Toward evidence-based laser dentistry: wavelength selection, parameter standardization and clinical outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263229Keywords:
Laser dentistry, Laser–tissue interaction, Photobiomodulation, Antimicrobial photodynamic therapyAbstract
Lasers in dentistry represent a range of wavelength-specific technologies and biological mechanisms rather than a uniform treatment category. This structured comprehensive narrative review examined the principal foundations and clinical domains of contemporary laser dentistry, including laser–tissue interaction, wavelength and parameter selection, periodontics and peri-implant therapy, endodontics, restorative dentistry, prosthodontics, oral surgery, pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, photobiomodulation, and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was reviewed and interpreted comparatively according to wavelength, target chromophore, emission characteristics, operating parameters, clinical indication, comparator, outcome measures, and degree of clinical support. The evidence showed considerable variation across applications. Selected soft-tissue surgical procedures and wavelength-matched ablative or debonding applications had the clearest clinically established roles, although superiority over conventional approaches was not universal. In periodontics, peri-implant therapy, and endodontics, lasers and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy were better supported as adjuncts to mechanical debridement or chemomechanical disinfection than as independent alternatives. Prosthodontic applications offered useful options for material-specific surface treatment and conservative restoration retrieval, although their effectiveness remained dependent on substrate characteristics and thermal control. Pediatric applications appeared relevant to minimally invasive care and patient acceptance. In orthodontics, evidence was stronger for selected soft-tissue procedures and ceramic bracket debonding than for accelerating tooth movement or consistently reducing pain. The available evidence indicates that lasers should not be considered a single therapeutic category or a universal replacement for conventional methods. Their clinical value is indication-specific and, in many applications, primarily adjunctive.
Metrics
References
Walsh LJ. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2003;48(3):146-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00025.x
Sachelarie L, Cristea R, Burlui E, Hurjui LL. Laser technology in dentistry: from clinical applications to future innovations. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(12):420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120420
Parker S, Cronshaw M, Anagnostaki E, Mylona V, Lynch E, Grootveld M. Current concepts of laser–oral tissue interaction. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8(3):61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030061
Ismail M, Michel T, Heysselaer D, Houeis S, Peremans A, Vanheusden A, et al. Absorption, thermal relaxation time, and beam penetration depth of laser wavelengths in ex vivo porcine gingival tissues. Dent J (Basel). 2025;13(9):397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090397
Gutiérrez-Corrales A, Rizcala-Orlando Y, Montero-Miralles P, Volland G, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, Torres-Lagares D, et al. Comparison of diode laser–oral tissue interaction to different wavelengths. In vitro study of porcine periodontal pockets and oral mucosa. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25(2):e224-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23317
Iaria R, Vescovi P, De Francesco P, Giovannacci I. Laser photobiomodulation: what are the ideal parameters for each type of laser used in dental practice to promote fibroblast proliferation and differentiation? A systematic review. Life (Basel). 2025;15(6):853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life15060853
Hamblin MR, Liebert A. Photobiomodulation therapy mechanisms beyond cytochrome c oxidase. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2022;40(2):75-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2021.0119
Konopka K, Goslinski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2007;86(8):694-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600803
Parker S, Cronshaw M, Anagnostaki E, Bordin-Aykroyd SR, Lynch E. Systematic review of delivery parameters used in dental photobiomodulation therapy. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(12):784-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4694
Cronshaw M, Parker S, Anagnostaki E, Mylona V, Lynch E, Grootveld M. Photobiomodulation dose parameters in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8(4):114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8040114
Parker S, Grzech-Leśniak K, Cronshaw M, Matys J, Brugnera AJ, Nammour S. Full operating parameter recording as an essential component of the reproducibility of laser-tissue interaction and treatments. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024;33(6):653-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/189795
Parker S, Cronshaw M, Grootveld M, George R, Anagnostaki E, Mylona V, et al. The influence of delivery power losses and full operating parametry on the effectiveness of diode visible–near infra-red (445–1064 nm) laser therapy in dentistry—a multi-centre investigation. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(4):2249-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03491-y
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
Ciani O, Manyara AM, Davies P, Stewart D, Weir CJ, Young AE, et al. A framework for the definition and interpretation of the use of surrogate endpoints in interventional trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;65:102283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102283
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014
Hanke A, Fimmers R, Frentzen M, Meister J. Quantitative determination of cut efficiency during soft tissue surgery using diode lasers in the wavelength range between 400 and 1500 nm. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(8):1633-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03243-4
Palaia G, D’Alessandro L, Pergolini D, Carletti R, Di Gioia CRT, Romeo U. In vivo clinical and histological thermal effect of a 445 nm diode laser on oral soft tissues during a biopsy. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(3):280-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0665
Visuri SR, Walsh JT Jr, Wigdor HA. Erbium laser ablation of dental hard tissue: effect of water cooling. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18(3):294-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<294::AID-LSM11>3.0.CO;2-6
Meire M, De Moor RJG. Principle and antimicrobial efficacy of laser-activated irrigation: a narrative review. Int Endod J. 2024;57(7):841-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14042
Cieplik F, Deng D, Crielaard W, Buchalla W, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy—what we know and what we don't. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018;44(5):571-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2018.1467876
Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and mitochondrial redox signaling in photobiomodulation. Photochem Photobiol. 2018;94(2):199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12864
Iranzo-Cortés JE, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Torres T, Bellot-Arcís C, Almerich-Silla JM. Use of DIAGNOdent and VistaProof in diagnostic of pre-cavitated caries lesions—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;9(1):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010020
Mainkar A, Kim SG. Diagnostic accuracy of 5 dental pulp tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(5):694-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.021
Abd El-Aal NH, Hussein AM, Banerjee A, Hammama HH. Clinical and ex vivo effect of lasers on prevention of early-enamel caries: systematic review and meta-analyses. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04049-4
Salvi GE, Stähli A, Schmidt JC, Ramseier CA, Sculean A, Walter C. Adjunctive laser or antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to non-surgical mechanical instrumentation in patients with untreated periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47 Suppl 22:176-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13236
Gurpegui Abud D, Shariff JA, Linden E, Kang PY. Erbium-doped: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) versus scaling and root planing for the treatment of periodontal disease: a single-blinded split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2022;93(4):493-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0133
Clem DS, Heard R, McGuire M, Scheyer ET, Richardson C, Toback G, et al. A comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG laser to minimally invasive surgical technique in the treatment of intrabony defects: twelve-month results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. J Periodontol. 2024;95(7):621-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.23-0286
Srinivasan M, Kamnoedboon P, Papi P, Romeo U. Efficacy of non-surgical laser therapy for the management of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2025;154:105562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105562
Hashim D, Courvoisier D, Cionca N. A randomised clinical trial comparing a surgical approach for treatment of peri-implantitis to non-surgical debridement with adjunctive diode laser therapy. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(2):142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06204-9
Bao P, Liu H, Yang L, Zhang L, Yang L, Xiao N, et al. In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x
Wenzler JS, Falk W, Frankenberger R, Braun A. Impact of adjunctive laser irradiation on the bacterial load of dental root canals: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(12):1557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121557
Duarte MA, Neves JA, Caçador M, Flores-Fraile J. Clinical efficiency of lasers in endodontic treatment of primary endodontic cases: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Int Dent J. 2026;76(3):109470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109470
Sabeti M, Harouni A, Gabbay J. Comparing ultrasonically activated irrigation and laser-activated irrigation for postoperative pain reduction in endodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endod. 2026;52(1):37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.002
Doğan MU, Arıcıoğlu B, Köse TE, Çıkman AS, Öksüzer MC. Association between the irrigation-agitation techniques and periapical healing of large periapical lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(7):376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05758-4
Sahar-Helft S, Sebbane N, Farber A, Sionov RV, Dakar R, Steinberg D. Temperature changes during Er:YAG laser activation with the side-firing spiral Endo tip in root canal treatment. Photonics (Basel). 2023;10(5):488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050488
García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Albaladejo A, Bellot-Arcís C. The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190736
Nascimento VA, Bento VAA, Cruz KH, Rosa CDDR D, Pesqueira AA, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of bond strength of glass and resin-ceramics with laser phototherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):129-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.004
Maziero Volpato CA, Carvalho O, Özcan M, Fredel MC, Silva FS. Effect of laser irradiation on the adhesion of resin-based materials to zirconia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35(10):1035-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1834287
Golob Deeb J, Grzech-Leśniak K, Brody ER, Matys J, Bencharit S. Erbium laser-assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(9):e100-e124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13613
Golob Deeb J, Grzech-Leśniak K, Bencharit S. Evaluation of the effectiveness and practicality of erbium lasers for ceramic restoration removal: a retrospective clinical analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0295957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295957
Lau XE, Liu X, Chua H, Wang WJ, Dias M, Choi JJE. Heat generated during dental treatments affecting intrapulpal temperature: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(5):2277-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04951-1
Sae-Ferrández O, Pecci-Lloret MP, García-Ríos P, Pérez-Guzmán N. Efficacy of Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal: a systematic review. J Dent. 2026;164:106264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106264
Esteves-Oliveira M, Schaffrath K, Wierichs RJ. Efficacy of laser-assisted caries removal and hard tissue preparation: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2025;156:105697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105697
Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271
Lin W, Shi T, Wang Y. Effect of Er:YAG laser dentin pretreatment on composite bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2025;40(1):442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04671-w
Chen J, Cui L, Ye Z, Tang D, Bao X, Li Q. The comparison of lasers and topical desensitizing agents in the management of dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(5):264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06329-x
Basualdo Allende J, Campos-Bijit V, Morales-Gómez C, Díaz L, Gómez VC, Fernández E. Do laser and light activation improve in-office dental bleaching outcomes? An umbrella review of efficacy, tooth sensitivity, and biological safety. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70176
Michalak M, Kiryk S, Kotela A, Wiśniewska-Wrona M, Kiryk J, Zborowski J, et al. Orthodontic ceramic bracket removal using lasers: a systematic review. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(4):123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040123
Reis CLB, Reis GHM, Puls GL, Silva AT, de Oliveira DSB, Küchler EC, et al. Photobiomodulation in orthodontics: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-regression and evidence map. Odontology. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01346-y
Khalil ASG, Tamish N, Elkalza AR. Assessment of chemical, ultrasonic, diode laser, and Er:YAG laser application on debonding of ceramic brackets. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02111-7
Grajales M, Ríos-Osorio N, Jimenez-Peña O, Mendez-Sanchez J, Sanchez-Fajardo K, García-Perdomo HA. Effectiveness of photobiomodulation with low-level lasers on the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of split-mouth randomised clinical trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38(1):200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03870-7
Li T, Zhang X, Shi H, Ma Z, Lv B, Xie M. Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(2):273-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x
Xu P, Ren C, Jiang YH, Yan J, Wu M. Clinical application of Er:YAG laser and traditional dental turbine in caries removal in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(5):183-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.118
Pandiyan R, Lehl G, Kumar R, Sharma U, Jagachandiran VV. Assessing the efficacy of laser pulpotomy versus conventional pulpotomy in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2024;39(1):198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04145-5
Gao Y, Hu M, Xu J. Clinical efficacy of diode laser for pulpotomy in primary teeth: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025;84:332-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v84.43804
Cappellaro EC, Ribeiro JF, da Silva CL, Cavalheiro CP, Martins MD, Lenzi TL. Diode and Er:YAG laser therapy versus other desensitizing treatments for dentin hypersensitivity in molar-incisor hypomineralization: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2026;41:51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-04830-7
Suter VGA, Altermatt HJ, Bornstein MM. A randomized controlled clinical and histopathological trial comparing excisional biopsies of oral fibrous hyperplasias using CO2 and Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32(3):573-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2151-8
Tenore G, Mohsen A, Nuvoli A, Palaia G, Rocchetti F, Di Gioia C, et al. The impact of laser thermal effect on histological evaluation of oral soft tissue biopsy: systematic review. Dent J (Basel). 2023;11(2):28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11020028
Baghani Z, Soltaninezhad P, Assarzadeh H, Sadeghnezhad P. Diode laser-assisted oral frenectomy as a modern alternative: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70156
Maboudi A, Fekrazad R, Shiva A, Salehabadi N, Moosazadeh M, Ehsani H, et al. Gingivectomy with diode laser versus the conventional scalpel surgery and nonsurgical periodontal therapy in treatment of orthodontic treatment-induced gingival enlargement: a systematic review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023;41(9):449-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0060
da Hora Sales PH, Pessôa Barros AW, de Barros Silva PG, Vescovi P, Leão JC. Is the Er:YAG laser effective in reducing pain, edema, and trismus after removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(3):501-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.10.006
Parker S, Cronshaw M. Laser safety in dental practice in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J. 2025;238(11):879-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-025-8490-0
Malcangi G, Patano A, Trilli I, Piras F, Ciocia AM, Inchingolo AD, et al. Therapeutic and adverse effects of lasers in dentistry: a systematic review. Photonics (Basel). 2023;10(6):650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10060650
Matys J, Gedrange T, Dominiak M, Grzech-Leśniak K. Analysis of aerosol generation during Er:YAG laser-assisted caries treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024;33(10):1087-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/174536
Listl S, Frühauf N, Dannewitz B, Weis C, Tu YK, Chang HJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of non-surgical peri-implantitis treatments. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(5):470-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12402
Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e081123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
