Violence in the shadows: how intimate partner violence shapes pregnancy outcomes in rural Uttar Pradesh, India

Archana Shukla; Neetu Purohit

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260685

Authors

Archana Shukla Indian Institute of Health Management and Research (IIHMR), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Neetu Purohit Institute of Health Management and Research (IIHMR), Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260685

Keywords:

Family support, Low birth weight, Preterm birth, Intimate partner violence, Adverse pregnancy outcomes, Partner support

Abstract

Background: Globally, nearly 30% of women experience intimate partner violence (IPV), and in India, NFHS-5 reports that 27% of women face physical and 6.7% sexual violence by their husbands. IPV during pregnancy increases maternal stress and is associated with adverse birth outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm birth. This study examines the association between psychosocial conditions within intimate partnerships and adverse birth outcomes in a rural setting of Uttar Pradesh.

Methodology: A case–control study was conducted in Raebareli district, Uttar Pradesh, including 425 recently delivered women (212 cases with LBW/preterm births and 213 controls without low-birth-weight babies).

Results: Approximately 20% (83/425) of women reported experiencing IPV (physical or emotional) during pregnancy. Among these, 72.9% had adverse outcomes. Specifically, 63 women (75%) had LBW infants, and 34 women (40%) reported physical violence such as hitting, slapping, or pushing (OR=4.32; 95% CI: 2.02–9.27; z=3.7), indicating a statistically significant association between IPV and adverse outcomes. Conversely, 193 women (45%) reported receiving high levels of emotional and practical support from their partners. Among them, 61% delivered normal birth weight babies, with partner support reducing the risk of LBW by 22% (OR=0.459; 95% CI: 0.31–0.67; p<0.001).

Conclusion: IPV is strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, whereas partner support acts as a protective factor in rural Uttar Pradesh.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

World Health Organization. Newborn mortality: levels and trends in child mortality report 2021. Geneva: WHO. 2021.

Devries KM, Mak JY, García-Moreno C. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240937

Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1165–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X

Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India fact sheet. Mumbai: IIPS. 2021.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: Uttar Pradesh state fact sheet. Mumbai: IIPS. 2021.

World Health Organization. Global nutrition targets 2025: low birth weight policy brief. Geneva: WHO. 2014.

García-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira AF, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1567–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61837-7

Shah PS, Shah J. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and birth outcomes: a systematic review. J Women Health. 2010;19(11):2017–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2051

James L, Brodie E, Kemp A, et al. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and maternal health service use. BMJ Open. 2013;3:2291.

Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rucke M, Rose M, Dudenhausen J, Pincus-Knackstedt MK, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking, and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):869–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del432

World Health Organization. Violence against women: intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Geneva: WHO. 2013.

Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Census of India 2011: District census handbook, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Government of India. 2011.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India. Health Management Information System (HMIS): Uttar Pradesh state data. New Delhi: MoHFW. 2019–2021.

Silverman JG, Decker MR, Reed E, Raj A. Intimate partner violence prior to and during pregnancy among US women: associations with maternal and neonatal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(1):140–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.052

Hill A, Pallitto C, McCleary-Sills J, Garcia-Moreno C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;133(3):269–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023

Ghosh JKC, Wilhelm MH, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lombardi CA, Ritz B. Paternal support, maternal stress, and birth outcomes in urban Los Angeles. Health Psychol. 2010;29(5):427–35.

Surkan PJ, Peterson KE, Hughes MD, Gottlieb BR. The role of social support in maternal depression and child growth. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(7):875–84.

Singh A, Srinivasan K. Family support and maternal health care utilization in India. J Health Manag. 2017;19(1):72–82.

Alio AP, Lewis CA, Scarborough K, Harris K, Fiscella K. A community perspective on the role of fathers during pregnancy: a qualitative study. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2010;10:21.

Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2015;69(6):604–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204784