of KwaZulu-Natal students of Black and Indian ethnicity. S Afr Optom. 2012;71(4):171-7.

Iyamu E, Osuobeni E. Age, gender, corneal diameter, corneal curvature and central corneal thickness in Nigerians with normal intra ocular pressure. J Optometr. 2012;5:87-97.

Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(1):175–87.

Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1271–82.

Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:37–50.

Hahn S, Azen S, Lai Y. Central corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1508–12.

Rushood A, Zahrani M, Khamis A, Rushood A. Central corneal thickness in full-term Saudi newborns. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(5):355-8.

Gelaw Y, Kollmann M, Irungu N, Ilako R. The influence of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry among selected Ethiopian communities. J Glaucoma. 2010;19:514-8.

Godar T, Kaini R, Khattri B. Factors affecting the central corneal thickness in Nepalese population. Nepal J Med Sci. 2012;1:7-10.

Eballe A, Koki G, Ellong A, Owono D, Epee E, Bella L, Mvogo C, Couam J. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Cameroonian non-glaucomatous population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:717-24.

Prasad A, Fry K, Hersh P. Relationship of Age and Refraction to Central Corneal Thickness, Cornea. 2011;30(5):553-5.

Chang S, Tsai I, Hu F. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:916–20.

Cosar C, Sener A. Orbscan corneal topography system in evaluating the anterior structures of the human eye. Cornea. 2003;22:118–23.

Pedersen L, Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Central corneal thickness in high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:539–542.

Al mahmoud T, Priest D, Munger R, Jackson B. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1235-42.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-24

How to Cite

Alqurashi, A. H., Afifi, O. K., Jabr, H. F., & Aljuaid, H. A. (2018). A comparative study of central corneal thickness, mean keratometry and astigmatism in persons with and without refractive errors in Taif. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 5(2), 416–421. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20175932

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles