Cultural beliefs and partner support on postpartum bilateral tubal ligation

Mary Cris E. Campaner-Eguia; Merasol O. Duyag

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20261743

Authors

Mary Cris E. Campaner-Eguia Graduate School, Misamis University, Ozamis Ci, Philippines
Merasol O. Duyag Graduate School, Misamis University, Ozamis Ci, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20261743

Keywords:

Cultural beliefs, Decision-making, Multiparous mothers partner support, Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation

Abstract

Background: Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) is a permanent family planning method that requires informed and autonomous decision-making. Cultural beliefs and partner support are recognized as influential factors in reproductive health choices, yet their combined influence among multiparous mothers in local government hospital settings remains underexplored. This study examined the relationship between cultural beliefs, partner support, and decision-making regarding postpartum BTL among multiparous mothers in selected government hospitals in a province in southern Philippines.

Methods: A descriptive–correlational research design was employed involving 110 purposively selected multiparous mothers with at least three live births. Data were collected in Obstetrics and Gynecology wards using validated researcher-developed questionnaires measuring cultural beliefs, partner support, and decision-making. Instruments underwent pilot testing, expert validation, and reliability testing (Cronbach’s α≥0.70). Descriptive statistics summarized variable levels, while Pearson’s r and multiple regression analyses determined relationships and predictive influences, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: Findings revealed high levels of cultural influence and partner support, alongside generally good decision-making. Religious and spiritual beliefs emerged as the most dominant cultural factors and were strongly associated with all decision-making dimensions. Partner support significantly correlated with knowledge, autonomy, and service access. Regression analysis identified family expectations and practical support as significant predictors, explaining 13.83% of the variance.

Conclusions: Culturally sensitive and couple-centered counseling is essential to enhance informed postpartum family planning decisions.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to postpartum sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e169-76.

Thurman AR, Janecek T. One-year follow-up of postpartum sterilization requests. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1071-7.

Rodriguez MI, Dissanayake M, Swartz JJ, Funkhouser S, Baldwin MK. Cost-effectiveness of immediate postpartum tubal ligation. Contraception. 2020;101(4):223-9.

WHO. Birth spacing and maternal outcomes. WHO Reproductive Health Review. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045989. Accessed on 03 February 2026.

Sedgh G, Ashford LS, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(2):151-69.

Ameyaw EK. Myths and misconceptions about contraception in LMICs. BMC Public Health 2021;21:1444.

Cruz GT. Fertility norms and reproductive decision-making in the Philippines. Philipp Popul Rev 2021;20(1):1–15.

Flores AP, Mendoza RS. Religion and permanent contraception attitudes in the Philippines. Asian J Soc Sci. 2022;50(3):345-60.

Lagman MA. Institutional barriers to reproductive health services in faith-based hospitals. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(9):1435-42.

Philippine Statistics Authority. Fertility and poverty indicators. 2023. Available at: https://psa.gov.ph/. Accessed on 03 February 2026.

Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Family planning and health outcomes. Lancet. 2020;395(10235):1817-25.

Budu E, Okyere J, Osei MD, Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO. Sociocultural determinants of contraceptive uptake in Southeast Asia. Reprod Health. 2021;18:87.

Yahya AN, Bintube SAK, Ibrahim AJ, Bello MSA, Ali AMS, Usman AMA, et al. Sociocultural barriers to contraception: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(3):e008552.

Cabral EI, Perez AE. Gender power dynamics in Filipino households. J Gender Stud. 2020;29(6):655-67.

Yahya AN, Bintube SAK, Ibrahim AJ, Bello MSA, Ali AMS, Usman AMA, et al. Spousal communication and contraceptive use. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:100.

Shattuck D. Partner involvement and modern contraceptive use. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51(2):163–81.

Tokhi M. Male involvement in maternal health: a systematic review. Reprod Health 2021;18:63.

Silverman JG. Intimate partner support and reproductive autonomy. Contraception 2022;110:15–21.

Darteh EKM. Partner support and contraceptive uptake. PLoS One 2021;16(7):e0254335.

Dehlendorf C. Shared decision-making in contraceptive counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222(4):S878–S885.

Kantorová V. Socioeconomic determinants of contraceptive use. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(3):e002126.

High Impact Practices in Family Planning. Postpartum family planning counseling brief. 2021. Available at: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/immediate-postpartum-family-planning/?. Accessed on 03 February 2026.

Garbers S. Decision aids for tubal sterilization counseling. Patient Educ Couns 2022;105(5):1234–41.

Arora KS. Denied postpartum sterilization and subsequent pregnancy risk. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(3):573–79.