Efficacy of enzyme-based irrigants in endodontics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20253714Keywords:
Enzyme-based irrigants, Endodontics, Biofilm disruption, Proteolytic enzymes, Root canal disinfectionAbstract
Effective root canal therapy depends on a combination of mechanical instrumentation and chemical irrigation to eliminate bacteria, necrotic tissue, and debris from the complex anatomy of the root canal system. Traditional irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite and EDTA are widely used due to their antimicrobial properties and ability to dissolve organic and inorganic matter. However, these agents carry disadvantages including cytotoxicity, unpleasant taste, tissue irritation, and the potential to weaken dentinal structure. In response to these limitations, enzyme-based irrigants have been introduced as a biologically compatible alternative with selective action on organic components. Enzymes such as papain, bromelain, subtilisin, ficin, and keratinase act by breaking peptide bonds in denatured proteins, leading to the degradation of tissue remnants and the disruption of microbial biofilms. These irrigants have demonstrated effective smear layer modification without aggressive erosion of dentin and have shown compatibility with passive irrigation systems. Their activity under physiological pH conditions, combined with low toxicity and reduced risk of periapical irritation, makes them particularly useful in patients with open apices, complex canal morphology, or heightened sensitivity. Despite these advantages, limitations persist. Enzymatic efficiency may vary depending on tissue type, pH fluctuations, and anatomical challenges. Storage requirements, formulation stability, and compatibility with other endodontic materials remain areas of concern. Some studies have also noted incomplete tissue clearance when used as a sole irrigant. Current evidence supports their use as adjuncts rather than replacements in most clinical settings. Ongoing research is focused on improving formulation consistency, delivery mechanisms, and integration into standardized irrigation protocols. Enzyme-based irrigants present a promising evolution in endodontic disinfection strategies, offering a more tissue-friendly alternative that aligns with minimally invasive and biologically respectful treatment goals.
Metrics
References
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endodontics. 2006;32(5):389-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
Stojicic S, Zivkovic S, Qian W, Zhang H, Haapasalo M. Tissue dissolution by sodium hypochlorite: effect of concentration, temperature, agitation, and surfactant. J Endodont. 2010;36(9):1558-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.021
Usri K, Prisinda D, Malinda Y. Effect of Different Endodontic Irrigants on Reduction of Bacterial Load: Literature Review. J Int Dental Med Res. 2025;18(3):1414-28.
Kishen A, Shrestha A. Nanoparticles for dentin tissue stabilization. In: Nanotechnology in Endodontics: Current and Potential Clinical Applications. Springer. 2015;121-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13575-5_7
Niazi S, Clark D, Do T, Gilbert SC, Foschi F, Mannocci F, et al. The effectiveness of enzymic irrigation in removing a nutrient‐stressed endodontic multispecies biofilm. Int Endodont J. 2014;47(8):756-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12214
Francinelli J, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, D'Urso D, Mancuso E, Moretto GM, et al. Root canal irrigants and their role in the adhesion of pre-endodontic restorations. Clin Oral Investigat. 2025;29(7):340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06421-2
Darrag A. Effectiveness of different final irrigation solutions on smear layer removal in intraradicular dentin. Tanta Dent J. 2014;11(2):93-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2014.06.002
Kumar AG, Joseph B, Nandagopal S, Sankarganesh P, Jagdish S. Experimental human root canal irrigant NaOCl against Enterococcus faecalis and 3T3, and determination of cytotoxicity effect. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2019;12(2):965-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1723
Satti P, Kakarla P, Avula SSJ, Muppa R, Rompicharla SVK, Biswas S. Indigenous irrigants as potent antimicrobials in endodontic treatment: An: in vitro: study. J Indian Society Pedodont Prevent Dent. 2019;37(3):275-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_112_19
Zand V, Mokhtari H, Lotfi M, Saeed R, Aydin S, Sina BZ, et al. A scanning electron microscope study on the effect of an experimental irrigation solution on smear layer removal. Iranian Endodont J. 2014;9(2):131.
Al-Mallah S, Al-Naimi A. An Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Hydrogen Peroxide Endodontic Irrigant. Al-Rafidain Dental J. 2023;23(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/rden.2021.129103.01069
De Oliveira GC, Ferraz CS, Júnior CVA, Pithon MM. Chlorhexidine gel associated with papain in pulp tissue dissolution. Restorative Dentist Endodont. 2013;38(4):210-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.210
Al-Badri H, Al-Shammaree SA, Banerjee A, Al-Taee LA. The in-vitro development of novel enzyme-based chemo-mechanical caries removal agents. J Dentist. 2023;138:104714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104714
Mitra M, Kaul R, Chengappa DM. Efficacy of Papain Gel-A Smart Alternative to Conventional Methods of Carious Dentin Removal: An In Vitro Study. J South Asian Associat Pediat Dent. 2022;5(3):152-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3247
Matos G. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Novel Endodontic Irrigant Triton, Saint Louis University; 2025.
Chakravorty S, Nair VV, Kumar S, Chopra K, Salyankar MS, Kumar SD. Chemomechanical caries removal: An update. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2022;10(1):8-13.
Almeshari SAA. Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of bio-ceramic root canal sealers, University of Leeds. 2020.