Efficacy, tolerability and compliance of nicotine patches among Qatari population: a retrospective study

Authors

  • Bassem A. Hariri Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
  • Vajeeha Haider Department of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Manish Barman Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
  • Amena Begum Department of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Aram Salehi Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
  • Abdalrahman Mustafa Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Silva Kouyoumjian Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Mark D. Santos Department of Nursing, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Mohammed S. Ahmed Department of Ambulatory Care Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Ahmed M. Almulla Tobacco Control Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • Muad A. Hassan Department of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262221

Keywords:

NRT, Transdermal nicotine patch, Efficacy, Adverse effects of patch, Cigarette smoking, Qatar

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is a primary global health concern with significant adverse effects on public health and life expectancy. This study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and compliance of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) among smokers in the Qatar population.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 400 individuals enrolled in a smoking cessation program in an outpatient department. The participants were randomized into a NRT group (300 participants) and a control group (100 participants).

Results: No significant differences were found in adverse effects between the NRT and control groups, including palpitations, chest pains, nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal complaints, and insomnia. Skin allergy or itching was rare in the NRT group. There was no statistically significant increase in anxiety or depressive symptoms associated with NRT use. Additionally, there was no significant difference in both groups' primary outcomes or efficacy.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that NRT is a safe and effective smoking cessation method for smokers in the Qatar population. The use of NRT should be considered alongside counseling and medical monitoring to improve smoking cessation rates.

References

Chang CP, Huang WH, You CH, Hwang LC, Lu IJ, Chan HL. Factors correlated with smoking cessation success in older adults: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3462.

AlMulla A, Mamtani R, Cheema S, Maisonneuve P, BaSuhai JA, Mahmoud G, et al. Epidemiology of tobacco use in Qatar: prevalence and its associated factors. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250065.

Benowitz NL, Pipe A, West R, Hays JT, Tonstad S, McRae T, et al. Cardiovascular safety of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):622-31.

Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Bullen C, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD000146.

Fanshawe TR, Halliwell W, Lindson N, Aveyard P, Livingstone-Banks J, Hartmann-Boyce J. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD003289.

Lindson N, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Fanshawe TR, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J. Different doses, durations, and modes of delivery of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CD013308.

Hitsman B, Hawk LW Jr, Cinciripini P, George TP, Benowitz NL, Lubitz SF, et al. Evaluation of nicotine patch adherence measurement using self-report and saliva cotinine among abstainers in a smoking cessation trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;210:107967.

Weinberger AH, Smith PH, Kaufman M, McKee SA. Consideration of sex in clinical trials of transdermal nicotine patch: a systematic review. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;22(5):373-83.

Tulloch HE, Pipe AL, Els C, Clyde MJ, Reid RD. Flexible, dual-form nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline in comparison with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2016;14:80.

Leung MKW, Bai D, Yip BHK, Fong MY, Lai PMH, Lai P, et al. Combined nicotine patch with gum versus nicotine patch alone in smoking cessation in Hong Kong primary care clinics: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1302.

Johnson M, Anderson P, Lockhart I. General practitioner prescribing of single and combination nicotine replacement therapy in the UK: a retrospective database study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:47.

Gillies MA, McKenzie CA, Whiteley C, Beale RJ, Tibby SM. Safety of nicotine replacement therapy in critically ill smokers: a retrospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(10):1683-8.

Emerman CL, Tracy CL, Siff J. Nicotine patch prescription fulfillment rates for emergency department patients. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(3):648-52.

Emerman Linakis MW, Rower JE, Roberts JK, Miller EI, Wilkins DG, Sherwin CMT. Population pharmacokinetic model of transdermal nicotine delivered from a matrix-type patch. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(12):2709-17.

Olsson Gisleskog PO, Perez Ruixo JJ, Westin Å, Hansson AC, Soons PA. Nicotine population pharmacokinetics in healthy smokers after intravenous, oral, buccal and transdermal administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021;60(4):541-61.

Bailey SR, Crew EE, Riske EC, Ammerman S, Robinson TN, Killen JD. Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies to aid smoking cessation in adolescents. Paediatr Drugs. 2012;14(2):91-108.

Mersha AG, Eftekhari P, Bovill M, Tollosa DN, Gould GS. Evaluating level of adherence to nicotine replacement therapy and its impact on smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):1-14.

Devi RE, Barman D, Sinha S, Hazarika SJ, Das S. Nicotine replacement therapy: a friend or foe. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(6):2615.

Roddy E, Romilly N, Challenger A, Lewis S, Britton J. Use of nicotine replacement therapy in socioeconomically deprived young smokers: a community-based pilot randomized controlled trial. Tob Control. 2006;15(5):373-6.

Moolchan ET, Robinson ML, Ernst M, Cadet JL, Pickworth WB, Heishman SJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of the nicotine patch and gum for the treatment of adolescent tobacco addiction. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):e407-14.

Suchanek Hudmon K, Corelli RL, Prokhorov AV. Current approaches to pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4(1):35-47.

Shiffman S, Sweeney CT, Ferguson SG, Sembower MA, Gitchell JG. Relationship between adherence to daily nicotine patch use and treatment efficacy. Clin Ther. 2008;30(10):1852-8.

Goldwire M, Lehano C, Ostenson A. Nicotine replacement therapy in the hospitalized patient. US Pharm. 2015;40(8):HS20-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

A. Hariri, B., Haider, V., Barman, M., Begum, A., Salehi, A., Mustafa, A., Kouyoumjian, S., Santos, M. D., Ahmed, M. S., Almulla, A. M., & Hassan, M. A. (2026). Efficacy, tolerability and compliance of nicotine patches among Qatari population: a retrospective study. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(7), 3333–3337. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20262221

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles