Financial burden of intranatal care services: a study in Hassan district, Karnataka

Dhasharatha K. T.; Mahesha M.

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262277

Authors

Dhasharatha K. T. Department of Economics and Cooperation, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
Mahesha M. Department of Economics and Cooperation, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262277

Keywords:

Catastrophic health expenditure, Cesarean delivery, Financial burden, Normal delivery, Private healthcare centres, Public healthcare centres

Abstract

Background: In India, the financial burden of institutional delivery remains a major barrier to equitable maternal healthcare access. Significant cost disparities between public and private healthcare centres create substantial barriers, particularly for economically vulnerable households. Out-of-pocket expenditure on delivery care is a key driver of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among Indian households.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted including 415 mother who experienced institutional delivery. Cost data were classified into total direct and total indirect delivery costs. Statistical analysis used Welch’s t-test for comparing group means and Cohen’s d for effect size assessment. CHE was defined as total delivery cost exceeding 10% of household’s annual income.

Results: The average direct cost of normal deliveries in private healthcare centres (₹34,270) was 48.5-fold higher compared to public healthcare centres (₹706). For caesarean deliveries, the average direct expense in private healthcare centres (₹69,981) was around 42 times greater than in public healthcare centres (₹1,647). However, total indirect expenses showed no statistically significant variation across centres and delivery types (normal delivery, p=0.189; caesarean delivery, p=0.081). CHE occurred in 56% of private healthcare centres users compared to 8% of public healthcare centres users. For cesarean deliveries, CHE occurred in 64.4% of private healthcare centres cases versus 11.8% in public healthcare centres.

Conclusions: This study identified higher CHE in private healthcare centres; therefore, the government should regulate delivery costs in private healthcare centres and enhance quality facilities in public healthcare centres, and creating public awareness to promote their utilization.

References

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215. Accessed on 9 January 2026.

Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Vital Statistics of India Based on the Civil Registration System 2020. Statement 6. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2022:32.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. Fertility preferences Table 7.8. In: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-1), 1992-93: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 1995:79.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. Nutrition and the prevalence of anaemia Table 7.8. In: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2000:180.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. Maternal health Table 8.13. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India. Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007:207.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. Maternal health Table 8.13. In: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017:157.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. Maternal health Table 8.13. In: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2022:183.

Issac A, Chatterjee S, Srivastava A, Bhattacharyya S. Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis. Reprod Health. 2016;13:99.

Modugu HR, Kumar M, Kumar A, Millett C. State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1048.

Sidney K, Salazar M, Marrone G, Diwan V, DeCosta A, Lindholm L. Out-of-pocket expenditures for childbirth in the context of the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) cash transfer program to promote facility births: Who pays and how much? Studies from Madhya Pradesh, India. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:71.

Manna S, Singh D, Ghosal S, Rehman T, Kanungo S, Pati S. Out-of-pocket expenditure and its correlates for institutional deliveries in private and public healthcare sectors in India: Findings from NFHS 5. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1474.

Mohanty SK, Panda BK, Khan PK, Behera P. Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of cesarean births in public and private health centres in India. Soc Sci Med. 2019;224:45-57.

World Health Organization; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Tracking universal health coverage: 2017 global monitoring report. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

National Health Systems Resource Centre. National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2019-20). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2023. Available from: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/National%20Health%20Accounts-2019-20.pdf. Accessed on 20 February 2023.

Singh SP, Khokhar A. Out-of-pocket expenditure on healthcare amongst households of an urban village in Delhi. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023;10(10):3688-97.

Tripathy JP, Shewade HD, Mishra S, Kumar AMV, Harries AD. Cost of hospitalization for childbirth in India: how equitable it is in the post-NRHM era? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):409.

Singh RR, Sharma A, Mohanty SK. Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:966.

Nahar S, Costello A. The hidden cost of 'free' maternity care in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 1998;13(4):417-22.

Khan A, Zaman S. Costs of vaginal delivery and Cesarean section at a tertiary level public hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:2.

Sabnom R, Islam MZ. Cost and outcome of cesarean section in a public and private hospital in Dhaka city. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2013;12(3):276-81.

Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Gupta I, Chowdhury S, Trivedi M. Coverage and financial risk protection for institutional delivery: how universal is provision of maternal health care in India? PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137315.