Assessment of the San Francisco syncope rule in detecting high-risk cardiac and neurological causes of syncope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260060Keywords:
Syncope, Risk stratification, San Francisco syncope rule, Emergency medicine, Clinical prediction toolsAbstract
Syncope is a common clinical presentation in emergency departments (ED), often posing significant diagnostic challenges due to its broad differential and the potential for life-threatening underlying causes. Accurate risk stratification is essential to differentiate patients requiring urgent intervention from those who can be safely discharged. The San Francisco syncope rule (SFSR) was developed to aid clinicians in identifying patients at risk of short-term serious outcomes. Despite its widespread adoption, evidence regarding its reliability and predictive accuracy remains mixed. External validation studies have reported variable sensitivity and specificity, with some highlighting its failure to detect neurologic or subtle cardiac causes of syncope. Comparative analysis with other stratification tools such as the OESIL score, ROSE rule, and EGSYS score reveals key differences in design and clinical utility. Each model offers unique strengths but also exhibits important limitations when applied across heterogeneous patient populations. Inconsistent definitions of serious outcomes and variable study methodologies have contributed to difficulty in standardizing syncope assessment across settings. Additionally, neurologic causes are frequently underrepresented in many tools, reducing their diagnostic reach. Biomarkers and imaging have been proposed as adjuncts but are limited by access, cost, and timing. Recent interest has turned to machine learning models capable of integrating broader clinical variables to generate personalized risk profiles. Although early results are encouraging, such approaches require rigorous external validation before widespread clinical use. Overall, existing models offer useful guidance but are not definitive. Risk stratification in syncope should remain a dynamic process informed by evidence-based tools, clinician experience, and ongoing research into more adaptable, data-rich strategies capable of addressing the complexity of syncope presentations in modern emergency care.
Metrics
References
Win-Kuang S, Sheldon Robert S, Benditt David G, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2017;136(5):e60-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000537
Saccilotto RT, Nickel CH, Bucher HC, Steyerberg EW, Bingisser R, Koller MT. San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2011;183(15):E1116-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101326
Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, Sellers KL, Kohn MA, Wells GA. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emergency Med. 2004;43(2):224-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00823-0
Reed MJ, Newby DE, Coull AJ, Prescott RJ, Jacques KG, Gray AJ. The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study. J Am College Cardiol. 2010;55(8):713-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049
Costantino G, Casazza G, Reed M. Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2014;127(11):1126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.022
Grossman SA, Fischer C, Lipsitz LA, Lawrence M, Kenneth S, Scott T, et al. Predicting adverse outcomes in syncope. J Emergency Med. 2007;33(3):233-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.04.001
Birnbaum A, Esses D, Bijur P, Wollowitz A, Gallagher EJ. Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population. Ann Emergency Med. 2008;52(2):151-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.007
Ungar A, Del Rosso A, Giada F, Angelo B, Raffaello F, Fabio Q, et al. Early and late outcome of treated patients referred for syncope to emergency department: the EGSYS 2 follow-up study. Europ Heart J. 2010;31(16):2021-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq017
Sun BC, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Cruz JD, Reporting CtSESRS. Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk‐stratification research. Academic Emergency Med. 2012;19(6):694-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01375.x
Gibson TA, Weiss RE, Sun BC. Predictors of short-term outcomes after syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Western J Emergency Med. 2018;19(3):517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.2.37100
Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M. Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. European Heart J. 2003;24(9):811-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00827-8
Del Rosso A, Ungar A, Maggi R, Giada F, Petix NR, De Santo T, et al. Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score. Heart. 2008;94(12):1620-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.143123
Serrano LA, Hess EP, Bellolio MF, Mohammed HM, Victor MM, Patricia JE, et al. Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emergency Med. 2010;56(4):362-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.013
Probst MA, Gibson T, Weiss RE, Annick NY, Susan EM, David HA, et al. Risk stratification of older adults who present to the emergency department with syncope: the FAINT score. Ann Emergency Med. 2020;75(2):147-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.08.429
Ricci F, Sutton R, Palermi S, Claudio T, Giulia R, Sabina G, et al. Prognostic significance of noncardiac syncope in the general population: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Cardiov Electrophysiol. 2018;29(12):1641-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13715
Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt D, Bergfeldt L, Blanc JJ, Thomsen PEB, et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Europ Heart J. 2001;22(15):1256-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2001.2739
Müller S, Diekmann S, Wenzel M, Horst KH, Johannes T, Ulrike E, et al. Combining machine learning with real-world data to identify gaps in clinical practice guidelines: feasibility study using the prospective German stroke registry and the national acute ischemic stroke guidelines. JMIR Med Informat. 2025;13:e69282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/69282
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
