Contraceptive decision-making among currently married couples in Kerala: a mixed-methods study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20254447Keywords:
Contraceptive decision making, Empowerment, Gender roles, Reproductive autonomyAbstract
Background: Contraceptive decision making refers to the ability of a women freely choose the contraceptive method they desired through the process of informed decision-making by effectively minimizing unnecessary pressure from important others. Women’s autonomy is often constrained by gender power imbalances and sociocultural norms. In Kerala, despite better educational and economic status, limited evidence suggests these advantages enhance their decision-making regarding contraception.
Methods: A community-based mixed-methods study was conducted in Thrissur and Thiruvananthapuram districts in Kerala. Multistage cluster sampling was employed in both the districts to get a total sample of 330 for the quantitative component. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were done to estimate the proportion and associated factors. Additionally, 19 in-depth interviews were conducted using purposive sampling to explore decision-making dynamics.
Results: Only 18.2% of women reported making contraceptive decisions independently. Employed women (APR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.84–4.71, p<0.001) and women with both male and female children were more likely to decide independently (APR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.46–5.30, p=0.002). Qualitative findings highlighted decision-making process among couples are often hindered due to couples’ limited knowledge, misconceptions and fear of side effects.
Conclusions: In Kerala, independent contraceptive decision-making among women remains relatively low. Limited knowledge hindered women’s ability to negotiate contraceptive use with their partners, often conform to prevailing social norms. Thus, interventions and policies should focus on raising awareness along with empowering women through financial independence and addressing deep-rooted social and gender norms.
Metrics
References
World Health Organization. Contraception. World Health Organization; 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics. Accessed on 28 April 2025.
Alemayehu B, Kassa GM, Teka YM, Zeleke LB, Abajobir AA, Alemu AA. Married Women’s Decision-Making Power in Family Planning Use and its Determinants in Basoliben, Northwest Ethiopia. Open Access J Contracept. 2020;11:43–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S250462
Global Goals Indicator 5.6.1: research on factors that determine women’s ability to make decisions about sexual and reproductive health and rights. Volume I. UNFPA. 2019.
Aterido R, Beck T, Iacovone L. Access to Finance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is There a Gender Gap. World Dev. 2013;47:102–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.013
Obiyan MO, Kumar A. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Maternal Health Care Services in Nigeria: Trends Between 1990 and 2008. Sage Open. 2015;5(4):76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614070
World Health Organization. Fair share for health and care: gender and the undervaluation of health and care work. World Health Organization; 2024. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/13-03-2024-who-report-reveals-gender-inequalities-at-the-root-of-global-crisis-in-health-and-care-work. Accessed on 28 April 2025.
Pandey A, Singh KK. Contraceptive use before first pregnancy by women in India (2005-2006): Determinants and differentials Biostatistics and Methods. BMC Public Health. 2015;29;15(1):4587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2652-y
Sundari Ravindran TK. Women and contraceptive decision-making in Kerala. The India Forum; 2025. Available at: https://www.theindiaforum.in women-and-contraceptive-decision-making-kerala. Accessed on 28 April 2025.
Statistics Division DK. NFHS 1–5 Fact Sheet. Statistics Division DK; 2022. Available at: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NFHS-1-to-5-Fact-Sheet-Kerala.pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2025.
Kabeer N. The conditions and consequences of choice: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development; 1999. Available at: https://www.unrisd.org. Accessed on 30 April 2025.
Shrivastav V, Yogesh M, Parmar D, Gandhi R, Sojitra SA, Subhash KT, et al. Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access and Sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India. Contracept Reprod Med. 2025;1;10(1):735.
Tomar S, Dehingia N, Dey AK, Chandurkar D, Raj A, Silverman JG. Associations of intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion with contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh, India: How associations differ across contraceptive methods. PLoS One. 2020;1:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241008
Sinha S, Sharma SM, Sharma M, Bankawar V. Prevalence of contraceptive practices and its associated factors among women in an urban slum area of North India: An observational study. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2023;10(3):342–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.067
Dugg P, Chhabra P, Sharma AK. Contraceptive use and unmet need for family planning among HIV-positive women: A hospital-based study. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64(1):32–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_123_19
Tesfa D, Tiruneh SA, Azanaw MM, Gebremariam AD, Engidaw MT, Tiruneh M, et al. Determinants of contraceptive decision making among married women in Sub-Saharan Africa from the recent Demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Women Health. 2022;1;22(1):648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01636-x
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Navigating Megatrends: The ICPD Programme of Action for a Sustainable Future. ICPD30 Think Piece: The Future of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. New York: UNFPA; 2024. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/navigating-megatrends-icpd30-think-pieces. Accessed on 23 October 2025.
United Nations, Division for the Advancement of Women, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. CEDAW General Recommendation No. 24: Article 12 of the Convention (Women and Health). Adopted at the Twentieth Session of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 1999. (Contained in Document A/54/38/Rev.1, chap. I). Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/Health/GR24.pdf. Accessed on 23 October 2025.
Nazarbegian M, Averbach S, Johns NE, Ghule M, Silverman J, Lundgren R, et al. Associations between Contraceptive Decision-Making and Marital Contraceptive Communication and use in Rural Maharashtra, India. Stud Fam Plann. 2022;53(4):617–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12214
Ajayi K V., Panjwani S, Wilson K, Garney WR. Using the Social-Ecological Model to Understand the Current Perspective of Contraceptive Use in the United States: A Narrative Literature Review. Women. 2021;1;1(4):212–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/women1040019
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019–21 [Internet]. IIPS and ICF. 2021. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/publications. Accessed on 27 April 2025.
Char A, Saavala M, Kulmala T. Influence of mothers-in-law on young couples’ family planning decisions in rural India. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(35):154–62.
Madden T, Secura GM, Nease RF, Politi MC, Peipert JF. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051
Reed E, Donta B, Dasgupta A, Ghule M, Battala M, Nair S, et al. Access to Money and Relation to Women’s Use of Family Planning Methods Among Young Married Women in Rural India. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(6):1203–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1921-4
Somefun OD, Wandera SO, Odimegwu C. Media Exposure and HIV Testing Among Youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence From Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Sage Open. 2019;1;9(2):536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019851551
Shrivastav V, M Y, Parmar D, Gandhi R, Sojitra SA, Subhash KT, et al. Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access and sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India. Contracept Reprod Med. 2015;10(1):23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00362-7
Char A, Saavala M, Kulmala T. Influence of mothers-in-law on young couples’ family planning decisions in rural India. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(35):154–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(10)35497-8
Silverman JG, Raj A. Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Global Barriers to Women’s Reproductive Control. PLoS Med. 2014;1;11(9):758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723
Dougherty A, Kayongo A, Deans S, Mundaka J, Nassali F, Sewanyana J, et al. Knowledge and use of family planning among men in rural Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2018;26;18(1):294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6173-3
Diamond-Smith N, Vaishnav Y, Choudhary U, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, et al. Individual empowerment and community norm effects of engaging young husbands in reproductive health in rural India: findings from a pilot study. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01878-y
Okigbo CC, Speizer IS, Domino ME, Curtis SL, Halpern CT, Fotso JC. Gender norms and modern contraceptive use in urban Nigeria: A multilevel longitudinal study. BMC Women Health. 2018;29;18(1):576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0664-3
Sarfraz M, Hamid S, Kulane A, Jayasuriya R. ‘The wife should do as her husband advises’: Understanding factors influencing contraceptive use decision making among married Pakistani couples—Qualitative study. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):280923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277173
Thulaseedharan JV. Contraceptive use and preferences of young married women in Kerala, India. Open Access J Contracept. 2018;9:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S152178
Dassah C, Domapielle MK, Sumankuuro J. Contraceptive use among female head porters: implications for health policy and programming in Ghana. Heliyon. 2022;1;8(12):86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11985
Bryant A, Fernandez-Lamothe A, Kuppermann M. Attitudes toward birth spacing among low-income, postpartum women: A qualitative analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(7):1440–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0911-9
Schuler SR, Rottach E, Mukiri P. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: A qualitative study. J Public Health Afr. 2011;2(2):102–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2011.e25
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
