Anthropometric evaluation of the olecranon coronoid angle in the North Indian population for sex identification

Vandana Sidhu; Neelam Bala; Bavil Sidhu; Kulbir Kaur; Vijay Laxmi

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252923

Authors

Vandana Sidhu Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
Neelam Bala Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Bavil Sidhu Department of Immunohematology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Kulbir Kaur Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Vijay Laxmi Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252923

Keywords:

Coronoid process, Olecranon-coronoid angle, Trochlear notch, Ulna

Abstract

Background: The olecranon-coronoid angle, a significant anatomical parameter in the proximal ulna, is increasingly being studied as a potential indicator of biological sex in skeletal remains. This study investigated the morphometric variability of this angle in the north Indian population, aiming to establish its utility as a reliable sex indicator. The data thus obtained were tabulated, scrutinized, analyzed, and compared with the earlier studies wherever possible. By analyzing a sample of adult ulnae, the study provided insights into population-specific differences and their implications for forensic anthropology and bioarcheology. If any variant from the normal was observed, an attempt has been made to explain the same.

Methods: A cross-sectional morphometric study was conducted on 100 dry, intact adult ulnae (right and left) of known sex. These 100 adult human ulnae were obtained from embalmed cadavers used for dissection in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Amritsar, and formed the material for the current study. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS.

Results: In the study of 100 ulnae (M:F- 50:50), the olecranon coronoid angle was determined to be 22.56°±3.32 in males and 15.71°±4.39 in females.

Conclusions: The olecranon-coronoid angle exhibits significant sexual dimorphism, and its measurement is helpful in reconstruction of elbow disorders observed after treatment of distal humerus fractures. The primary objective of applying anthropometric methods in anatomy and forensic medicine is to assist law enforcement agencies in establishing the personal identity of unknown human remains.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Krogman WM, İşcan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd edn. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1986.

Krishan K, Kanchan T, Sharma A. Sex estimation from morphological and morphometric characteristics of ulna in a north Indian population. J Forens Leg Med. 2012;19(1):18-23.

Standring S, edr. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 42nd edn. London: Elsevier; 2020.

Ebite LE, Ozoko TC, Eweka AO, Otuaga PO, Oni AO, Om’Iniabohs FA. Height: ulna ratio: a method of stature estimation in a rural community in Edo state, Nigeria. Internet J Forens Sci. 2008;3(1):12-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/1d32

Purkait R, Chandra H. An anthropometric investigation into the probable cause of formation of “carrying angle” a sex indicator. JIAFM. 2004;26(1):971-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971097320040105

Singh S, Singh G, Singh SP. Identification of sex from the ulna. Indian J Med Res. 1974;62(5):731-5.

Godyeki M. On the certainty of sex determination based on the femur, ulna, and humerus. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris. 1957;8(10).

Maia Neto MA. About the value of the large sigmoid cavity of the ulna as a sexual character. Contribution to the Study of Anthropologie, an anthropology institute. University of Coimbra Portugal. 1959;12.

Purkait R. Measurements of ulna: a new method for determination of sex. J Forens Sci. 2001;46(4):924-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15071J

Last RJ. Anatomy- regional and applied. 6th edn. London. Churchill Livingstone Longman; 1978.

Williams A, Standring S, Ellis H, Haely J. Gray’s Anatomy. London: Elsevier; 2005.

Mall FP. On the angle of the elbow. Am Anat. 1905;4:391‐404.

Jones FW. Bachanan’s manual of Anatomy. London: Bailliere Tindall and cox Ltd.; 1953.

Langer. On the angle of the elbow. Am J Ant. 1905;4:391-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000040402

Kapandji IA. Physiology of the Joints E-Book: Physiology of the Joints E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Mall G, Hubig M, Buttner A, Kuznik J, Penning R, Graw M. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. J Forens Sci. 2001;117:23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00445-X

Badkur P, Nath S. Use of regression analysis in reconstruction of maximum bone length and living stature from fragmentary measures of the ulna. Forens Sci Int. 1990;45(1-2):15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(90)90217-M