Enhancing COVID-19 analysis using adaptive robust geographically weighted regression: a global perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20261410Keywords:
AR-GWR, Bandwidth selection, COVID-19, γ-divergence, GWR, OLS, Predictive modelling, Spatial regressionAbstract
Background: Understanding the global spread and impact of COVID-19 requires analytical approaches that capture spatial heterogeneity and data irregularities. Traditional regression methods often fail to address issues such as outliers and heteroscedasticity, limiting their effectiveness in modeling pandemic data.
Methods: This was an ecological and spatial analytical study using secondary global COVID-19 data. This study employs an adaptive robust geographically weighted regression (AR-GWR) model integrated with the γ-divergence technique to enhance robustness against outliers and non-constant variance. Unlike classical regression and standard geographically weighted regression (GWR), the AR-GWR model incorporates adaptive bandwidth selection, enabling automatic optimization of spatial smoothness and robustness parameters. This improves localized parameter estimation and predictive performance.
Results: The findings reveal substantial spatial variation in COVID-19 outcomes across countries. Nations with advanced healthcare systems, such as South Korea and France, report higher case numbers despite high human development index (HDI) scores. In contrast, Sub-Saharan African countries exhibit relatively lower case and mortality rates, potentially due to demographic and geographic factors. The AR-GWR model identifies healthcare infrastructure and preexisting health conditions as significant determinants of COVID-19 mortality, while demographic factors primarily influence infection rates. Compared to traditional models, AR-GWR demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and better handling of spatial non-stationarity.
Conclusions: The study highlighted the effectiveness of advanced spatial regression techniques, particularly AR-GWR with adaptive bandwidth selection, in modelling complex pandemic data. By accounting for spatial heterogeneity and data irregularities, the model provides more reliable insights into global health patterns. These findings can support improved pandemic preparedness and informed public health decision-making.
Metrics
References
Chaurasia R, Singh S, Singh V. Progression of COVID-19 in India: a linear regression analysis. medRxiv. 2021.
Kumar A, Awasthi A. Piecewise linear regression for predicting COVID-19 cases in India. SpringerLink. 2020.
Kang D, Choi H, Kim JH, Choi J. Spatial epidemic dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:96-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.076
Mollalo A, Vahedi B, Rivera KM. GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884
Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley; 2002.
LeSage JP. A family of geographically weighted regression models. In: Anselin L, Florax RJM, Rey SJ, eds. Advances in spatial econometrics. 1st edn. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2004:241-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2_11
Zhang J, Mei CL. Local least absolute deviation estimation of spatially varying coefficients models: Robust geographically weighted regression approaches. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2011;25(9):1417-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.528420
Salvati N, Pratesi M, Giusti C. The use of M-quantile models as an alternative to random effect models in small area estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 2012;175(1):267-86.
Chen Y, Okada N, Zhou Y. Geographically weighted regression based on the asymmetric loss function. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2012;26(6):799-810.
Sugasawa S, Murakami D. Adaptively robust geographically weighted regression. J Spat Sci. 2021;66(2):285-98.
Hunter DR, Lange K. A tutorial on MM algorithms. Am Stat. 2004;58(1):30-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130042836
Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1328