Outcomes and complications after appendectomy and cholecystectomy in emergency surgical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Osman Suliman Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan
  • Ali Fadhel Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Khalid AboZena Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Ibrahim Aljohani Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammed Albensari Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Khalid Almutair Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Sara Altom Department of Basic Sciences, Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Omer Abdelbagi Department of Surgery, Main Hospital, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Medical City Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Riham Abdelmagid Faculty of Medicine, Capital University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ahmed Abdelmagid Emergency Department, St. George’s Hospital Foundation Trust. London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260745

Keywords:

Acute care surgery, Appendectomy, Cholecystectomy, Postoperative complications, Emergency General surgery

Abstract

Acute care surgery (ACS) was developed as a consultant led organizational framework designed to enhance the promptness and quality of emergency general surgical care. Appendectomy and cholecystectomy are considered standard ACS procedures; nevertheless, the reported rates of postoperative complications are varied, attributed to differences in patient demographics, illness severity, surgical care, and institutional policies. This meta-analysis, executed in alignment with PRISMA 2020 recommendations, assessed publications published from January 2010 to December 2025 that investigated postoperative outcomes following emergency appendectomy and cholecystectomy within the contexts of ACS or emergency general surgery. Eligible trials comprised adult or mixed-age groups with recorded perioperative outcomes. Independent reviewers did the data extraction and quality check. When it made sense, random-effects meta-analyses were done, and the I² statistic was used to measure heterogeneity. Evidence synthesis demonstrated that the application of ACS typically improves surgical speed, reduces hospital length of stay, and yields comparable or diminished postoperative complication rates in contrast to conventional on call systems. Infections at the surgical site, damage to the bile duct, bile leaks, and abscesses in the abdomen were all common problems. Comorbidity, illness severity, operating delay, and open surgical conversion were all factors that led to bad outcomes. On the other hand, early intervention and minimally intrusive methods were always linked to better results. In general, ACS-based care is a good and flexible way to handle emergency appendectomy and cholecystectomy. It follows the rules of quality, safety, and efficient use of resources. The ongoing diversity among studies highlights the necessity for defined care pathways and sustained high-quality research focused on ACS.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hameed SM, Brenneman FD, Ball CG, Pagliarello J, Razek T, Parry N, Widder S, et al. General surgery 2.0: the emergence of acute care surgery in Canada. Can J Surg. 2010;53(2):79-83.

Zielinski MD, Bannon MP. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2011;146(4):363-9.

Fu G, Xu Z, Zhang S. Navigating appendicitis care during the Covid-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02466-4

Choi JD, Fong MJ, A. Safe postoperative outcomes following early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis regardless of symptom onset. Turk J Surg. 2023;39(4):321-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165

Mencarini V, Amanda V, Rocco MZ, Marco M. Diagnosis and treatment of acute cholecystitis: an updated review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092695

Ball CG, Hameed SM, Brenneman FD, Tanvir CT, Henry TS, Lea A, et al. Complications of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in acute care surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(3):576-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002825

Calpin GG, Hembrecht S, Giblin K, Cian H, Gavin PD, Arnold DKH. The impact of timing on outcomes in appendectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(1):24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00549-4

Cheng X, Hao F, Wang Z. Based on bibliometric visual analysis, the current status and development trends of research on complications after cholecystectomy. Front Surg. 2025;12:1586139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1586139

Tang G, Wang J. Timing of Appendectomy Daytime vs Nighttime Appendectomy impact on outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38:1705-12.

Cironi K, Albuck AL, McLafferty B, Alison KM, Christina McC, Mohammad H, et al. Risk factors for postoperative infections following appendectomy of complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis and retrospective single-institutional study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024;34(1):20-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001234

Kurdi Y, Alqahtani R, Khunayn NB, Leena A, Suha A, Najd A. Evaluating the necessity of post-operative antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03152-9

Bhangu A, Søreide K, Salomone Di S, Jeanette HA, Frederick TD. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5

Vincenzi P, Mocchegiani F, Nicolini D, Andrea BC, Diletta G, Marco V. Bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy: an individual patient data systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164837

Wu H, Liao B, Cao T, Tengfei J, Jianbin H, Yumei L, et al. Comparison of safety profile, conversion rate and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:118548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1185482

Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):170-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6870

Lai SL, Chang CH, Lee PC, Cheng-Maw H, Jin-Ming W, Hong-Shiee L, et al. Impact of preoperative factors and waiting time on post-appendectomy complications: a retrospective study. Perioper Med. 2024;13(1):8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00365-z

Felipe BM, Jamil S, Dipan P, Snehal P, Federico JS, Edward L, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program comparative analysis. Surgery. 2025;178:108772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.006

Fanciulli G, Favara G, Maugeri A, Martina B, Antonella A, Guido B. Comparing percutaneous treatment and cholecystectomy outcomes in acute cholecystitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2025;20(1):50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00622-6

Appendicitis Non-Operative Strategy Meta-Analysis: Antibiotic treatment vs appendectomy. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;9(6):345-55.

Manueli Laos EG, Ducas A, Huh N, Alberto M, Paula L, Mario AM. Challenges in management of acute appendicitis: A narrative review. Curr Problems Surg. 2024;61(11):101596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101596

Martina L, Carlo V. Postoperative Infections After Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: The Surgeon's Checklist. 2025.

Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Marco C, Goran A, Alice G, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3

Elkasaby MH, Elsayed H, Charo DC, Mohamed AR, Omar E, Islam ME, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency cholecystectomy for mild to moderate acute cholecystitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Perioper Med. 2024;13(1):87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00441-4

Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Magnus N. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy. BMJ. 2012;345:e6457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6457

Van Maasakkers MHG, Weijs TJ, Cnossen OP, van Braak WG, Kelder JC, Roulin D, et al. Evaluating the 7-day barrier: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis with prolonged symptom duration; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409(1):366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03555-x

Madi Jaghabir M, Alajmi AHA, Al-Hawadi BS. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications. Vascular Endovascular Rev. 2025;8(13s):123-9.

Ahmed AE, Ahmed SA, Raheem OAA. Outcomes of Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Cholecystitis. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2024;95(1):1943-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2024.356003

Liu L, Feng W, Yu K. Risk factors of abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy. BMC Surg. 2025;25:482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03241-9

Downloads

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Suliman, O., Fadhel, A., AboZena, K., Aljohani, I., Albensari, M., Almutair, K., Altom, S., Abdelbagi, O., Abdelmagid, R., & Abdelmagid, A. (2026). Outcomes and complications after appendectomy and cholecystectomy in emergency surgical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(4), 2000–2007. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260745

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis