Cost-utility analysis of outpatient department based small biopsies for diagnosis of gynecological cancers: a single centre study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252179Keywords:
Office biopsy, Out-patient care, Cost effectiveness, Health insuranceAbstract
Background: The financial toxicity of treating cancer is exorbitant and health insurance schemes such as the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Arogya Bima Yojna, have a great impact in mitigating this difficulty. However, package reallocation can be considered for certain surgical procedures that can be performed on an out-patient basis without requirement of admission. This study was conducted with aim of assessing cost-utility of small biopsies compared with the tier 3 to tier 1 package provided in the PMJAY scheme. The study has relevance and significance to the Indian population and similar populations in the low-middle income or even high-income countries, where the public health insurance system is implemented.
Methods: This study compares the cost-utility of performing out-patient diagnostic procedures with those performed in the daycare/in-patient setting, with or without utilization of the public health insurance package. The accuracy of the procedure was assessed for biopsies performed on 145 patients evaluated in the out-patient department (OPD) in 2 years. The accuracy of small biopsy in confirmation of diagnosis and its role in decision making was assessed.
Results: The study found high accuracy of outpatient procedures in confirmation of diagnosis of gynecological malignancies while being very cost-effective.
Conclusions: This analysis concludes that OPD based biopsies or office procedures are very cost-effective and can significantly and positively impact out-of-pocket expenditure for patients seeking cancer treatments, while saving the costs in the insurance scheme packages.
Metrics
References
Chalkidou K, Marquez P, Dhillon PK, Teerawattananon Y, Anothaisintawee T, Gadelha CA, et al. Evidence-informed frameworks for cost-effective cancer care and prevention in low, middle, and high-income countries. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):e119-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70547-3
National Health Authority. National Health Benefit Package 2.2. – User Guidelines. 2021. Available at: https://nha.gov.in/img/resources/HBP-2.2-manual.pdf. Accessed on 12 May 2025.
Tanko NM, Linkov F, Bapayeva G, Ukybassova T, Kaiyrlykyzy A, Aimagambetova G, et al. Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Daily Clinical Practice: Why the Approach to Patients Should Be Personalized? J Pers Med. 2021;11(10):970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11100970
Lee S, Rose MS, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Zhao R, Duggan MA. Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017;36(4):310-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000345
Chen H, Strickland AL, Castrillon DH. Histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers: Updates and future directions. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2022;39(3):137-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2021.12.001
McCluggage WG. My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(8):801-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.029702
Thomison JB, Tosh RH. Evaluation of punch biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;84:98-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(62)90681-6
Cost-Effectiveness Threshold. York; York Health Economics Consortium. 2016. Available at: https://yhec.co.uk/glossary/cost-effectiveness-threshold. Accessed on 12 May 2025.
Bonow MP, Collaço LM, Percicote AP, Zanine RM. When is There no Benefit in Performing a Biopsy in the Suspicion of Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix? Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022;44(3):272-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744212
De Silva PM, Smith PP, Cooper NAM, Clark TJ. Outpatient Hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2024;131(13):e86-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17907
Kirkup W, Hill AS. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87(1):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04416.x
Singh MP, Prinja S, Rajsekar K, Gedam P, Aggarwal V, Sachin O, et al. Cost of Surgical Care at Public Sector District Hospitals in India: Implications for Universal Health Coverage and Publicly Financed Health Insurance Schemes. Pharmacoecon Open. 2022;6(5):745-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00342-6
Parmar D, Strupat C, Srivastava S, Brenner S, Parisi D, Ziegler S, et al. Effects of the Indian National Health Insurance Scheme (PM-JAY) on Hospitalizations, Out-of-pocket Expenditures and Catastrophic Expenditures. Health Syst Reform. 2023;9(1):2227430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2023.2227430
Prinja S, Dixit J, Gupta N, Dhankhar A, Kataki AC, Roy PS, et al. Financial toxicity of cancer treatment in India: towards closing the cancer care gap. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1065737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065737
Prinja S, Dixit J, Nimesh R, Garg B, Khurana R, Paliwal A, et al. Impact of health benefit package policy interventions on service utilisation under government-funded health insurance in Punjab, India: analysis of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY). Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024;28:100462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100462
Halder P, Dixit J, Gupta N, Mehra N, Singh A, Malhotra P, et al. Access to timely cancer treatment initiation in India: extent, determinants and trends. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024;32:100514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100514
Davis CR, Toll EC, Bates AS, Cole MD, Smith FC. Surgical and procedural skills training at medical school - a national review. Int J Surg. 2014;12(8):877-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.069
Johnston MJ, Singh P, Pucher PH, Fitzgerald JE, Aggarwal R, Arora S, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of surgical fellowship training on patient outcomes. Br J Surg. 2015;102(10):1156-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9860
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th edition. Oxford University Press; 2015.
Kallalli BN, Rawson K, Kumari V, Patil S, Singh A, Sulaga S. Comparison between clinical examination, ultrasonography, and computed tomography in assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2016;28(4):364-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.200630
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
