Comparative outcomes of free flap versus local flap reconstruction in post-traumatic lower limb defects following orthopaedic fixation: a meta-analysis

Authors

  • Osman Suliman Department of Surgery, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan
  • Maan Almehmadi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Danah Alraddadi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Fatimah Alharbi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Khaled Aboufarha Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Nesreen Alsaedi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Malak Alharbi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdullah Alsaedi Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Sara Altom Department of Basic Sciences, Al-Rayan National College of Medicine, Al-Rayan National Colleges, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260031

Keywords:

Post-traumatic lower limb, Local flap reconstruction, Orthopaedic

Abstract

Post-traumatic lower limb defects following orthopedic fixation present significant reconstructive challenges, and the choice between free flap and local flap reconstruction remains critical for limb salvage, functional recovery, and complication prevention. This study systematically evaluated and compared the outcomes of free flap versus local flap reconstruction in the management of post-traumatic lower limb soft-tissue defects after orthopedic fixation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to October 2025, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series that directly compared free and local flap techniques in adult patients. Data were extracted on flap survival, infection and complication rates, time to bone union, functional outcomes, and the need for re-operation. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating that free flaps were more reliable for large or complex defects and were associated with lower rates of deep infection and flap failure in high-risk wounds, while local flaps offered shorter operative times and reduced donor-site morbidity but showed higher rates of partial necrosis and limited effectiveness in extensive defects. Functional outcomes and time to fracture union were generally comparable between the two techniques; however, free flaps provided superior results in cases with compromised soft-tissue envelopes. Both free and local flaps are effective reconstructive options following lower limb trauma with orthopedic fixation, with free flaps being preferable for large or highrisk defects and local flaps remaining suitable for smaller, less complex wounds, emphasizing that defect size, vascular status, and patient-specific factors should guide individualized reconstructive decision-making.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Azoury SC, Stranix JT, Kovach SJ, Levin LS. Principles of Orthoplastic Surgery for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Why Is This Important? J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37(1):42-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthop.2020.12.003

Zeiderman MR, Pu LLQ. Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkab024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab024

Levin SR, Burke PA, Brahmbhatt TS, Siracuse JJ, Slama J, Roh DS. Assessment of Risk Factors Correlated with Outcomes of Traumatic Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(4):e4961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004961

di Summa PG, Sapino G, Wagner D, Maruccia M, Guillier D, Burger H. Combined Free Flaps for Optimal Orthoplastic Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Retrospective Series. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(5):859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050859

Wang P, Lin F, Ma Y, Wang J, Zhou M, Rui Y. Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04522-z

Scampa M, Mégevand V, Suva D, Kalbermatten DF, Oranges CM. Free versus Pedicled Flaps for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13):3672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133672

Serra PL, Boriani F, Khan U, Atzeni M, Figus A. Rate of Free Flap Failure and Return to OR in Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(15):4295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154295

Mégevand V, Suva D, Mohamad M, Hannouche D, Kalbermatten DF, Oranges CM. Muscle vs Fasciocutanous Microvascular Free Flaps for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Clin Med. 2022;11(6):1557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061557

Arellano JA, Alessandri-Bonettu M, Liu HY, Pandya S, Egro FM. Outcomes of Muscle versus Fasciocutanous Free Flap Reconstruction in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(8):e6027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006027

Kaur A, Ang KL, Ali S, Dobbs T, Pope-Jones S, Harry L, et al. Free flaps for lower limb soft tissue reconstruction - A systematic review of complications in 'Silver Trauma' patients. Injury. 2023;23:00294-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.038

Shen AY, Lonie S, Lim K, Farthing H, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Free Flap Monitoring, Salvage, and Failure Timing: A Systematic Review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37(3):300-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722182

AlMugaren FM, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Best Local Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(4):e2774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002774

Romeih M, Al-Shamy AA. The resilience of distally based sural fascio cutaneous flap in soft-tissue defects of lower limb and ankle: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05575-9

Gkiatas I, Korompilia M, Kostas-Agnantis I, Tsirigkakis SE, Stavraki M, Korompilias A. Gastrocnemius pedicled muscle flap for knee and upper tibia soft tissue reconstruction. A useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. Injury. 2021;52(12):3679-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.009

Delgado Perez JA, Rodriguez P, Liette MD, Masadeh S. Medial Hemisoleus Flap for Middle Third of the Tibia Defects. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2020;37(4):621-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2020.05.001

Gupta S, Gupta P, Khichar P, Mohammad A, Escandón JM, Kalra S. Perforator propeller flaps for lower extremity soft-tissue defect reconstruction: Shortening the learning curve. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022;27:101831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101831

Peng P, Dong Z, Wei J, Liu L, Luo Z, Cao S. Reliability of distally based sural flap in elderly patients: comparison between elderly and young patients in a single center. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01175-6

Innocenti M, Dell'Acqua I, Famiglietti M, Vignini L, Menichini G, Ghezzi S. Free perforator flaps vs propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: A cost/effectiveness analysis on a series of 179 cases. Injury. 2019;50:S11-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.039

Kim K, Kim J, Jeong W, Jo T, Park SW, Choi J. Outcome of distal lower leg reconstruction with the propeller perforator flap in diabetic patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021;55(4):242-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1858843

John JR, Tripathy S, Sharma RK, Balan JR, Jadhav C, Bhattacharya S. Peroneal artery perforator-based flaps for reconstruction of middle and lower third post-traumatic defects of the leg. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(11):869-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12556

Kondra K, Roohani I, Swerdlow M, Brown M, O'Brien D, Pekcan A, et al. Outcomes of Local versus Free Flaps for Lower Extremity Trauma. Am Surg. 2022;88(10):2544-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348221103651

Bhullar DS, Karuppiah SV, Aljawadi A, Gillham T, Fakih O, Khamdan K, et al. Local flaps vs. free flaps for complex lower limb fractures: Effect of flap choice on patient-reported outcomes. J Orthop. 2019;17:91-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.016

Koster ITS, Borgdorff MP, Jamaludin FS, de Jong T, Botman M, Driessen C. Strategies Following Free Flap Failure in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review. JPRAS Open. 2023;36:94-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.03.002

Krijgh DD, List EB, Beljaars B, Qiu Shao SS, de Jong T, Rakhorst HA, et al. Patient-reported esthetic outcomes following lower extremity free flap reconstruction: A cross-sectional multicenter study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;93:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.03.007

Al-Khalil M, Roman M, Emam A, Marsden N. Comparison of outcomes between early and delayed weight bearing following lower limb free flaps: an 18-month single-centre study. Plast Aesthet Res. 2023;10:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.102

Kozusko SD, Liu X, Riccio CA, Chang J, Boyd LC, Kokkalis Z, et al. Selecting a free flap for soft tissue coverage in lower extremity reconstruction. Injury. 2019;50:S32-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.045

McGhee JT, Cooper L, Orkar K, Harry L, Cubison T. Systematic review: early versus late dangling after free flap reconstruction of the lower limb. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(8):1017-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.04.001

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Suliman, O., Almehmadi, M., Alraddadi, D., Alharbi, F., Aboufarha, K., Alsaedi, N., Alharbi, M., Alsaedi, A., & Altom, S. (2026). Comparative outcomes of free flap versus local flap reconstruction in post-traumatic lower limb defects following orthopaedic fixation: a meta-analysis. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(2), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260031

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis