Marginal integrity of direct restorations and factors influencing microleakage

Authors

  • Yasmin Mohammad Asaad Department of Restorative Dentistry, North Jeddah Specialist Dental Center, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Taghreed Mohammed Alwabel Department of Restorative Dentistry, Price Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Khalid Mohammed Talbi Al Shaty primary Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
  • Ayed Mohammed AlShehri Department of Dentistry, Ministry of Defense, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Nasser Mohammed Al Subaie College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammad Saud Altamimi Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia
  • Adel Shabib Alotaibi Alsulimaniah Primary Health Center, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Nourah Mohammed Alrumayyan Department of Dentistry, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Rayan Tarik Almarzouki Department of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Sarah Abdulrahman Algaed College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmed Abdullah Alqarni Department of Dentistry, Prince Sultan Armed Forces Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20264232

Keywords:

Marginal integrity, Microleakage, Direct dental restorations, Adhesive systems, Polymerization shrinkage

Abstract

Marginal integrity is a fundamental determinant of the clinical performance and longevity of direct dental restorations, as it influences the stability of the interface between restorative materials and dental hard tissues. Maintaining an effective marginal seal is essential for preventing microleakage, which involves the penetration of bacteria, fluids, and dissolved substances along the tooth-restoration interface. Microleakage may contribute to marginal discoloration, postoperative sensitivity, pulpal irritation, and secondary caries, potentially compromising restorative outcomes. Several factors influence marginal adaptation, including restorative material composition, polymerization shrinkage, adhesive system characteristics, cavity configuration, and clinical application techniques. Resin-based composites demonstrate favourable aesthetic and mechanical properties; however, polymerization contraction may generate interfacial stresses that promote marginal gap formation. Bulk-fill composites and glass ionomer-based materials exhibit different handling characteristics, bonding mechanisms, and dimensional behaviours, which can affect marginal performance. Adhesive effectiveness is influenced by dentin moisture conditions, surface preparation, and proper application protocols, while inadequate light curing may compromise polymerization efficiency and interfacial stability. Environmental conditions within the oral cavity, including thermal fluctuations, mechanical loading, moisture exposure, and chemical degradation, may accelerate deterioration of the adhesive interface over time. Clinical management of marginal defects requires careful assessment of restoration integrity, caries activity, and patient-related risk factors. Minor marginal irregularities do not necessarily indicate restorative failure and may be managed through monitoring, polishing, sealing, or localized repair when clinically appropriate. Preventive strategies emphasize adequate isolation, appropriate material selection, optimized bonding procedures, controlled polymerization, and regular clinical evaluation. Preservation of existing restorations through minimally invasive interventions can reduce unnecessary removal of healthy teeth and support long-term oral health. Understanding the interactions between restorative materials, clinical techniques, and environmental influences remains essential for minimizing microleakage, maintaining marginal integrity, and improving the durability and predictability of direct restorative treatments across different clinical situations and patient populations.

References

Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture: adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.

Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101.

Opdam NJM, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):943-9.

Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):962-70.

Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864-81.

Sahli A, Daeniker L, Rossier I, Caseiro L, di Bella E, Krejci I, et al. Comparison of class II bulk-fill, self-adhesive composites, alkasite, and high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in terms of marginal and internal adaptation. Materials (Basel). 2024;17(17):4373.

Santos MH, Santos LR, Alves LNS, Moura HS, Carvalho MMSG, Lins RBE. Do bulk-fill resin composites present more susceptibility to marginal degradation in different clinical scenarios? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2022;22:e210145.

Al Sheikh R. Marginal adaptation of different bulk-fill composites: a microcomputed tomography evaluation. Oman Med J. 2022;37(1):e339.

Arbildo-Vega HI, Cruzado-Oliva FH, Coronel-Zubiate FT, Luján-Valencia SA, Meza-Málaga JM, Aguirre-Ipenza R, et al. Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations versus composite restorations in dental restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(6):158.

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66(11):1636-9.

Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(1):39.

Price R, Ferracane JL, Shortall AC. Light-curing units: a review of what we need to know. J Dent Res. 2015;94(9):1179-86.

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3795-803.

Hickel R, Mesinger S, Opdam N, Loomans B, Frankenberger R, Cadenaro M, et al. Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations: recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):2573-92.

Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58-67.

Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016;41(Suppl 7):S68-78.

Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, Hickel R, Meyer-Lueckel H, Gurgan S, et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Oper Dent. 2016;41(Suppl 7):S48-57.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

How to Cite

Mohammad Asaad, Y., Mohammed Alwabel, T., Mohammed Talbi, K., Mohammed AlShehri, A., Mohammed Al Subaie, N., Saud Altamimi, M., Shabib Alotaibi, A., Mohammed Alrumayyan, N., Almarzouki, R. T., Abdulrahman Algaed, S., & Abdullah Alqarni, A. (2026). Marginal integrity of direct restorations and factors influencing microleakage. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20264232

Issue

Section

Review Articles