Regional health inequalities in Karnataka: translating NFHS-5 evidence into better district health planning

Suvarna K. Naikar; H. R. Channakki

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263206

Authors

Suvarna K. Naikar Population Research Centre, JSS Institute of Economic Research, Dharwad, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9841-4863
H. R. Channakki Population Research Centre, JSS Institute of Economic Research, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263206

Keywords:

Composite health index, Karnataka, Maternal health, NFHS-5, Regional inequalities, Socio-demographic indicators

Abstract

Background: Karnataka, one of India’s most socio-economically diverse states, exhibits considerable regional inequalities in health outcomes. Northern districts consistently lag behind southern districts in socio-demographic development and maternal and reproductive health indicators. These inequalities reflect the effectiveness of local policy implementation. The study assesses district and regional-level inequalities in socio-demographic and maternal and reproductive health indicators across Karnataka and identify priority districts for targeted health planning and resource allocation.

Methods: District-level data from National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-21) were analyzed. Indicators were aggregated into four administrative divisions using weighted averages. Composite Health Index (CHI) scores were calculated for socio-demographic and maternal and reproductive health dimensions. Regional inequalities were examined using descriptive statistics, quartile deviation, and district-level rankings, and spatial mapping in QGIS.

Results: Districts with higher female education, improved sanitation, access to clean cooking fuel, and health insurance coverage achieved higher socio-demographic CHI scores and better maternal and reproductive health outcomes. Northern districts, including Kalaburagi, Yadgir, Raichur, Koppal, and Vijayapura recorded comparatively lower CHI scores, while southern districts performed better across most indicators. Significant intra-divisional variation highlighted substantial inequalities within administrative regions.

Conclusions: Persistent regional inequalities in Karnataka are driven by adverse social determinants of health and unequal access to maternal healthcare services. Region-specific interventions focusing on female education, sanitation, gender equity, and strengthened maternal health services are essential to reduce inequalities and improve maternal and reproductive health outcomes across the state.

References

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). District-level health indicators for Karnataka: Analytical report. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021. Available at: https://www.iipsindia.ac.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka. State health policy 2015. Bengaluru: Government of Karnataka; 2015. Available at: https://karunadu.karnataka.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Planning Commission. Twelfth Five-Year Plan (2012–2017): Social sector. Vol 3. New Delhi: Government of India; 2014. Available at: https://niti.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

World Bank. India: Karnataka state development report. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; 2018. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human development report: Karnataka. New Delhi: UNDP India; 2019. Available at: https://www.undp.org/india. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka. Annual report on health services in Karnataka. Bengaluru: Government of Karnataka; 2020. Available at: https://karunadu.karnataka.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Sample Registration System: Special bulletin on maternal and child mortality in India 2020. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2020. Available at: https://censusindia.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Drèze J, Sen A. An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Census of India 2011: District Census Handbook – Karnataka. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2011. Available at: https://censusindia.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Planning Commission. Report on health infrastructure and regional disparities in India. New Delhi: Government of India; 2011. Available at: https://niti.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

International Journal of Equity in Health. Regional health disparities in India: Evidence from multi-dimensional indicators. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):78.

Research Directions. Regional disparities in maternal and child health: Evidence from Karnataka. Research Directions. 2018;4(1):25-41.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India: Volume I & II / Karnataka. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021. Available at: https://rchiips.org/nfhs. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Nanjundappa DM. Regional disparities in Karnataka: A study of socio-economic and health indicators. Indian J Public Adm. 2002;48(4):623-38.

World Health Organization. World health statistics 2016: Monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Karan A, Yip W, Mahal A, Selvaraj S. Health insurance and financial protection in India: Evidence from household surveys. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0171519.

Ghosh S. Regional disparities in health care in Karnataka: Patterns and determinants. Indian J Reg Sci. 2014;46(2):45-58.

Selvaraj S, Karan A. Deepening health insecurity in India: Evidence from national sample surveys since 1980s. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(40):55-60.

Berman P, Ahuja R, Bhandari L. The impoverishing effect of healthcare payments in India: New methodology and findings. Econ Polit Wkly. 2010;45(16):65-71.

Caldwell JC. Education as a factor in mortality decline: An examination of Nigerian data. Popul Stud. 1979;33(3):395-413.

Jejeebhoy SJ. Women’s Education, Autonomy, and Reproductive Behaviour: Experience from Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.

Subramanian SV, Nandy S, Irving M, Gordon D, Lambert H, Davey Smith G. The mortality divide in India: The role of socio-economic status and women's education. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(3):450-60.

NITI Aayog. Healthy states, progressive India: Report on the performance of states and union territories. New Delhi: NITI Aayog, Government of India; 2019. Available at: https://niti.gov.in. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Marmot M, Wilkinson R, editors. Social Determinants of Health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Joe W, Mishra US, Navaneetham K. Socioeconomic inequalities in maternal health care: Evidence from India. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(5):427-36.

Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: Getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284-99.

Rani M, Bonu S, Harvey S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(2):62-71.

Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian SV. Health care and equity in India. Lancet. 2011;377(9764):505-15.

Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661-9.

Sharma S, Dev SM, Mishra R. Spatial disparities in maternal health in Karnataka: District-level evidence. J Health Manag. 2019;21(2):235-49.