Incidence of vascular and biliary anomalies found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and their outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20253239Keywords:
Biliary tract abnormalities, Hepatobiliary anatomy, Minimally invasive surgery, Vascular variations, Surgical complicationsAbstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the preferred surgical approach for gallbladder pathology, yet remains technically challenging due to frequent anatomical variations of the hepatobiliary system. Undetected preoperatively in many cases, these anomalies substantially influence procedural difficulty and patient outcomes. This investigation systematically evaluated their incidence and clinical consequences.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care center from April 2023 to April 2024, enrolling 50 consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria. Intraoperative documentation of vascular and biliary variations was performed, with subsequent analysis of operative duration, complication rates, and conversion frequencies. Statistical comparisons employed appropriate tests with significance set at p<0.05.
Results: Among study participants, 26% demonstrated anatomical variations- predominantly biliary (20%) rather than vascular (6%). Specific anomalies included short cystic duct (6%), accessory bile ducts (10%), and double cystic artery (2%). Procedures involving anatomical variations required significantly extended operative times (p=0.047), with 23% exceeding two hours compared to 5% in standard anatomy cases. The overall complication rate remained low (8%), including bile leaks (4%) and hemorrhage (2%), without statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.72). Conversion to open procedure occurred in 6% of cases, principally due to challenging dissection (4%) or significant bleeding (2%).
Conclusions: While anatomical variations prolong operative duration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, meticulous surgical technique maintains acceptable complication rates. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative imaging evaluation and intraoperative vigilance. Future technological advances in three-dimensional reconstruction and robotic assistance may further enhance procedural safety in complex anatomical scenarios.
Metrics
References
Singh K, Ohri A. Clinical reappraisal of vasculobiliary anatomy relevant to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(2):722-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_268_16
Talpur KA, Laghari AA, Yousfani SA, Malik AM, Memon AI, Khan SA. Anatomical variations and congenital anomalies of extrahepatic biliary system encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(2):105-9.
Marano L, Bartoli A, Polom K, Bellochi R, Spaziani A, Castagnoli G. The unwanted third wheel in the Calot's triangle: Incidence and surgical significance of caterpillar hump of right hepatic artery with a systematic review of the literature. J Minim Access Surg. 2019;15(3):185-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_75_18
Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg. 1996;83(10):1356-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800831009
Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB. 2006;8(4):311-8.
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101-25.
Sen S, Goel S, Gaur M. Anatomical variation of extra-hepatic biliary tree and vasculature encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Contemp Surg. 2020;8(2):20-5.
Jarrar MS, Masmoudi W, Barka M, Chermiti W, Zaghouani H, Youssef S, et al. Anatomic variations of the extrahepatic biliary tree. A monocentric study and review of the literature. La Tunis Med. 2021;99(6):652.
Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(6):571-8.
Majeed AW, Troy G, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ, Peacock J, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1996;347(9007):989-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90143-9
Sureka B, Bansal K, Patidar Y, Arora A. Magnetic resonance cholangiographic evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct variations. Indian J Radiol Imag. 2016;26(01):22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.178283
Andall RG, Matusz P, du Plessis M, Ward R, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: a review of over 9800 cases. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016;38(5):529-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1600-y
Hasan MM, Reza E, Khan MR, Laila SZ, Rahman F, Mamun MH. Anatomical and congenital anomalies of extra hepatic biliary system encountered during cholecystectomy. Mymensingh Med J. 2013;22(1):20-6.
Broderick RC, Omid J, Brown A, Horgan S. Fluorescent cholangiography significantly improves patient outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(3):1106-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08045-x
de’Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, Coccolini F, Martínez-Pérez A, Romeo OM, et al. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w
Aguiar JA, Liao JC, Thornburg B. Biliary anatomy. 2021. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021;38(3):251-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731085
Lee SM, Lim JH. Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2021;25(1):78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.78
Kalata S, Thumma JR, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Sheetz KH. Comparative safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(12):1303-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
