Evolution of grip strength across transition between teenage and adulthood: a gender-based analysis

Shubha Arora; Neha Jain

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263289

Authors

Shubha Arora Mahatma Gandhi Occupational Therapy College, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology (MGUMST), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India; Department of Occupational Therapy, Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, India
Neha Jain Mahatma Gandhi Occupational Therapy College, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology (MGUMST), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263289

Keywords:

Hand grip strength, Teenage, Adults, Hand dynamometer

Abstract

Background: Hand grip strength is an important indicator of hand and overall muscular function and is influenced by factors such as age and sex. The transition from teenage to adulthood represents an important developmental period during which changes in grip strength may occur. The objective was to examine and compare the differences in hand grip strength between teenage and adult participants and to compare grip strength between males and females.

Methods: A cross-sectional comparative research design. was conducted among 220 healthy participants aged 17–25 years, including 97 males and 123 females. Participants were divided into teenage (17–19 years) and adult (20–25 years) groups. Grip strength was assessed for both the hands using a Jamar hand dynamometer under standardized testing conditions. The mean of three trials for each hand was used for analysis, and differences between group grip strength were statistically evaluated.

Results: Males demonstrated greater mean grip strength than females in both age groups for both hands. Adult males showed significantly greater grip strength than teenage males, with mean differences of 4.46 kg for the right hand and 3.0 kg for the left hand (p<0.001). In females, the differences between teenage and adult groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Grip strength differed according to sex and age. Males demonstrating greater strength and a significant increase from teenage to adulthood. These findings highlight the importance of considering age- and sex-specific values during hand-strength assessment and rehabilitation planning.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Marzke MW, Wullstein KL, Viegas SF. Evolution of the power ("squeeze") grip and its morphological correlates in hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992;89(3):283-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330890303

Marzke MW. Tool making, hand morphology and fossil hominins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1630):20120414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0414

Dewangan KN, Patel T, Vidhu KP, Khumukcham BS, Lusang I, Sumpi N, et al. An investigation of the hand anthropometric database of agricultural workers and integration of the database into tools and protective gear designs. Work. 2023;74(4):1461-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211238

Dianat I, Nedaei M, Nezami MAM. The effects of tool handle shape on hand performance, usability and discomfort using masons’ trowels. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;45:13-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.006

Kong YK, Lowe BD. Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 2005;35:495-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.11.003

Rolian C, Lieberman DE, Zermeno JP. Hand biomechanics during simulated stone tool use. J Hum Evol. 2011;61(1):26-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.008

Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43(7):444-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.43.7.444

Kong YK, Kim DM. The relationship between hand anthropometrics, total grip strength and individual finger force for various handle shapes. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(2):187-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1029726

Mitsionis G, Pakos EE, Stafilas KS, Paschos N, Papakostas T, Beris AE. Normative data on hand grip strength in a Greek adult population. Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):713-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0551-x

Cuesta-Vargas A, Hilgenkamp T. Reference Values of Grip Strength Measured with a Jamar Dynamometer in 1526 Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Compared to Adults without Intellectual Disability. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129585

Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113637

Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69.

Bardo A, Kivell TL, Town K, Donati G, Ballieux H, Stamate C, et al. Get a Grip: Variation in Human Hand Grip Strength and Implications for Human Evolution. Symmetry. 2021;13(7):1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071142

Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Li X, Sindhu B, Kapellusch J. Hand-grip strength: normative reference values and equations for individuals 18 to 85 years of age residing in the United States. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(9):685-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.7851

Roshan PSB, Sricharan KN, Muhammad Mussamil AM. Relationship between hand grip strength, cognition, and hand dexterity in older adults: a pilot study. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2021;15(1):118-24.

Rajendiran S, Pai GM, Verma V, Rajappa S, Bhat A, Gaba S, et al. Normative Data of Grip Strength and Pinch Strength in the Indian Population. Indian J Plast Surg. 2024;57(4):256-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788999

Shetty M, Balasundaran S, Mullerpatan R. Grip and pinch strength: Reference values for children and adolescents from India. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2019;12(3):255-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-180580