Enhancing diabetes and hypertension management in rural India through a peer support program: evaluating a community-based intervention using RE-AIM framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20251018Keywords:
Community health services, Community participation, Lifestyle risk reduction, Peer group, Primary health care, Self-careAbstract
Background: The health care system in India lacks an approach targeting individual risk behavior change and self-care practices. Thus, it is imperative to complement the healthcare system's efforts with alternative care management strategies at the grassroots. This paper aims to evaluate the utility of a community-based peer support program facilitated by trained volunteers to better manage diabetes and hypertension in rural areas of Karnataka state, India.
Methods: A semi-structured peer support group approach called Swasthya Samithi (SS) and capacity-building activities empower patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, caregivers, and community health workers for better chronic care management through the ACE-ME program. Glasgow's RE-AIM framework assessed reach, feasibility, and effectiveness. A structured questionnaire based on WHO's STEPS tool, standardized scales, and qualitative checklists (Mixed-method approach) were used to collect data on program processes, output/outcome variables like lifestyle behavior, self-care practices, and clinical values.
Results: The program reached 98% of the intended participants along with the non-patient community members. A total of 56 SS meetings were facilitated. Improved lifestyle behavior with reduction in use of tobacco, alcohol, consumption of processed food and significant improvement in self-care practices affirmed that the program was effective. Metabolic control of disease improved from 27% to 42% and 54% to 76% amongst the participants with diabetes and hypertension, respectively.
Conclusion: The active engagement of participants and the capacity building of local health workers were key to the program's significant success, and the implementation experiences of the ACE-ME model provide pragmatic insights for its expansion in similar contexts.
Metrics
References
Bromfield S, Muntner P. High Blood Pressure: The Leading Global Burden of Disease Risk Factor and the Need for Worldwide Prevention Programs. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013;15(3):134–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-013-0340-9
Chauhan S, Kumar S, Patel R, Simon DJ, Kumari A. Burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases-related inequalities among older adults in India: a study based on LASI survey. BMC Geriatrics. 2022;22(1):790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03481-x
Yadav P, Kulkarni VS, Gaiha R. Growing Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in India. University of Pennsylvania Population Center. 2018. Available from: https://repository.upenn.edu. Accessed on 28 November 2024.
Juma K, Juma PA, Shumba C, Otieno P, Asiki G, Juma K, et al. non-communicable diseases and urbanization in african cities: a narrative review (internet). public health in developing countries - challenges and opportunities. Intech Open. 2019;10:289-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89507
Krishnan A, Mathur P, Kulothungan V, Salve HR, Leburu S, Amarchand R, et al. Preparedness of primary and secondary health facilities in india to address major noncommunicable diseases: results of a national noncommunicable disease monitoring survey (NNMS). BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06530-0
Chandra A, Kaur R, Bairwa M, Rai S, Nongkynrih B, Chandra A, et al. Monitoring of non-communicable diseases in a primary healthcare setting in india: a quality improvement initiative. Cureus. 2023;15(4):45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38132
Iglay K, Cartier SE, Rosen VM, Zarotsky V, Rajpathak SN, Radican L, et al. Meta-analysis of studies examining medication adherence, persistence, and discontinuation of oral antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(7):1283–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2015.1053048
Jermendy G, Wittmann I, Nagy L, Kiss Z, Rokszin G, Abonyi-Tóth Z, et al. Persistence of initial oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(2):72–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.882459
Lee DSU, Lee H. Adherence and persistence rates of major antidiabetic medications: a review. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00785-1
Hemming K, Kasza J, Hooper R, Forbes A, Taljaard M. A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(3):979–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz237
Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:759–63.
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7:65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Ritter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1265–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009
Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. The J of Clinical Hypertension. 2008;10(5):348–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Satistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2013.
Thompson DM, Booth L, Moore D, Mathers J. Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07816-7
Kim C, MacMillan F, Osuagwu UL, Simmons D. Peer support facilitator and peer perspectives of an inner-regional Australian diabetes prevention and self-management peer support program. Health & Social Care in the Comm. 2022;30(6):4051–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13798
Riddell MA, Dunbar JA, Absetz P, Wolfe R, Li H, Brand M, et al. Cardiovascular risk outcome and program evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a community-based, lay peer led program for people with diabetes. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3538-3
19. Haldane V, Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Singh SR, Koh GCH, Seng CK, et al. Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):216112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216112
20. Shea S, Basch CE. A review of five major community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programs. Part II: Intervention strategies, evaluation methods, and results. Am J Health Promot. 1990;4(4):279–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-4.4.279
Centre for Disease Control & prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevent High Blood Pressure. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure. Accessed on 21 August 2024.
Suseela R, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women’s self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):10296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010296
Philis-Tsimikas A, Fortmann A, Lleva-Ocana L, Walker C, Gallo LC. Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk Mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1926–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2081
Solomon P. Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation J. 2004;27(4):392–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/27.2004.392.401
Chinman M, George P, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Swift A, et al. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(4):429–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300244
Walker G, Bryant W. Peer support in adult mental health services: a metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013;36(1):28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094744
Patil SJ, Ruppar T, Koopman RJ, Lindbloom EJ, Elliott SG, Mehr DR, et al. Effect of peer support interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5326-8
Tang TS, Funnell M, Sinco B, Piatt G, Palmisano G, Spencer MS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1525–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2161
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
