Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among men in a rural community of Oyo State, South-West Nigeria

Authors

  • Idowu Ajibola Department of Community Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
  • Olumide Aderonke Department of Community Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
  • Aremu Olatayo A. Department of Community Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
  • Fehintola Funmito O. Department of Community Medicine, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
  • Popoola Gbenga College of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174807

Keywords:

Intimate partner violence, Men, Rural community

Abstract

Background: Perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV) has continued unabated in many parts of the world including Nigeria with women being the victims in most instances. It is scientifically imperative to understand facilitating factors among men. This study examined the prevalence and the determinants of IPV practice among men in a rural community of Nigeria.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 430 men in Eruwa community, Oyo State, South-Western Nigeria. Two-staged cluster sampling technique was used to recruit study participants. A pre-tested, interviewer administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05 and 95% confidence intervals were obtained to assess the determinants of IPV practice.

Results: Almost three-quarter (74%) of men had perpetrated one form of IPV or the other prior to the survey. Psychological IPV had the highest prevalence of 67.2%. At the bi-variate level, practice of IPV was significantly associated with respondents’ age (p=0.001), their educational status (p=0.001), employment status (p=0.001), marital status (p=0.001), duration of relationship (p=0.001), attitudes towards IPV perpetration (p=0.001) and age of partners (p=0.001). However, only respondents’ attitude towards IPV practice (OR; 3.10, 95% CI; 1.70-5.74) and their marital status (OR; 0.43, 95%CI; 0.27-0.70) were the significant predictors of IPV practice among the respondents.

Conclusions:The burden of IPV is high among men. There is urgent need for policy formulation and implementation to curtail this public health challenge particularly among rural based men. 

 

References

World Health Organization. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: WHO; Violence by intimate partners (chapter 4); 2012: 89-112.

World Health Organization. Summary Report; WHO multi-country study on women’s and domestic violence against women. WHO; Geneva; 2005.

Antai D. Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate physical and sexual against women in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):511.

Aihie ON. Prevalence of Domestic violence in Nigeria: Implication for counseling. Edo J Counseling. 2009;2(1):1-8.

Gage A. Women’s experience of intimate partner violence in Haiti. Social Sci Med. 2005;61(2):343-64.

Fareo DO. Domestic Violence against women in Nigeria. Eur J Psychological Res. 2015;2(1):24-33.

Speizer IS. Intimate Partner Violence attitudes and experience among women and men in Uganda. J Interpersonal Violence. 2009;25(7):1224–41.

Abrahams NR. Jewkes RL, Hoffman M. Intimate partner violence: Prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence and Victims. 2006;21(2):247-63.

Fatusi AO, Alatise OI. Intimate partner violence in Ile-Ife. Gender and Behaviour. 2006;4(2):764–81.

Fawole OL, Salawu TA, Olarinmoye EOA. Intimate partner violence: prevalence and perceptions of married men in Ibadan, Nigeria. International quarterly of community health education. 2010;30(4):349–64.

Oyo State, Local Governments. Available on http://www.oyostate.gov.local-governments/. Accessed 22nd December, 2016.

Oyedeji G. Socio-economic and cultural background of hospitalized children in Ilesha. Nigerian Medical Practitioner. 1985; 2:111–7.

Owoaje ET, Olaolorun FM. Intimate partner violence among women in a migrant community in South West Nigeria. Int’l Quart of Comm Health Edu. 2006;25(4):337–49.

Obi SN, Ozumba BC. Factors associated with domestic violence in South East Nigeria. J Obst Gynaecol. 2007;27:75-8.

Ministry of Gender Equality & Family: The 2010 Domestic Violence Survey of South Korea. In Domestic Violence Survey of South Korea. Ministry of Gender Equality & Family; 2010.

Yusuf OB, Arulogun OS, Oladepo O, Olowookere F. Physical violence among intimate partners in Nigeria: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Public Health and epidemiology. 2011;3(5):240-7.

Krantz G, Nguyen DV. The role of controlling behaviour in intimate partner violence and its health effects: a population based study from rural Vietnam. BMC Publ Health. 2009;9:143.

Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Laubscher R. Intimate partner violence: prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence Vict. 2006;21:247–64.

Ackerson LK, Kawachi I, Barbeau EM, Subramanian SV. Effects of individual and proximate educational context on intimate partner violence: A population-based study of women in India. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):507-14

Brownridge DA. Understanding women’s heightened risk of violence in commo-law unions:Revisting the selection and relationship hypotheses. Violence against women. 2004;10(6):626-51.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-25

How to Cite

Ajibola, I., Aderonke, O., Olatayo A., A., Funmito O., F., & Gbenga, P. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among men in a rural community of Oyo State, South-West Nigeria. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 4(11), 3991–3997. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174807

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles