Knowledge, attitude, and practices of chewing areca nut among rural based community of Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh: a cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20254431Keywords:
Arecanut, Women, Knowledge, AttitudeAbstract
Background: Chewing areca (betel) nut ranks among the top five traditional oral habits worldwide. It contains several alkaloids from the pyridine group, with arecoline being the most significant. Nitrosated derivatives of arecal alkaloids are linked to cancer risk. Globally, it is the fourth most prevalent psychoactive substance and is classified as a group-1 carcinogen. Objectives were to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to betel nut chewing among residents in and around Putlampalli village in the Kadapa district.
Methods: A questionnaire, developed by Khan et al along with informed consent, was used as the instrument. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 285 participants, featuring 28 questions to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of betel nut chewing in the rural areas of the Kadapa district.
Results: Among the 285 participants, 84.9% were females. The 26% believed that chewing betel nut is not harmful to health, while 30% acknowledged that it can cause throat cancer. Additionally, 17% did not consider betel nut chewing addictive, 71% were willing to quit the habit, whereas 29% were not. Furthermore, 63% reported using betel nut once every four weeks, and 3% chewed it daily. A significant 70% learned to chew betel nut from family members, while 20.7% and 2.1% learned from advertisements and tradition, respectively.
Conclusions: A higher percentage of women consume betel nut compared to men. Most individuals learn the habit from family members. The risk of oral cancer increases when the quid contains tobacco. Periodic screening and awareness programs are recommended.
Metrics
References
IARC Betel quid and areca nut chewing and some arecanut-derived nitrosamines. In: IARC monograph. 2004;85.
Franke AA, Lai JF, Kawamoto CT, Pokhrel P, Herzog TA. Areca (betel) nut consumption: An underappreciated cause of cancer. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(12):400-3.
Croucher R, Islam S. Socio-economic aspects of areca nut use. Addiction Biol. 2002;7(1):139-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556210120091518
Williams S, Malik A, Chowdhury S, Chauhan S. Sociocultural aspects of areca nut use. Addiction Biol. 2002;7(1):147-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135562101200100147
Strickland SS. Anthropological perspectives on use of the areca nut. Addiction Biol. 2002;7(1):85-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556210120091446
Nelson BS, Heischober B. Betel nut: a common Drug used by naturalized citizens from India Far East, and the South Pacific islands. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;34(2):238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70239-8
Warnakulasuriya S, Peters T. Introduction: biology, Medical and socioeconomic aspects of arecanut leaves. Addict Biol. 2002;7(1):75-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556210020091428
Mazahir S, Malik R, Maqsood M, Merchant KA, Malik F, Majeed A, et al. Socio-demographic correlates of betel, Areca, and smokeless tobacco use as a high-risk behaviour for head and neck cancers in a squatter settlement pf Karachi, Pakistan. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006;1(1):10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-1-10
Akhtar S. Areca nut chewing and esophageal squamous Cell carcinoma risk in Asians: A meta-analysis of case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(2):257-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-0113-9
Mehtha FS, Pindborg JJ, Gupta PC, Daftary DK. Epidemologic and histologic study of oral cancer and leukoplakia among 50,915 villagers in India. Cancer. 1969;24(4):832-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196910)24:4<832::AID-CNCR2820240427>3.0.CO;2-U
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2012.
Mehta FS, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Choksi SK. An epidemiologic study of oral cancer and precancerous conditions among 101,761 villagers in Maharashtra, India. Int J Cancer 1972;10:134-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910100118
Rai B, Bramhankar M. Tobacco use among Indian states: Key findings from the latest demographic health survey 2019-2020. Tobacco Prevention Cessation. 2021;7(3):19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/132466
Khan MS, Bawany FI, Shah SR, Hussain M, Arshad MH, Nisar N. Comparision of knowledge, attitude, and practices of betel nut users in two socio-economic areas of Karachi. Student Corner. 2023;63(10):1319-25.
Mehrtash H, Duncan K, Parascandola M, David A, Gritz ER, Gupta PC, et al. Defining a global research and policy agenda for betel quid and areca nut. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e767-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30460-6
WHO. WHO tobacco, a global status report. World health organization, 1997. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/tobacco. Assessed on 20 September 2025.
Arvind K, Kunal O, Singh R, Kharodia N, Pradhan A, Sethuraman L, et al. Assessment of areca nut use, practice, and dependency among people in Guwahati, Assam: a cross-sectional study. E-cancer. 2021;15:1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1198
Hussain A, Zaheer S, Shafique K. Reasons for betel quid chewing amongst dependent and non-dependent betel quid chewing adolescents: a school-based cross-sectional survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018;13(1):16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-018-0154-5
Chadda R, Sengupta S. Tobacco use by Indian adolescents. Tob Induc Dis. 2002;1(2):111-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-1-2-111
Farrar J, Hotez PJ, Junghanss T, Kang G, Lalloo D, White NJ. Manson's Tropical Infectious Diseases (Twenty-third Edition), W.B. Saunders. 2014;1197-214.
Tseng CH. Betel nut chewing is associated with hypertension in Taiwanese type 2 diabetic patients. Hypertens Res. 2008;31(3):417-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.31.417
Ebbert JO, Rowland LC, Montori VM, Vickers KS, Erwin PJ, Dale LC. Treatments for spit tobacco use: a quantitative systematic review. Addiction. 2003;98(5):569-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00378.x