Factors influencing the choice of healthcare provider among Riyadh residents: the role of social media and marketing strategies

Authors

  • Khalid Khulaif E. Alanazi Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Shibli Sayeed Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Majed D. Alanazi Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Daheeya Saeed Alenazi Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ayman M. Ababneh Roya Hakim Medical Company, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammad Shibly Khan King Salman Hospital, Riyadh First Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Manal Helayel Almutairi Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20254248

Keywords:

Digital marketing, Healthcare provider choice, Online reviews, Riyadh, Social media, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: In Riyadh, people are increasingly choosing healthcare providers through digital channels, in addition to traditional trust sources. In this study, we examined the factors influencing provider choice and how search engines, social media, online reviews and marketing affect clients' decision-making processes.

Methods: Authors conducted a cross-sectional survey among residents of Riyadh using a structured Arabic questionnaire distributed online. We employed a quota-guided, stratified convenience sampling approach based on gender, age, education and income. We provided descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and ANOVA. We also looked at correlations between digital influence and provider choice outcomes.

Results: The most important factors for choosing a provider were perceived clinical quality (74.9%), provider reputation (68.0%) and access to specialized physicians (63.2%). Cost (50.2%), location/accessibility (46.1%) and insurance coverage (45.2%) also played significant roles. Personal recommendations were the primary source of information (80.8%), followed by online ratings/reviews (53.9%) and official provider websites (38.1%). Google was the primary source of healthcare information (79.2%), while social media primarily raised awareness and assisted with initial shortlisting. People were cautious about advertisements and unverified reviews, often reporting “fake reviews” and “paid advertising” as significant challenges (66.4% and 65.1%, respectively). Choosing a provider based on social media ads/reviews was more common among females, employed individuals, insured participants and higher-income groups (p<0.05 for each).

Conclusions: Digital channels have a significant impact on the discovery and shortlisting of providers in Riyadh. Improving service quality, increasing the availability of specialists, providing transparent pricing and ensuring the authenticity of reviews could enhance patient decision-making and trust.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kraus S, Schiavone F, Pluzhnikova A, Invernizzi AC. Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. J Bus Res. 2021;123:557-67.

AlOmeir O, Almuqbil M, Hussam Alsawadi A. An exploration of factors influencing the selection of generic and innovator medicines in Saudi Arabia using an observational cross-sectional study. Saudi Pharma J. 2024;32(4):862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102021

Abdulaziz AA, Algosaibi AM, Alquhaibi AS. Digital healthcare innovation and development in Saudi Arabia during and beyond COVID-19. Science, Technol and Soc. 2012;28(3):370–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231178229

Kraus S, Schiavone F, Pluzhnikova A, Invernizzi AC. Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. J Business Res. 2021;123:557-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.030

Alanzi T, Altuwailib M, Saadah AM, Alanezi F. Perception of healthcare providers about the use of social media to manage a healthy diet in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health. 2021;9:543913.

Alanzi T, Altuwailib M, Saadah AM, Alanezi F. Perception of healthcare providers about the use of social media to manage a healthy diet in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health. 2021;9:543913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.543913

Ellis RJ, Yuce TK, Hewitt DB, Merkow RP, Kinnier CV, Johnson JK, et al. National evaluation of patient preferences in selecting hospitals and health care providers. Medical Care. 2020;58(10):867-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001374

Al-Doghaither AH, Abdelrhman BM, Saeed AW, Magzoub ME. Factors influencing patient choice of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Royal Soc Promot Health. 2003;123(2):105-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146642400312300215

Censkowsky P, Waidelich P, Shishlov I, Steffen B. Quantifying the shift of public export finance from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Nature Comm. 2025;16(1):900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-55981-0

Farsi D. Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers. J Med Res. 2021;2:759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.30379

Dash S, Shakyawar SK, Sharma M, Kaushik S. Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. J Big Data. 2019;6(1):1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0

Chen J, Wang Y. Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. J Med Res. 2021;23(5):17917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/17917

Nagmeldin FK, Osman GM. Dynamics of Interactive Audience in The Digital Environment: An Analytical Study with an Application to The BBC Trending Program. Inf Sci Letters. 2023;12(11):2979-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/121112

Dwivedi YK, Ismagilova E, Hughes DL. Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. Int J Inform Manag. 2021;59:102168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Luo A, Qin L, Yuan Y, Yang Z, Liu F, Huang P, Xie W. The effect of online health information seeking on physician-patient relationships: systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2022;24(2):23354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/23354

Kington RS, Arnesen S, Chou WY, Curry SJ, Lazer D, Villarruel AM. Identifying credible sources of health information in social media: principles and attributes. NAM perspectives. 2021;2021:10-31478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31478/202107a

Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J. Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2021;23(1):17187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/17187

Sobczak K, Leoniuk K. Doctors’ attitudes in the situation of delivering bad news: patients’ experience and expectations. Arch Med Sci. 2021;19(4):921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/112756

Butt S, Raza A, Siddiqui R, Saleem Y, Cook B, Khan H. Healthcare employment landscape: comparing job markets for professionals in developed and developing countries. J Work-Applied Man. 2024;16(1):84-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-06-2023-0052

Coombs NC, Campbell DG, Caringi J. A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2

Hong YA, Liang C, Radcliff TA, Wigfall LT, Street RL. What do patients say about doctors online. A systematic review of studies on patient online reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):12521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/12521

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Alanazi, K. K. E., Sayeed, S., Alanazi, M. D., Alenazi, D. S., Ababneh, A. M., Khan, M. S., & Almutairi, M. H. (2025). Factors influencing the choice of healthcare provider among Riyadh residents: the role of social media and marketing strategies. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 13(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20254248

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles