Is problem based learning a better teaching tool as compared to didactic lectures for the undergraduate students?

Authors

  • Hari Shankar Joshi Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Rashmi Katyal Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Arun Singh Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Gaurav Joshi Motilal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shalini Chandra Department of Pharmacology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Kashmir Singh Department of Surgery, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174240

Keywords:

PBL, Interactive teaching, Medical education

Abstract

Background: PBL is an educational approach in which complex problems serve as the context and the stimulus for learning. In PBL classes, students work in teams to solve one or more complex and compelling "real world" problems. They develop skills in collecting, evaluating, and synthesizing resources as they first define and then propose a solution to a multi‑faceted problem. The objectives of the study were to acknowledge the students about problem based learning; to assess the effectiveness and outcome of the teaching methodologies i.e. didactic lectures versus PBL; recommendation of incorporation of PBL or traditional teaching method as a teaching tool.

Methods: Medical undergraduate (UG) students admitted in RMCH, Bareilly, India. A total of 112 students divided into three batches (36, 33 and 33 students) participated in a systematically conducted PBL session in community Medicine department during the middle of their academic year after having experienced at least 4 months of traditional teaching in community medicine. Perception of the faculty was also taken on Likert’s scale. Responses to the items in the questionnaire was scored as follows: traditional much better (1), traditional better (2), both the same (3) PBL better (4), or PBL much better (5). Appropriate Statistical analysis using appropriate tests will be done.

Results: Information gathering and student-teacher relationship is more through traditional method of teaching as compared to PBL which is more in favour of development of interest, motivation, learning efficiency, curiosity, questioning attitude, interpersonal relationship, independent thinking and reasoning..

Conclusions: It can be very well included that introduction of PBL as the teaching modality among the students can improve the quality of medical education as per the evaluation done through the introduction of Likert’scale.

Author Biographies

Hari Shankar Joshi, Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of community medicine,

Professor and Head

Rashmi Katyal, Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department Of Community Medicine,

Associate professor

Arun Singh, Department of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Community Medicine,

Professor

Gaurav Joshi, Motilal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Medical student

Shalini Chandra, Department of Pharmacology, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Pharmacology,

Professor

Kashmir Singh, Department of Surgery, Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of surgery,

Principal and Dean

 

References

Onyon C. Problem based learning: a review of the educational and psychological theory. Clin Teach. 2012;9:22-6.

Savery, John R. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary J Problem-based Learning. 2006;1(1):9-20.

Armstrong JS. Natural Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 2012: 1-10.

Albanese MA, Mitchell, S. Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implantation issues. Acad Med. 1993; 68(1): 52–81.

Beachey WD. A comparison of problem-based learning and traditional curricula in baccalaureate respiratory therapy education. Respiratory Care. 2007;52(11):1497–506.

Mishoe, S. Problem-based learning: Any influence in respiratory care? Respiratory Care. 2007;52(11):1457–9.

Beers GW. The effect of teaching method on objective test scores: Problem-based learning versus lecture. J Nursing Educ. 2005;44(7) :305–9.

Chin C, Chia LG. Problem-based learning: using students' questions to drive knowledge construction. Sci Educ. 2004;88(5):707-27.

Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP, Wijnen WH.. Solving problems with group work in problem based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Med Educ. 2001;35:884-9.

Cuccio-Schirripa S, Steiner HE. Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. J Res Sci Teaching. 2000;37(2):210–24.

Selcuk SG, Sahin M, Acıkgoz K. The Effects of Learning Strategy Instruction on Achievement, Attitude, and Achievement Motivation in a Physics Course. Res Sci Education. 201141(1);39-62.

Schmidt HG, De Volder ML, De Grave WS, Moust JHC, Patel VL. Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. J Educ Psychol. 1989;81:610–9.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-22

How to Cite

Joshi, H. S., Katyal, R., Singh, A., Joshi, G., Chandra, S., & Singh, K. (2017). Is problem based learning a better teaching tool as compared to didactic lectures for the undergraduate students?. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 4(10), 3727–3730. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20174240

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles