Evaluation of imaging by radiography, ultrasonography and computed tomography in suspected cases of intestinal obstruction and its comparison with operative findings

Nyla Mary Babu; Binoj Varghese V.; Alfie J.  Kavalakat; James Mathew; Divya Acma  George; Jubin  Mathew

doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252484

Authors

Nyla Mary Babu Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
Binoj Varghese V. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
Alfie J. Kavalakat Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
James Mathew Department of Surgery, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
Divya Acma George Department of Radiology, Microlab scan centre, Mavelikara, Kerala, India
Jubin Mathew Department of General medicine, KMCT Medical college, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20252484

Keywords:

Ultrasonography, Computed tomography, Abdominal radiograph, Intestinal obstruction

Abstract

Background: Intestinal obstruction is a common surgical emergency, accounting for up to 20% of acute abdominal surgeries. Rapid diagnosis is essential to prevent complications like ischemia, gangrene, and perforation. Imaging modalities play a critical role in identifying the site, cause, and severity of obstruction. The objectives of the study were to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal radiography, ultrasonography (USG), and computed tomography (CT) in detecting intestinal obstruction and its cause with intraoperative findings.

Methods: This prospective diagnostic evaluation study was conducted over 10 months in the department of radiodiagnosis at a private medical college in Thrissur. A total of 40 adult patients clinically suspected of intestinal obstruction who underwent radiograph, USG, CT, and subsequent surgery were included. Imaging findings were compared with intraoperative diagnoses. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results: Among 40 participants, 82.5% were over 40 years and 57.5% were males. CT showed the highest sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%) in detecting the cause of obstruction, while USG had good sensitivity (72.7%) and specificity (88.9%). Radiography showed low sensitivity (0%) but high specificity (100%). CT identified transition points in 95% of cases and the underlying cause in 70%, outperforming USG and radiography. Intraoperatively, adhesions (45%) and lesions (55%) were the common etiologies.

Conclusions: CT is the most accurate modality for diagnosing intestinal obstruction. While radiography remains useful for initial assessment, combining it with USG and CT improves diagnostic accuracy and guides timely surgical intervention.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimaraes LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):423-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085514

Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Browne AM, Alhajeri AN, Roche C, Murphy JM. MR enterography in the evaluation of small bowel dilation. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(10):1026-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.007

Vercruysse G, Busch R, Dimcheff D, Al-Hawary M, Saad R, Seagull FJ, et al. Evaluation and management of mechanical small bowel obstruction in adults. Michigan Medicine University of Michigan. 2021.

Souvik A, Hossein MZ, Amitabha D, Nilanjan M, Udipta R. Etiology and outcome of acute intestinal obstruction: a review of 367 patients in eastern India. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(4):285-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.70617

Pujahari AK. Decision making in bowel obstruction: A Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11): PE07-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/22170.8923

Maglinte DD, Howard TJ, Lillemoe KD, Sandrasegaran K, Rex DK. Small-bowel obstruction: state-of-the-art imaging and its role in clinical management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(2):130-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.025

Maglinte DD, Heitkamp DE, Howard TJ, Kelvin FM, Lappas JC. Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin. 2003;41(2):263-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00114-8

Jang TB, Schindler D, Kaji AH. Bedside ultrasonography for the detection of small bowel obstruction in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(8):676-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.095729

Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, Venkataramu NK, Sood B, Wig JD. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol. 1999;40(4):422-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02841859909177758

Mohi JK, Kajal S, Singh T, Singh J, Kaur N. Role of imaging in evaluation of intestinal obstruction. Int J Med Res Rev. 2017;5(6):593-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i06.08

Thompson WM, Kilani RK, Smith BB, Thomas J, Jaffe TA, Delong DM, et al. Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(3):W233-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0817

Catena F, De Simone B, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L. Bowel obstruction: a narrative review for all physicians. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0240-7

Long B, Gottlieb M. Accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Am Fam Phys. 2021;104(2):135-6.

Colon MJ, Telem DA, Wong D, Divino CM. The relevance of transition zones on computed tomography in the management of small bowel obstruction. Surgery. 2010;147(3):373-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.005

Bower KL, Lollar DI, Williams SL, Adkins FC, Luyimbazi DT, Bower CE. Small bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(5):945-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.05.007