Glaucoma: a new approach for detection in rural eye care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20173353Keywords:
Glaucoma, Intraocular pressure, Eyelid, Contradiction matrix, Expanded matrix, Innovative principleAbstract
Background:There is a dare need of a device for the measurement of intraocular pressure by making the contact of plunger with closed eyelid eliminating the need of anesthesia and expert ophthalmologist. The main purpose of this study is to develop a device for the indicative measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) of eyeball, a key cause for glaucoma.
Methods:TRIZ ‘The theory of solving inventor’s problem’ is an era of technical development and innovation. Developing a device for detecting glaucoma by using TRIZ and top ten innovative principles recommended by expanded TRIZ matrix can exceed the disadvantages that classic tonometer has. The field of Ophthalmology will be experiencing a paradigm shift towards the use of collaborative approach of classical and expanded TRIZ.
Results:In early diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma accurate measurement of IOP is important. The methods and devices which are available for the measurement of IOP have their own limitations which cause discomfort to the patients during measurement and needs anesthesia. This approach shows a good result in development of a device for detecting glaucoma in patient’s eye through eyelid instead of cornea.
Conclusions:There is a substantial need for early detection and diagnosis of glaucoma in rural and remote areas (worldwide). This study has demonstrated the development of new device for detection of glaucoma using TRIZ, will help the medical practitioners in rural and remote areas for detection of glaucoma.
Metrics
References
Hitchings RA. Glaucoma: an area of darkness. Eye. 2009;23:1764-74.
Ferreira JA, Deoliveira P, Dasilva PM, Murta JN. Numerical simulation of aqueous humor flow from healthy to pathologic situations. Pre-Publicacoes do Departamento de Matematica Universidade de Coimbra. 2013: 13-27.
Goel M, Picciani RG, Lee RK, Bhattacharya SK. Aqueous humor dynamics:A review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2010;4:52-9.
Villamarin A, Roy S, Hasballa R, Vardoulis O, Reymond P. 3D simulation of aqueous flow in the human eye. Med Engineering Physics. 2012;34:1462-70.
Ju Y, Wang B, Xie J, Huang L, Huang S, Huang X. Dynamic model of the aqueous humor circulation with application to simulation of the treatment for primary open angle glaucoma, 2005; Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference Shanghai, China.
Pinar-Sueiro S, Rodriguez-Puertas R, Vecino E. Cannabinoid applications in glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011;86(1):16-23.
Auvray P, Rousseau L, Lissorgues G, Soulier F, Potin O, Bernard S, et al. A passive pressure sensor for continuously measuring the intraocular pressure in glaucomatous patients. IRBM. 2012;33:117-22.
Chakrabarti M, John SR, Chakrabarti A. 180 years of evolution in Tonometry. Kerala J Ophthalmol. 2009;21(2):173-81.
Nakagawa T. Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/ USIT 2007; TRIZ future conference. Available at www.sciencedirect.com. Accessed on 15 June 2016.
Schweizer T. Problem solving with TRIZ:Historical perspectives and understanding ideality 2003. Available at: http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/ mma/2003/papers/04.pdf. Accessed on 7 March 2016.
Altshuller G. And suddenly the inventor appeared the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Technical Innovation: 2nd edition. 1996: 1-171.
Mann D, Dewluf S. Updating the contradiction matrix by CREAX Press. 2003.
Mann D. Updating TRIZ: 2006-2008 patent research findings 2008; The Fourth TRIZ Symposium, Japan.
Mann D. Complexity increases and then …. (Thoughts from natural system evolution). The TRIZ J. 2003; Available at: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2003/01/a/. Accessed on 7 August 2014.
Mann D. Case Studies in TRIZ: Helicopter Particle Separator. The TRIZ J. 1999. Available at http://www.trizjournal.com/archives/1999/02/a/index.htm. Accessed on 6 August 2015.
Mann D. Comparing the Classical and new contradiction matrix part1-zooming out The TRIZ Journal 2004. Available at: http://www.trizjournal. com/archives/2004/04/01.pdf Accessed on August 2015.
Mann D. Comparing the Classical and new contradiction matrix part 2-zooming in 2004. Available at: http://www.trizjournal.com/archives/ 004/07/05.pdf. Accessed on 5 June 2015.
Mann D. Hands-On Systematic Innovation CREAX Press; 2002.
Mann D. Assessing the Accuracy of the Contradiction Matrix for Recent Mechanical Inventions. TRIZ J. 2002. Available at http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2002/02/e/. Accessed on 12 May 2015.
TRIZ 40 inventive principles Available at: http://www.triz40.com/aff_Principles_TRIZ.php. Accessed on 17 August 2014.
Matrix version pdf. 1997. Available at: http://www.triz-journal.com. Accessed on 13 August 2014.
Expnded TRIZ contradiction matrix 2010. Available at: http://www.biotriz.com/sites/default/files/ Expandable%20TRIZ%20Matrix%20BioTRIZ.pdf. Accessed on 20 August 2014.
Polyvasa PP, Peymanb G, Enikova ET. Trans-scleral tactile tonometry: An instrumented approach. Med Engineering Physics. 2013;35:937–43.
Chen HY, Huang ML, Wang IJ, Chen WC. Correlation between Stratus OCT and GDx VCC in early glaucoma, ocular hypertension and glaucoma suspect eyes. J Optom. 2012;5(1):24–30.
Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76(3):319–24,
Auvray P, Rousseau L, Lissorgues G, Soulier F, Potin O, Bernard S, et al. A passive pressure sensor for continuously measuring the intraocular pressure in glaucomatous patients. IRBM. 2012;33:117-22.
Nakai M, Nagaoka T, Yoshizawa I, Fujita A, Takeda S, Yanasima K, et al. Development of Noninvasive Tonometer using Resonance Phenomenon Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS San Francisco, CA, USA: 2004.
Zhang X, Wu X, Ma J, Lu R, Zhao Q. Quantitative analysis of the effect of optical probe positioning on the measurements of flattened diameter of ocular corneafor applanation tonometry. Proc Eng. 2012;29:84–8.
Wallace J, Lowell HG. Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer. A clinical evaluation. Br J Ophthal. 1968;52(7):568–72.
Pohjola S, Niiranen M. Clinical evaluation of the Draeger applanation tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol. 1968;46(6):1159–64.
Moses RA, Grodzki WJ. The Macaky-Marg tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol. 1971;49(5):800–4.
Evans K, Wishart PK. Intraocular pressure measurement in children using the keeler pulsair tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1992;12(3):287–90.
Fernandes P, DA-az-Rey JA, QueirA3s A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J. Comparison of the i-care rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2005;25(5):436–40.
Ogbuehi KC. The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses:a comparison of two noncontact tonometers. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(3):118–28.
Doherty MD, Carrim ZI, O’Neill DP. Diaton tonometry: an assessment of validity and preference against Goldmann tonometry. Clin Exp Ophthal. 2011.
Herse P, Hans A, Hall J, Langejans J, Markoulli M. The proview eye pressure monitor:influence of clinical factors on accuracy and agreement with the Goldmann tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2005;25(5):416–20.
Lim TC, Chattopadhyay S, Acharya UR. A survey and comparative study on the instruments for glaucoma detection. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(2):129–39.
Piletskii GK. A device for measuring intraocular pressure through the eyelid. Biomed Eng. 1998;32(4):10.1007/bf02368917.
Mackay RS, Marg E. Fast, automatic electronic tonometers based on exact theory. Acta Ophthalmol. 1959;37:495-507.
 
			
		 
			 
			