Cultural beliefs and partner support on postpartum bilateral tubal ligation decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20261743Keywords:
Cultural beliefs, Decision-making, Multiparous mothers partner support, Postpartum bilateral tubal ligationAbstract
Background: Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) is a permanent family planning method that requires informed and autonomous decision-making. Cultural beliefs and partner support are recognized as influential factors in reproductive health choices, yet their combined influence among multiparous mothers in local government hospital settings remains underexplored. This study examined the relationship between cultural beliefs, partner support, and decision-making regarding postpartum BTL among multiparous mothers in selected government hospitals in a province in southern Philippines.
Methods: A descriptive–correlational research design was employed involving 110 purposively selected multiparous mothers with at least three live births. Data were collected in Obstetrics and Gynecology wards using validated researcher-developed questionnaires measuring cultural beliefs, partner support, and decision-making. Instruments underwent pilot testing, expert validation, and reliability testing (Cronbach’s α≥0.70). Descriptive statistics summarized variable levels, while Pearson’s r and multiple regression analyses determined relationships and predictive influences, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results: Findings revealed high levels of cultural influence and partner support, alongside generally good decision-making. Religious and spiritual beliefs emerged as the most dominant cultural factors and were strongly associated with all decision-making dimensions. Partner support significantly correlated with knowledge, autonomy, and service access. Regression analysis identified family expectations and practical support as significant predictors, explaining 13.83% of the variance.
Conclusions: Culturally sensitive and couple-centered counseling is essential to enhance informed postpartum family planning decisions.
Metrics
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to postpartum sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e169-76.
Thurman AR, Janecek T. One-year follow-up of postpartum sterilization requests. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1071-7.
Rodriguez MI, Dissanayake M, Swartz JJ, Funkhouser S, Baldwin MK. Cost-effectiveness of immediate postpartum tubal ligation. Contraception. 2020;101(4):223-9.
WHO. Birth spacing and maternal outcomes. WHO Reproductive Health Review. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045989. Accessed on 03 February 2026.
Sedgh G, Ashford LS, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(2):151-69.
Chandra-Mouli V, McCarraher DR, Phillips SJ, Williamson NE, Hainsworth G. Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: Needs, barriers, and access. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):1.
Stevenson EL, Rojas M, Lantiere A, Meekins M, Fitch ER, Maralit JR, et al. Qualitative analysis of men’s involvement in family planning in the Philippines: An ecological assessment. Am J Men's Health. 2023;17(4):15579883231191359.
Flores AP, Mendoza RS. Religion and permanent contraception attitudes in the Philippines. Asian J Soc Sci. 2022;50(3):345-60.
Lagman MA. Institutional barriers to reproductive health services in faith-based hospitals. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(9):1435-42.
Philippine Statistics Authority. Fertility and poverty indicators. 2023. Available at: https://psa.gov.ph/. Accessed on 03 February 2026.
Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Family planning and health outcomes. Lancet. 2020;395(10235):1817-25.
Budu E, Okyere J, Osei MD, Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO. Sociocultural determinants of contraceptive uptake in Southeast Asia. Reprod Health. 2021;18:87.
Yahya AN, Bintube SAK, Ibrahim AJ, Bello MSA, Ali AMS, Usman AMA, et al. Sociocultural barriers to contraception: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(3):e008552.
Cabral EI, Perez AE. Gender power dynamics in Filipino households. J Gender Stud. 2020;29(6):655-67.
Yahya AN, Bintube SAK, Ibrahim AJ, Bello MSA, Ali AMS, Usman AMA, et al. Spousal communication and contraceptive use. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:100.
Shattuck D. Partner involvement and modern contraceptive use. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51(2):163–81.
Aventin Á, Gordon S, Laurenzi CA, Rabie S, Tomlinson M, Lohan M, et al. Involving men and boys in family planning: A systematic review of the effective components and characteristics of complex interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Campbell System Rev. 2023;19(1):e1296.
Nkonde H, Nansubuga E, Semitala FC, Birabwa C. Male partner influence on women’s choices and utilisation of family planning services in Mufulira district, Zambia. Heliyon, 2023;9(10):e20659.
Omona K, Namuli A, Nakigudde J, Kananura RM. Male involvement in postpartum family planning and associated factors among men in Kampala, Uganda: A study of Kiswa Health Centre III. J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2023;43(1):2158321..
Brandi K, Fuentes L. The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. Am J Obstetr Gynecol, 2020;222(4S):S873–7.
Borrero S, Moore CG, Qin L, Schwarz EB, Akers AY, Creinin MD, et al. Sterilization of rural and urban women in the United States. Contraception, 2013;88(1):70-6.
High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Postpartum family planning counseling brief. 2021. Available at: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/immediate-postpartum-family-planning/?. Accessed on 03 February 2026.
Goueth RC, Maki KG, Babatunde A, Eden KB, Darney BG. Effects of technology-based contraceptive decision aids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2022;227(5):705-13.e9.
Arora KS, Wilkinson B. Disparities in sterilization access and reproductive autonomy in the United States. Contraception. 2018;97(1):1–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
