Healthcare providers’ perceptions of the impact of electronic medical records on diabetes care at Nakuru county referral and teaching hospital, Nakuru county: an ordinal regression analysis of cadre and experience in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20263584Keywords:
Diabetes care, Electronic medical records, Healthcare providers, Ordinal regressionAbstract
Background: Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are central to improving diabetes care, yet provider perceptions remain critical to their effective adoption, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study assessed healthcare providers’ perceptions of the impact of EMRs on diabetes care and examined the influence of professional cadre and experience in Kenya.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 119 healthcare providers. Perceptions of EMR impact were measured using a Likert scale. Chi-square tests identified associations between socio-demographic variables and perception outcomes. Variables meeting inclusion criteria were entered into an ordinal logistic regression model to determine independent predictors. Model fit was assessed using likelihood ratio tests and Nagelkerke pseudo-R². Results: Overall, 86.5% of respondents reported positive perceptions of EMR impact on diabetes care (73.9% agree; 12.6% strongly agree). Chi-square analysis showed significant associations between perception and cadre (χ²=33.517, p<0.001), while gender, age and education were not significant. The ordinal regression model was statistically significant (χ²(5)=29.246, p<0.001) and explained 27% of variance. Nurses (OR=27.03, 95% CI: 6.27–116.51, p<0.001) and doctors (OR=19.61, 95% CI: 3.37–114.12, p=0.001) were significantly more likely to report positive perceptions compared to clinical officers. Although not statistically significant, shorter employment duration showed a consistent trend toward more favourable perceptions.
Conclusions: Healthcare providers in Kenya demonstrate overwhelmingly positive perceptions of EMRs in diabetes care, with cadre emerging as a key determinant. Tailored training and cadre-specific system optimization are recommended to enhance adoption and bridge experience-related gaps, supporting scalable EMR implementation in similar settings.
References
Karachaliou F, Simatos G, Simatou A. The challenges in the development of diabetes prevention and care models in low-income settings. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:518.
Beran D. The impact of health systems on diabetes care in low and lower middle income countries. Current Diabet. 2015;15(4):20.
Kutz TL. Improving comprehensive care for patients with diabetes. BMJ Open Quality. 2018;7(4):67.
Boonstra AJ, Vos L. The effect of electronic health records on the medical professional identity of physicians: a systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Sci. 2022;196:272-9.
Alanazi MAA. Optimizing healthcare delivery: The role of electronic medical records (EMRS) in streamlining processes. Acta Biomed. 2022;93:1-15.
Albagmi S. The effectiveness of EMR implementation regarding reducing documentation errors and waiting time for patients in outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Research. 2021;10:514.
Alderwick H. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Publ Health. 2021;21(1):753.
Rahimi AK. Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2022;162:104758.
Muinga, N. Implementing an open source electronic health record system in Kenyan health care facilities: case study. JMIR Med Informa. 2018;6(2):8403.
Ogunwole O. Modernizing legacy systems: A scalable approach to next-generation data architectures and seamless integration. Int J Multidiscipl Res Growth Eval. 2023;4(1):901-9.
Davis FD, Bagozzi PR. Technology acceptance model. J Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982-1003.
Kariuki N, Richard L. Factors influencing the adoption and implementation of the EMR among health care providers at Homabay county teaching and referral hospital. East Afr J Health Sci. 2024;7:40-8.
Kessy EC, Kibusi SM, Ntwenya JE. Electronic medical record systems data use in decision-making and associated factors among health managers at public primary health facilities, Dodoma region: a cross-sectional analytical study. Front Dig Health. 2024;5:1259268.
Cochran WG. Double sampling. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1977:327-58.
HSM CK. Uptake of electronic medical record system by health workers in selected public hospitals in Kiambu county, Kenya.
Lee Y. Usage pattern differences and similarities of mobile electronic medical records among health care providers. JMIR Health Health. 2017;5(12):8855.
Acheampong E, Oppong DK, Agyei GK. Electronic health record system and service delivery: Using cross-sectional survey to assess the perspective of healthcare professionals in a semi-rural district in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Digital Health, 2025;11:13400.
Rajab EA, Mahran SM. Nurses Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Effectiveness at Ministry of Health Hospitals in Jeddah City: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurs Reports. 2025;15(9):329.
Torkman R, Ghapanchi R. Exploring healthcare professionals’ perspectives on electronic medical records: A qualitative study. Information. 2025;16(3):236.
Mensah NK. Health professionals’ perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana. BMC Medical Inform Dec Making. 2024;24(1):254.
Mensah RO. The effect of big data analytics on clinical and management decisions in healthcare facilities in Ghana, West Africa. African J Social. 2024;4:76.
Chen RF, Hsiao JL. Health professionals perspectives on electronic medical record infusion and individual performance: model development and questionnaire survey study. JMIR Medical Inform. 2021;9(11):32180.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kingi Samuel, Khisa Wanjala Allan, Alfred Owino Odongo, Linet Angwa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.