Cutaneous vascular response and its role in the efficacy of laser-based aesthetic procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260153Keywords:
Cutaneous vasculature, Laser therapy, Selective photothermolysis, Vascular lesions, Aesthetic dermatologyAbstract
Laser-based aesthetic procedures rely heavily on the interaction between laser energy and the skin’s vascular system. The effectiveness of these treatments often depends on the ability to precisely target and modulate blood vessels without damaging surrounding tissue. Key to this process is selective photothermolysis, where laser wavelengths are absorbed by hemoglobin, leading to controlled thermal injury and vessel coagulation. The biological response that follows includes inflammatory signaling, thrombosis, and subsequent vascular remodeling, all of which contribute to clinical improvements in conditions like telangiectasia, port-wine stains, and facial erythema. The extent of vascular response is shaped by numerous variables such as vessel size, blood flow rate, depth, and the optical properties of the skin. Laser parameters including wavelength, pulse duration, and fluence must be carefully matched to these vessel characteristics to ensure effective treatment. In patients with darker skin tones, melanin competes with hemoglobin for light absorption, raising the risk of pigmentation issues. Protective measures like epidermal cooling and longer wavelengths help reduce adverse effects while maintaining efficacy. Treatment outcomes are also influenced by anatomical location, pre-existing vascular conditions, and patient-specific healing responses. Technological advancements, including dynamic cooling, pulse stacking, and multispectral lasers, have improved precision and safety. Monitoring vascular behavior during treatment allows for real-time adjustments, making procedures more adaptable to individual needs. Together, a deeper understanding of vascular mechanisms and improved device control continues to expand the potential of laser-based aesthetics, offering more consistent and personalized results across a wide range of skin types and vascular presentations.
Metrics
References
Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220(4596):524-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6836297
Railan D, Parlette EC, Uebelhoer NS, Rohrer TE. Laser treatment of vascular lesions. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(1):8-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.10.026
Jeon H, Bernstein LJ, Belkin DA, Ghalili S, Geronemus RG. Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in infancy without the need for general anesthesia. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(4):435-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5249
Alster TS, Lupton JR. Lasers in dermatology: an overview of types and indications. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(5):291-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102050-00004
Khatri KA, Ross V, Grevelink JM, Magro CM, Anderson RR. Comparison of erbium: YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of facial rhytides. Arc dermatol. 1999;135(4):391-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.4.391
Jasim ZF, Handley JM. Treatment of pulsed dye laser–resistant port wine stain birthmarks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(4):677-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.01.019
Garden JM, Tan OT, Kerschmann R, et al. Effect of dye laser pulse duration on selective cutaneous vascular injury. J Investig Dermatol. 1986;87(5):653-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12456368
Husein-ElAhmed H, Steinhoff M. Laser and light-based therapies in the management of rosacea: an updated systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(6):1151-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03200-1
Lou WW, Quintana AT, Geronemus RG, Grossman MC. Effects of topical vitamin K and retinol on laser-induced purpura on nonlesional skin. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(12):942-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99145.x
Tang J, He X. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pulsed dye laser, narrow-band intense pulsed light, and broad-band intense pulsed light in the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Am J Translation Res. 2025;17(7):5530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62347/LMUT4952
Nguyen L, Seeber N, Kautz G, Hartjen A, Schneider SW, Herberger K. 532‐nm potassium titanyl‐phosphate laser versus 595‐nm pulsed dye laser for port‐wine birthmarks: A prospective, randomized, split‐side study. J Eu Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(6):1140-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.19750
Faurschou A, Togsverd‐Bo K, Zachariae C, Hædersdal M. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port‐wine stains: a randomized side‐by‐side trial with blinded response evaluation. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(2):359-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08993.x
Kołodziejczak A, Rotsztejn H. Efficacy of fractional laser, radiofrequency and IPL rejuvenation of periorbital region. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(2):895-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03329-7
Hui Q, Chang P, Guo B, Zhang Y, Tao K. The clinical efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma combined with ultra-pulsed fractional CO2 laser therapy for facial rejuvenation. Rejuvenation Res. 2017;20(1):25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2016.1823
West TB, Alster TS. Comparison of the long-pulse dye (590–595 nm) and KTP (532 nm) lasers in the treatment of facial and leg telangiectasias. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(2):221-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04140.x
Kilmer SL, Garden JM. Laser treatment of pigmented lesions and tattoos. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2000;19(4):232-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/sder.2000.18363
Greve B, Raulin C. Prospective study of port wine stain treatment with dye laser: comparison of two wavelengths (585 nm vs. 595 nm) and two pulse durations (0.5 milliseconds vs. 20 milliseconds). Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(2):168-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20003
Chapas AM, Eickhorst K, Geronemus RG. Efficacy of early treatment of facial port wine stains in newborns: a review of 49 cases. Official J Am Society Laser Med Surg. 2007;39(7):563-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20529