Current pattern of use and barriers to implementation of eSanjeevani telemedicine services in Kerala, India

P. S. Nabil Rosh; S. S. Lal; Serin Lopez; G. K. Mini

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20253255

Authors

P. S. Nabil Rosh Global Institute of Public Health, Ananthapuri Hospital and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
S. S. Lal Global Institute of Public Health, Ananthapuri Hospital and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
Serin Lopez Global Institute of Public Health, Ananthapuri Hospital and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
G. K. Mini Global Institute of Public Health, Ananthapuri Hospital and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20253255

Keywords:

Barriers to implementation, Digital health, eSanjeevani, India, Kerala, , Patient satisfaction

Abstract

Background: Kerala State in India presents a distinctive context for studying the implementation and impact of telemedicine, owing to its high levels of digital literacy and relatively well-structured public health infrastructure. This study analyses the adoption and utilization patterns of eSanjeevani, the national telemedicine service, examining both beneficiary and provider perspectives within the state of Kerala.

Methods: We conducted a survey among 300 eSanjeevani beneficiaries by covering details of socio-demographics, experiences, motivations for use, patterns of use and challenges. The in-depth interview of key informants assessed implementation challenges in both Outpatient Department and Health and Wellness Centre platforms. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed for quantitative analysis, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed.

Results: Majority (75%) of the beneficiaries were satisfied with eSanjeevani services. However, 21.3% were unaware that the service’s continuation. Users appreciated time savings but reported system glitches, slow platform response, connectivity failures and interface difficulties. Younger, employed, college-educated males found the service easier to use. The findings from stakeholder perspectives highlight critical technical, operational and policy challenges affecting the effective implementation of eSanjeevani. Stakeholders recommended integrating eSanjeevani with national health programs, expanding awareness and improved training for healthcare providers, particularly in mental health services.

Conclusions: eSanjeevani has strong potential to expand healthcare access in Kerala, but challenges remain for more awareness on continuity of the services. Efforts to enhance digital skills and address healthcare professionals' concerns are key to ensuring equitable and sustained use of the platform.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kumaravelu S, Ponraj V. Study on the efficacy of telemedicine system implementation at SRMC. International J Telemed Clin Pract. 2018;3(1):45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMCP.2018.093642

Mishra SK, Kapoor L, Singh IP. Telemedicine in India: Current scenario and the future. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2009;15(3):250-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0059

Chellaiyan VG, Nirupama AY, Taneja N. Telemedicine in India: Where do we stand. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(6):1872-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_264_19

Mathur P, Srivastava, S, Lalchandani A. Evolving role of telemedicine in healthcare delivery in India. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;23(4):345-51.

Kumar S, Sharma R. Key barriers in the growth of rural healthcare: An ISM-MICMAC approach. Benchmarking: An Int J. 2018;25(3):879-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2017-0095

Taqi M, Bidhuri S, Sarkar S. Rural healthcare infrastructural disparities in India: A critical analysis of availability and accessibility. J Med Res Health. 2017;4(2):89-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15415/jmrh.2017.32011

Chatterjee, P. The health system in India: The underserved majority. Lancet. 2017;10:2426-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32860-X

Sreenu N. Healthcare infrastructure development in rural India: A critical analysis of its status and future challenges. British J Health Man. 2019;25(1):34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2018.0072

Gupta R, Priya MP, Dash N, Singh A, Das L, Arora A, et al. Evolution of India’s National teleconsultation platform e-Sanjeevani: A comparative analysis of versions 2.0 and 1.0, with a preliminary report from the state of Haryana. Heal Technol. 2025;15(1):153-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-024-00907-x

Bhaskar S, Rastogi A, Chattu VK. Telemedicine across the globe-position paper from the COVID-19 pandemic health system resilience program (REPROGRAM) international consortium (Part 1). Front Publ Health. 2020;8:556720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.556720

Mahajan V, Singh T, Azad C. Using Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57:658–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-1895-6

Omboni S, Padwal RS, Alessa T. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: Current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connected Health. 2022;1(1):7–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2021.03

Ummer O, Scott K, Mohan D. Connecting the dots: Kerala’s use of digital technology during the COVID-19 response. BMJ Global Health. 2021,6:5355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005355

Adithyan GS, Ranjan A, Muraleedharan VR, Sundararaman T. Kerala’s progress towards universal health coverage: the road travelled and beyond. Ints J Equ Heal. 2024;23(1):152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02231-2

Jossy PE, Nandini P, Nair PR. Knowledge, attitude and perceived barriers to telemedicine among medical professionals: A cross-sectional study. Int J Comm Med Publ Heal. 2024;11(5):1833–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20240932

Nanda M, Sharma R. A review of patient satisfaction and experience with telemedicine: A virtual solution during and beyond COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(12):1325–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0570

Hung KKC, Chan EYY, Lo ES. User perceptions of COVID-19 telemedicine testing services, disease risk and pandemic preparedness: Findings from a private clinic in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Medical J. 2023;29(4):89-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj219414

Smrke A, Younger E, Wilson R, Husson O, Farag S, Merry E, Macklin-Doherty A, Cojocaru E, Arthur A, Benson C, Miah AB. Telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on care for rare cancers. JCO Global Oncol. 2020;6:1046-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00220

Xu P, Hudnall M, Zhao S, Raja U, Parton J, Lewis D. Pandemic-triggered adoption of telehealth in underserved communities: Descriptive study of pre-and post-shutdown trends. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(7):38602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/38602

Moulaei K, Shanbehzadeh M, Bahaadinbeigy K, Kazemi-Arpanahi H. Survey of the patients' perspectives and preferences in adopting telepharmacy versus in-person visits to the pharmacy: a feasibility study during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2022;22(1):99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01834-5

Joshi K, Modi B, Katoch CDS. Utilization of telemedicine services of institute of national importance in the western region of India: A mixed-method study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2024;13(9):3782-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_56_24

Gabrielsson-Jarhult F, Kjellstrom S, Josefsson, KA. Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: A mixed methods study of users’ experiences and care patterns. Scandinavian J Prim Health Care. 2021;39(2):112-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1913904

Ramaswamy A, Yu M, Drangsholt S. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: Retrospective cohort study. J Med Int Res. 2020;22(9):20786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/20786

Singh GK, Girmay M, Allender M. Digital divide: Marked disparities in computer and broadband internet use and associated health inequalities in the United States. International J Transl Med Res and Public Health. 2020;4(2):12-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21106/ijtmrph.148

Marston HR, Shore L, White PJ. How does a (Smart) Age-Friendly Ecosystem Look in a Post-Pandemic Society. Int J Envir Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218276

Ellison-Barnes A, Moran AJ, Linton SL. Limited technology access among residents of affordable senior housing during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Aging Soc Pol. 2021;33(5):354-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211013634

Breton M, Deville-Stoetzel N, Gaboury I. Telehealth in primary healthcare: A portrait of its rapid implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthc Pol. 2021;17(1):73–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2021.26576

Stunkel L, Grady C. More than the money: A review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations. Contemporary Clin Trials. 2010;31(5)385-95.

South J, Purcell ME, Branney P. Rewarding altruism: Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives. Social Sci Med. 2013;96:220-6.

D’Souza K, Singh S, Westgard C. A qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators of telemedicine volunteerism during the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Human Resources for Health. 2024;22(21):38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00897-x

Qureshi A, Garcia-Font V, Rifa-Pous H. Collaborative and efficient privacy-preserving critical incident management system. Expert Syst Applicat. 2020;163:113727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113727

Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Bashshur N. The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed and e-Health. 2015;22(2):87-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0206

Manera V, Partos C, Beauchet O. Teleconsultations for mental health: Recommendations from a Delphi panel. Intervention. 2023;34:100660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100660

Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Nurse Pract. 2020;45(12):20-6.

Balestra ML. Telehealth and legal implications for nurse practitioners. J Nurse Pract. 2017;13(9):605-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2016.09.010

Department of Health Services, Government of Kerala: Mission and vision, DHS. Avaialble at: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/mission-and-vision. Accessed on 21 June 2025.