Predictors and incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in infant pyloromyotomy: a meta-analysis

Authors

  • Osman Suliman Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences and Technology (UMS), Khartoum, Sudan
  • Raghad Farghal Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Yara Sabbagh Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Dalia Almutairi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Fatimah Alsharif Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Sara Altom Department of Basic Sciences, Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Rana Abdelmagid Faculty of Medicine, Capital University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Riham Abdelmagid Faculty of Medicine, Capital University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ahmed Abdelmagid Emergency Department, St. George’s Hospital Foundation Trust. London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262294

Keywords:

Infantile pyloromyotomy, Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, Meta-analysis, Intraoperative complications, Postoperative complications, Risk factors

Abstract

Infantile pyloromyotomy remains the definitive surgical treatment for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS). While generally considered safe and effective, both intraoperative and postoperative complications can arise, impacting patient recovery and overall outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the incidence systematically and identify predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with infantile pyloromyotomy. A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (Jaunary2016 to March 2026) to identify studies reporting intraoperative and postoperative complications after infantile pyloromyotomy. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and observational analyses. Two independent reviewers extracted data on complication types, incidence rates, and potential risk factors. Pooled incidence rates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis models, and subgroup analyses investigated the influence of surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), patient characteristics (e.g., prematurity, low birth weight), and surgeon experience. Across included studies, the overall pooled incidence of complications ranged from X-Y%. The most frequently reported complications included mucosal perforation, incomplete pyloromyotomy, wound infection, and persistent postoperative vomiting. Significant predictors of increased complication risk identified were prematurity, low birth weight, presence of coexisting comorbidities, and lower surgeon experience. Both open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy methods had similar overall safety profiles, but there were some small differences in the types of complications that occurred with each method. Infantile pyloromyotomy is still a safe procedure with low rates of serious complications. Identification and awareness of both patient and procedure related risk factors are crucial for optimizing surgical planning, enhancing patient outcomes, and facilitating comprehensive parental counseling. Future high quality, multicenter prospective studies are warranted to further refine risk stratification models and optimize perioperative management protocols.

References

El-Mefleh N. Recurrent hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: neonatal age and pyloric canal length as risk factors. Pediatr Neonatol. 2025;66(1):2-6.

Amani N. Al-Ansari, Sagar Ahammed, Ahmed A. Sofy, Somaya Shokry Tawfik. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pyloromyotomy Insights from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Rep. 2025;17(6):124.

Wilhelm S, Studzinski D, Alslaim H, Major M, Stadsvold B, Kehoe K, et al. Optimizing throughput of babies with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Am J Surg. 2024;230:68-72.

Akl MM, Ahmed AA, Abdelazim MS. Laparoscopic vs Open Pyloromyotomy for Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis. EKB J Med. 2025;6:51-55.

Parikh RM, Ata A, Edwards MJ. A contemporary review of surgical approach and outcomes in pediatric hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Surg Res. 2023;285:142-9.

Khalid K, Hamid S, Khakwani MM, Salim A, Hussain S. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Perspective from a tertiary referral center. J Pedas Adolesc Surg. 2024;3:7-11.

Guerrero MFI, Echeverría AEN. Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Treatment and Outcomes. Int J Med Sci Clin Res Stud. 2024;3(10):2343-46.

Hulka F, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ, Campbell JR. Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Am J Surg. 1997;173(5):450-52.

Sola JE.2009 Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spr Nat. 2009.

Al-Ansari AN, Ahammed S, Sofy AA, Tawfik SS. Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Pyloromyotomy Complication Rates. Pediatr Rep. 2025;17(6):124.

Analysis of Surgical Timing on Outcomes in Infantile Pyloric Stenosis. Am J Surg. 2024;230:68-72.

Mushkbar N, Fadzlien Z, Junaid A. Outcome of laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: retrospective comparative study. J Dow Univ Health Sci. 2025;19(2):75-9.

El-Mefleh N. Recurrent IHPS risk factor analysis: neonatal age and pyloric length. Pediatr Neonatol. 2025;66:2-6.

Wu P, Chu L, Yang Y, Yu Z, Tian Y. Single-incision vs conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38(1):118.

Potesta MA, Pyloric VA. Stenosis in a Patient with CEDNIK Syndrome. Cureus 2024;16(5):59475.

Binet A. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a survey of 407 children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34:421-6.

Hall NJ. Risk of incomplete pyloromyotomy and mucosal perforation in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Ped Surg. 2014;49(7):1083-6.

Sullivan KJ. Feeding Post-Pyloromyotomy: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1):20152550.

Waldron LS. Management and Outcome of Mucosal Injury During Pyloromyotomy0An Analytical Survey Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surgical Tech. 2015;25(12).

Turial S. Comparison of a Novel Technique of the Microlaparoscopic Pyloromyotomy to Circumbilical and Weber–Ramstedt Approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1136-42.

Bakari RA. Factors determining the surgical outcomes in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. Pediatr Surg Int. 2026;42:155.

Kamata M. Perioperative care of infants with pyloric stenosis. Wiley. 2015.

Joseph M. The Impact of Sociodemographic and Hospital Factors on Length of Stay Before and After Pyloromyotomy. J Surgic Res. 2019;239:1-7.

Moturu KA. Prophylactic Antibiotic use and Outcomes in Infants Undergoing Pyloromyotomy A Multicenter Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis. Ann Surg. 2019.

Laslett TV. Presentation and outcomes in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: An 11-year review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55:1183-7.

Kethman WC. Trends and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3380-5.

Woodward JM, LaRock M. Trends and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge After Pediatric Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy. J Surg Res. 2025;313:96-103.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Suliman, O., Farghal, R., Sabbagh, Y., Almutairi, D., Alsharif, F., Altom, S., Abdelmagid, R., Abdelmagid, R., & Abdelmagid, A. (2026). Predictors and incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in infant pyloromyotomy: a meta-analysis. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(7), 3878–3885. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262294

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis