Awareness and perception of stray dogs and rabies in Shimla: an evaluative study

Deepak Sharma; Begi Ram

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252853

Authors

Deepak Sharma Department of Public Administration, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
Begi Ram Department of Public Administration, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252853

Keywords:

Community awareness, Community perception, Local government, Stray dogs

Abstract

Background: Rabies, a deadly yet preventable disease, continues to pose a grave public health threat. Most rabies cases in India are caused by bites from unvaccinated stray dogs, making the issue of utmost importance and deeply rooted in how society perceives and engages with stray dogs. At the nucleus of this challenge lies public perception, that significantly influences their behaviour towards them, disease. As mandated by the 73^rd and 74^th Constitutional Amendment Acts of 1992, the responsibility for managing stray dogs lies primarily with local self-governments. Their success in implementing sterilization, vaccination, and awareness programs depends heavily on public perception, cooperation, and trust.

Methods: The study was conducted in MC Shimla of Himachal Pradesh with the population sample of 175 selected from top ten most populous wards of MC Shimla. Primary and secondary data has been used for the purpose of research.

Results: Public opinion on feeding stray dogs is divided, with 27.4% appreciating it and 28.6% expressing annoyance, and 22.3% have a concern for hygienic conditions. About half of the respondents believe regular feeding can result into territorial aggression. Despite of having all these concerns, majority of respondents (86.5%) feel that education is essential for responsible interaction with stray dogs.

Conclusions: This study concluded that public perceptions about stray dogs and rabies significantly influence policies. The findings highlight the importance of integrating community awareness and concerns into policy frameworks to ensure sustainable approaches to stray dog management and rabies control.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Meltzer MI, Miranda ME, et al. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World health Organ. 2005;83:360-8.

Sudarshan MK, Mahendra BJ, Madhusudana SN, Narayana DA, Rahman A, Rao NS, et al. An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey. J Commun Dis. 2006;38(1):32.

Wandeler AI. The rabies situation in Western Europe. Develop Biol. 2008;131:19-25.

Octaria R, Salyer SJ, Blanton J, Pieracci EG, Munyua P, Millien M, et al. From recognition to action: a strategic approach to foster sustainable collaborations for rabies elimination. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. 2018;12(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006756

Taylor E, George K, Johnson E, Whitelegg H, Prada JM, Horton DL. Quantifying the interconnectedness between poverty, health access, and rabies mortality. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. 2023;17(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011204

Wallace RM, Undurraga EA, Blanton JD, Cleaton J, Franka R. Elimination of dog-mediated human rabies deaths by 2030: needs assessment and alternatives for progress based on dog vaccination. Front Veter Sci. 2017;4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00009

Gill GS, Singh BB, Dhand NK, Aulakh RS, Ward MP, Brookes VJ. Stray dogs and public health: population estimation in Punjab, India. Veter Sci. 2022;9(2):75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020075

Martinez E, Cesário CS, Dias JV, Silva IO, Souza VB. Community perception and attitudes about the behavior of stray dogs in a college campus. Acta Veter Brasil. 2018;12(1):10-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2018.12.1.7107

Ram B, Sharma D. Performance evaluation of the management of community dogs in Himachal Pradesh: a case study. Nagarlok. 2024;55(3):104-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32381/NL.2023.55.03.7

WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies: first report. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2004:53-55.

Bourhy H, Dautry-Varsat A, Hotez PJ, Salomon J Rabies, still neglected after 125 years of vaccination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(11):e839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000839

Thahaby N, Akand A, Bhat A, Hamdani S. The major factors associated with increased dog population vis-a-vis spread of rabies within Srinagar district of Kashmir Valley, India. Arch Med. 2012.

Shimla civic body wants to leash stray dog problem. Daijiworld.com. Available at: https://www. daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=683021. Accessed on 3 February 2025.

Chauhan K. Stray dogs have the run of Himachal. The Tribune. Available at: https://www.tribuneindia. com/news/archive/himachal-tribune/stray-dogs-have-the-run-of-himachal-861668/. Accessed on 6 April 2022.

Tiwari HK, Vanak AT, O’Dea M, Gogoi-Tiwari J, Robertson ID. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards dog-bite related rabies in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):e0007120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007120

Sharma V, Kumar R, Singh A. Awareness and practices regarding rabies among residents of Patna, India. Int J Med Public Health. 2023;15(3):695-700.

ATREE. Dog population management and rabies control policy in India. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment. 2018. Available at: https://archived.atree.org/sites/default/files/Dog_Population_Management_Rabies_Control_Policy.pdf. Accessed on 20 May 2025.

WHO-APCRI. Assessing the burden of rabies in India: Results from a national multi-center epidemiological survey. World Health Organization and Association for Prevention and Control of Rabies in India; 2017.