Strengthening of sentinel surveillance through priority settings in public health resource allocation




Intervention, Priority, Public health, Resource allocation, Sentinel, Surveillance


Background: Sentinel Surveillance assists in designing, re-designing and formulating health policy, programs and public health interventions and hence there is need to have a relook into the need for improving its implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

Methods: Informal interview based cross sectional study was undertaken during January 2015 to December 2016 among the programmatic stakeholders including the doctors, laboratory technicians and support staff for understanding of the constraints observed during conduct of surveillance.

Results: Time constraint and delayed supply of goods (94%), non-observance of guidelines (56%), dilution of sample quality (46%), requirement of training needs assessment (32%), absence of local communication network among stakeholders (68%), need for new initiatives (68%) and need for well trained staff during sample transport (34%) are important areas for quality enhancement.

Conclusions: Framework support for surveillance requires strengthening from technical inputs of stakeholders thereby facilitating multi stage corrective actions directed towards achievement of appropriate public health actions. 

Author Biography

Raghvendra Gumashta, Department of Community Medicine, People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, India

Asssistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine


Claeson M, Alexander A. Tackling HIV in India: Evidence-based priority setting and programming. Health Aff. 2008;27(4):1091-102.

Diaz T, Cock KD, Brown T,Ghys PD, Boerma JT. New strategies for HIV surveillance in resource constrained settings: an overview. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 2):51-8.

Zewdie D, Cahn P, McClure C, Bataringaya J. The role of HIV research in building health system capacity in developing countries. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008;3:481-8.

Aljunaid SM, Srithamrongsawat S, Bae SJ, Pwu RF, Ikeda S, Xu L. Health-care data collecting, sharing, and using in Thailand, China, Mainland, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Malaysia.Value Health. 2012;S132-8.

Makundi E, Kapiriri L, Norheim OF. Combining evldence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:152.

World Health Organization. Guidelines on surveillance among populations most at risk for HIV; 2011: 3-29.

Dandona L, Kumar SGP, Kumar GA, Dandona R. Economic analysis of HIV prevention interventions in Andhra Pradesh state of India to inform resource allocation. AIDS. 2009;23:233-42.

Windsch R, Savigny D, Onadja G, Somda A, Wyss K, Sie A et al. HIV treatment and reproductive health in the health system in Burkina Faso: resource allocation and the need for integration. Reproductive Health Matters. 2011;19(38):163-75.

Unger JP, Dujardin B. Epidemiology’s contribution to health service management and planning in developing countries: a missing link. Bull WHO. 1992;70(4):487-97.




How to Cite

Gumashta, R. (2017). Strengthening of sentinel surveillance through priority settings in public health resource allocation. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 4(8), 2798–2802.



Original Research Articles