DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174839

Sensitivity and specificity of waist circumference as a single screening tool for assessment of overweight and obesity

Anubrata Karmakar, Shobhit Garg, Aparajita Dasgupta, Bobby Paul, Swanya P. Maharana

Abstract


Background: Generalised and central obesity are established risk factors for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. Easy assessment of overweight or obesity is the need of the hour from public health perspective. Waist circumference (WC) can be a simple screening tool for identifying overweight individuals since measuring WC is simple, inexpensive, less time consuming, convenient for self-monitoring and needs no complicated calculation as BMI.

Methods: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted in January-February 2017 among 338 adults, in a village of Singur Block, West Bengal. Height, weight and WC were measured for each subject. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the cut-off values of WC.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of WC ≥90 centimeters for men for identifying overweight (BMI ≥25) were 78.8% and 75.6% respectively, whereas those of WC ≥80 cm for women were 80.3% and 44% respectively. ROC curve analysis revealed good diagnostic accuracy at 88.5 cm for WC cut-off for men (area under curve (AUC) 0.854, sensitivity 86.5%, specificity 67.6%) and fair accuracy (AUC 0.744, sensitivity 80.3%, specificity 44%) for WC cut-off for 80 cm for women.

Conclusions: This study shows, WC can be used for screening of overweight individual infield practice as measuring tape is inexpensive and easy-to-carry compared to a weighing scale. More research may be done on larger sample size to establish an optimal WC cut-off value for Indian population. 


Keywords


Obesity, Waist circumference, Body mass index, Sensitivity, Specificity

Full Text:

PDF

References


James PT. Obesity: The worldwide epidemic. Clin Dermatol. 2004;22:276-80.

World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical report series No.894. Geneva. World Health Organization, 2000.

WHO. Fact sheet: Obesity and overweight. 2016. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed on 3 April 2017.

Gupta R, Gupta VP, Sarna M, Bhatnagar S, Thanvi J, Sharma V, et al. Prevalence of coronary heart disease and risk factors in an urban Indian population: Jaipur Heart Watch-2. Indian Heart J. 2002;54(1):59-66.

Gupta R, Misra A. Type 2 diabetes in india: Regional Disparities. Br J Diabetes Vascular Dis. 2007;7:12-16.

Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, Dietz J. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):822–31.

Misra A, Vikram NK. Insulin resistance syndrome (metabolic syndrome) and obesity in Asian Indians: evidence and implications. Nutrition. 2004;20(5):482-91.

Raji A, Seely EW, Arky RA, Simonson DC. Body fat distribution and insulin resistance in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5366-71.

Chandalia M, Abate N, Garg A, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM. Relationship between generalized and upper body obesity to insulin resistance in Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(7):2329-35.

Han TS, Sattar N and Lean M. Assessment of obesity and its clinical implication. BMJ. 2006;333:695-8.

Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:379-84.

Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S, Birminghan L. The use of BMI and waist circumference as surrogates of body fat differs by ethnicity. Obesity. 2007;15:2817-24.

Brown P. Waist circumference in primary care. Prim Care Diab. 2009;3:259-63.

World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation of Obesity. Geneva, 1997.

Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D et al. Consensus Statement for Diagnosis of Obesity, Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome for Asian Indians and Recommendations for Physical Activity, Medical and Surgical Management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:163-70.

Molarius A, Seidell JC, Sans S, Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K. Varying sensitivity of waist action levels to identify subjects with overweight and obesity in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1113-24.

Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. British Med J. 1995;311(6998):158-61.

Kee CC, Jamaiyah H, Geeta A, Ali ZA, Safiza MN, Suzana S. Sensitivity and specificity of waist circumference as a single screening tool for identification of overweight and obesity among Malaysian adults. Med J Malaysia. 2011;66(5):462-7.

Misra A, Vikram NK, Gupta R, Pandey RM, Wasir JS, Gupta VP. Waist circumference cutoff points and action levels for Asian Indians for identification of abdominal obesity. Int J Obesity. 2006;30:106–11.

Midha T, Krishna V, Nath B, Kumari R, Rao YK, Pandey U, Kaur S. Cut-off of body mass index and waist circumference to predict hypertension in Indian adults. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2(7):272-8.

Wee CC, Phillips RS, Legedza ATR et al. Health care expenditures associated with overweight and obesity among US adults: Importance of age and race. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:159-65.

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India. National Family Health Survey-4. Available at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf. Accessed on 4 August 2017.

Pan WH, Yeh WT. How to define obesity? Evidence-based multiple action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment: an extension of Asian-Pacific recommendations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(3):370-4.

Low S, Chin MC, Ma S, Heng D, Yap MD. Rationale for redefining obesity in Asians. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38:66-74.