A simplified approach to mandibular tooth-borne overlay denture: a case report

Authors

  • Shri Sahany Srinivasan Department of Prosthodontics, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sai Sadan Duraisamy Department of Prosthodontics, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dhanasekar Balakrishnan Department of Prosthodontics, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262760

Keywords:

Tooth-supported overdenture, Primary copings, Bite force, Abutment teeth

Abstract

Tooth supported overdentures are considered as a viable treatment option for patients with very few retained teeth. The presence of 2 to 4 remaining natural teeth bilaterally spread, are considered ideal option for a tooth supported overdenture. Tooth supported overdentures have varied advantages such as minimally invasive, cost effective and better proprioception compared to implant supported over-dentures. This case study elaborates the clinical steps in the fabrication of a tooth supported mandibular overlay denture for a 71-year-old patient with a completely edentulous upper arch and only the premolars remaining in the lower arch. In spite of the varied modes of retention such as mechanical and magnetic, a frictional mode of retention is chosen in this case.

 

References

Layton DM, Morgano SM, Muller F, Kelly JA, Nguyen CT, Scherrer SS, et al. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms 2023: Tenth Edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(4 Suppl 1):e1-e126.

Leong JZ, Beh YH, Ho TK. Tooth-supported overdentures revisited. Cureus. 2024;16(1):12-6.

Aguirre A. Systemic factors in dental implant therapy: insights from the literature. Rev Estomatol. 2024;32(2):256-8.

Elsyad MA, Hegazy SAF, Hammouda NI, Al-Tonbary GY, Habib AA. Chewing efficiency and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle with three designs of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-over study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(6):742-8.

Sagheb K, Wentaschek S, Bjelopavlovic M, Berres M, Díaz L, Fan S, et al. Evaluation of masticatory efficiency and OHRQoL in implant-retained overdenture with different numbers of implant in the edentulous mandible: a one-year follow-up prospective study. Int J Implant Dent. 2024;10:12.

Dey S, Dudhani SI, Chhaya D, Devi SS, Sharma MS, Shetty RR, et al. Assessment of bite pressure differences between implant-supported prostheses and natural dentition. Bioinformation. 2025;21(8):2581-5.

Ettinger RL, Marchini L, Childs CA. Are Root-Supported Overdentures Still an Alternative to Implant-Supported Overdentures? A Scoping Review. Gerodontology. 2022;39(3):319-29.

Subahi RH, Al Sultan NA, Hafiz RA, Alasmari AH, Almahdi SH, Al Harbi AO, et al. An overview of implant overdenture attachment systems. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023;10(12):5014–20.

Pradeep Raja BT, Manoharan PS, Rajkumar E. Tooth-supported attachment-retained overdenture: forgotten concept revisited—a case report. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2021;12(3):177-80.

DeVan MM. Biological demands of complete dentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1952;45(5):524-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Srinivasan, S. S., Duraisamy, S. S., & Balakrishnan, D. (2026). A simplified approach to mandibular tooth-borne overlay denture: a case report. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(8), 4658–4661. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262760

Issue

Section

Case Reports