Trends and determinants of cesarean deliveries in Tamil Nadu: a comparative analysis of NFHS-4 and NFHS-5

Thangasamy Pauldurai; Sathya Jeganathan; Arul Murugan; Shanmugam Ganesan Varatharajan

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262705

Authors

Thangasamy Pauldurai The Regional Health Teachers Training Institute, The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare Trust, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
Sathya Jeganathan Health and Family Welfare Training Center, The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare Trust, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
Arul Murugan Health and Family Welfare Training Center, The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare Trust, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
Shanmugam Ganesan Varatharajan Block Public Health Unit, Nilamel, Kollam District, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262705

Keywords:

Caesarean delivery, Tamil Nadu, NFHS, Logistic regression

Abstract

Background: Global evidence shows rising cesarean deliveries, with India also experiencing a notable rise. Tamil Nadu’s cesarean rates rose from NFHS-4 to NFHS-5, despite strong maternal services; this study analyses trends and determinants using NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 data.

Methods: Cesarean rates between NFHS 4 and NFHS 5 were compared for Tamil Nadu and its districts. District wise trends and AARI changes were analysed, and survey weighted logistic regression using NFHS-5 data was applied to identify factors influencing cesarean delivery.

Results: The study examined cesarean trends in Tamil Nadu using NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 data. Cesarean rates increased faster in Tamil Nadu (4.7%) than at the national level (3.8%). District-level analysis showed rates above 20% in three districts, 10-20% in eleven districts, 5-10% in twelve districts, and below 5% in six districts, with slight decrease rates observed in a few districts. Cesarean deliveries increased by 9.6% in government hospitals and by 12.7% in private facilities. The likelihood of cesarean delivery was nearly three times higher in private facilities (OR=2.79). First births occurring later in life also increased the likelihood of cesarean delivery (30+: OR=3.02); additionally, certain health conditions, such as thyroid disorders (OR=1.45) and diabetes (OR=3.16), also increased this likelihood.

Conclusions: Cesarean deliveries are continuously increasing in Tamil Nadu, with notable district-level variations. The state’s cesarean rate exceeds the national average, highlighting the need for state-specific strategies. Regression analysis identifies place of delivery, maternal age at first birth, and maternal health conditions as key factors, emphasizing the need to monitor trends and strengthen local policy interventions.

References

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in cesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of cesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671.

World Health Organization. WHO statement on cesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of cesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-57.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021.

Varghese B, Krishnamurthy J, Correia B, Panigrahi R, Bhatia M, Battaglioli T. Increasing trends in cesarean section rates in Tamil Nadu: evidence from National Family Health Surveys. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:538.

Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- evidence from NFHS-4, India. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0208113.

Subramaniam S, Selvaraj K, Ramesh S. Determinants of cesarean section in public health facilities of Tamil Nadu. Indian J Public Health. 2019;63(2):128-33.

Mohan VN, Rajendran R, Sharma S, Kumar A, Singh R, Thomas T. Variations in the prevalence of cesarean section deliveries in India between 2016 and 2021- an analysis of Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23.

Dutta R, Sharma P, Iyer A, Menon S, Gupta N, Rao S, et al. State-wise variation and inequalities in cesarean delivery rates in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021) data. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024;32.

Bhatia M, Dwivedi LK, Banerjee A. Proliferation of private healthcare facilities and rising cesarean section rates in India. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(6):837-46.

Mishra US, Ramanathan M. Delivery-related complications and determinants of cesarean section in India. J Public Health. 2002;24(4):270-7.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190. 2018.

Negro R, Mestman JH. Thyroid disease in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40(4):815-30.

Kwon HL, Belanger K, Bracken MB. Asthma and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Ann Allerg Asthma Immunol. 2003;90(2):99-110.

Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Cífková R, De Bonis M, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(34):3165-241.

Magee LA, Brown MA, Hall DR. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):1775-92.